Political Crossfire Forums

Tracker · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: The Politics Of Laughing

The Politics Of Laughing

You've probably seen it on the news, or heard about it on the radio by now. Comedian, Michael Richards, is being likened to "Mark Ferman" -- having 'outted himself' as a 'racist' during a 'racist ranting meltdown.'

Michael Richards is an entertainer. He was performing ON STAGE at the comic club, called, "The Laugh Factory."

SATIRE is a comics 'best friend.'

The entertainer doesn't care who fills the chairs in the audience -- size/shape/color of audience members is always a non-issue. Equality first.

At one time, Church HATED so-called 'beloved-neighbors' of different skin color, and their so-called 'positive-godly-members' PROMOTED segregation. When they were confronted about their HATE, they'd loft themselves on self-made 'victim-stages' to boo-hoo for profit, sympathy and attention, claiming, "My god and his book is the one and only truth and you have offended me -- there ought to be a law to censor such hateful criticism of my religious freedom. We're so oppressed!"

So, they SEGREGATED criticism, in their so-called 'positive-goodness.'

Michael Richards, during a performance, was victimized by a group of harrassing audience members, under the influence of something (hate, but probably not from a bottle), and disruptive.

How rude is that? What part of 'community participation' does that 'subscribe' to?

Using SATIRE, the 'best friend' of ALL comics, Michael Richards REMINDED everyone how HORRID segregated society truly is. He REMINDED us all of how the so-called 'positive-people' hatefully label others as 'negative' in order to ruthylessly hammer others to their self-made, so-called and quite merciless 'positive-cross-signs' in non-stop FigurativeCarpentry -- ANY EXCUSE WILL DO -- nailed with the points of their own hypocritical forked-tongues, crucified on the merciless CrossOfShame/Hate, in so-called 'positive-goodness.'

REMEMBER HOW IT WAS? SEE HOW IT STILL IS?

And that same hateful ideology has infiltrated and infected those whom were victimized by segregation, NOW, to loft themselves on self-made victim-stages and do the same thing, in subtle ways, while claiming 'superiority' and 'moral authority.'

And instead of uniting audiences and communities through the inherent right of FreedomOfSpeech/Expression, hilighting the fact that segregatorial lynchings are horrid and DIVIDE WeThePeople with subtle hatreds for differences, ThePeople are now being PLAYED by MEDIA to ignore the message and KILL THE MESSENGER, as usual.

Michael Richards REMINDED us of how hateful segregation and cencorship truly is. Are you hating him by SPINNING the message to further the goals of the so-called 'positive-people' promoting their usual hateful segregationist agenda?

The MEDIA is.

Why? :roll:

And The Laugh Factory BANNED the entertainer, in so-called 'positive-goodness,' CASTING HIM OUT to DENY EQUALITY, life, liberty and pursuits of happiness.

Go figure. :roll:

So, the disruptive group at the public entertainment venue are the 'victims'?

Think again.

By twisting/spinning it the 'other way,' YOU are doing the victimizing, promoting hateful 'racist' DIVIDES in so-called 'positive-goodness' by CLAIMING you are against EXACTLY THAT.

Rev. Haggards' FRAUD, re-visited, on a grand-scale. It's just sooooooooooooo gross.

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject:

Well, Then might I be the first to nominate Richards for the Presidency next time...

VOTE RICHARDS'08
VOTE RICHARDS'08
VOTE RICHARDS'08

Lumina · Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 18066

Tracker wrote: The Politics Of Laughing

You've probably seen it on the news, or heard about it on the radio by now. Comedian, Michael Richards, is being likened to "Mark Ferman" -- having 'outted himself' as a 'racist' during a 'racist ranting meltdown.'

Michael Richards is an entertainer. He was performing ON STAGE at the comic club, called, "The Laugh Factory."

SATIRE is a comics 'best friend.'

The entertainer doesn't care who fills the chairs in the audience -- size/shape/color of audience members is always a non-issue. Equality first.

At one time, Church HATED so-called 'beloved-neighbors' of different skin color, and their so-called 'positive-godly-members' PROMOTED segregation. When they were confronted about their HATE, they'd loft themselves on self-made 'victim-stages' to boo-hoo for profit, sympathy and attention, claiming, "My god and his book is the one and only truth and you have offended me -- there ought to be a law to censor such hateful criticism of my religious freedom. We're so oppressed!"

So, they SEGREGATED criticism, in their so-called 'positive-goodness.'

Michael Richards, during a performance, was victimized by a group of harrassing audience members, under the influence of something (hate, but probably not from a bottle), and disruptive.

How rude is that? What part of 'community participation' does that 'subscribe' to?

Using SATIRE, the 'best friend' of ALL comics, Michael Richards REMINDED everyone how HORRID segregated society truly is. He REMINDED us all of how the so-called 'positive-people' hatefully label others as 'negative' in order to ruthylessly hammer others to their self-made, so-called and quite merciless 'positive-cross-signs' in non-stop FigurativeCarpentry -- ANY EXCUSE WILL DO -- nailed with the points of their own hypocritical forked-tongues, crucified on the merciless CrossOfShame/Hate, in so-called 'positive-goodness.'

REMEMBER HOW IT WAS? SEE HOW IT STILL IS?

And that same hateful ideology has infiltrated and infected those whom were victimized by segregation, NOW, to loft themselves on self-made victim-stages and do the same thing, in subtle ways, while claiming 'superiority' and 'moral authority.'

And instead of uniting audiences and communities through the inherent right of FreedomOfSpeech/Expression, hilighting the fact that segregatorial lynchings are horrid and DIVIDE WeThePeople with subtle hatreds for differences, ThePeople are now being PLAYED by MEDIA to ignore the message and KILL THE MESSENGER, as usual.

Michael Richards REMINDED us of how hateful segregation and cencorship truly is. Are you hating him by SPINNING the message to further the goals of the so-called 'positive-people' promoting their usual hateful segregationist agenda?

The MEDIA is.

Why? :roll:

And The Laugh Factory BANNED the entertainer, in so-called 'positive-goodness,' CASTING HIM OUT to DENY EQUALITY, life, liberty and pursuits of happiness.

Go figure. :roll:

So, the disruptive group at the public entertainment venue are the 'victims'?

Think again.

By twisting/spinning it the 'other way,' YOU are doing the victimizing, promoting hateful 'racist' DIVIDES in so-called 'positive-goodness' by CLAIMING you are against EXACTLY THAT.

Rev. Haggards' FRAUD, re-visited, on a grand-scale. It's just sooooooooooooo gross.

Ummm, have you actually seen the TMZ clip?

Two guys hecked him, and Richards lost it. Unfortunately, he's not talented enough to have quipped them down, so he called them mofos and n-words and said that 50 years ago, they would've gotten a fork up their butts.

That's not satire, my friend; that's dull, unimaginative invective.

Tracker · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:07 pm Post subject:

Chyn: :lol: :lol: :lol:

================

Lumina: lights-out or something? :roll:

It was HIS PERFORMANCE and so-called 'positive-people' DEMANDED ATTENTION during HIS PERFORMANCE.

How 'right' is THAT?

And when he asked them to stop, they became insulting and rude and even more disruptive, in so-called 'positive-goodness,' dragging-down the entire audience into a mud-slinging frenzy of their own hateful concoction, and reducing that business's revenues in so-called 'positive-goodness' --

-- THEN, when satirized by the performer in 'audience participation' as all good performers do -- these same disruptive individuals pulled the 'race-card' and claimed, "Oh! We're VICTIMS! Boo-hoo!" to PROFIT from atop the rubble, misery and grief of their own concoction, in so-called 'positive-goodness.'

It was a FRAUD. A SETUP.

And the performer did NOT do what you have it in your mind that he did. Just like 'police-beating-videos' -- when presented as 'police brutality,' FIRST, when you see the tape, your mind is ALREADY MADE UP -- but you have no idea what happened before or after or why it occured at all.

In the middle of performer's PRESENTATION that was to REMIND us ALL of EQUALITY and the hard, fought DEFENSIVE ACTION that our government took when ThePeople were waged war against by hateful religionists in their so-called 'positive-goodness,' those whom perpetrated the FRAUD, that SETUP, intentionally and deliberately took every event, word and breath out-of-context to further their own hateful agenda to DIVIDE in so-called 'positive-goodness,' merely to claim, "See! YOU are WORSE than US!"

Had the performer been allowed five more seconds, that FRAUD would not have succeeded.

Now, YOU are perpetrating that FRAUD : ignoring the message and CRUCIFYING the messenger in your own so-called 'positive-goodness.'

Tracker · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:13 pm Post subject:

Proof?

Sure. You can't even TALK about a word that was born of hate: "****," because it has been CENSORED by the so-called 'positive-people,' in their so-called 'positive-goodness,' to loft themselves on self-made victim-stages to claim, "OH! YOU are WORSE than US! We're so oppressed!" -- every time you criticize or discuss or have a contrary-opinion to their own so-called and obviously hateful 'positive-godly-goodness.'

look: ****

See there? You can't even discuss it without it being PRE-CENSORED.

Just like Michael Richards -- NOW.

It's not a 'paradox.' It's an illogical hateful religious HOAX, as ALL CENSORSHIP is.

DSwain · Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 3552

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061120/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

Puts it into perspective

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:39 pm Post subject:

Wow..now that's a loss of a person sorely needed in Iraq.

in fact when Richards comes to trial as he probably will in the US, maybe he can do a little tour in Iraq?

Rankor and Pissing · Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 10200

Tracker wrote: Proof?

Sure. You can't even TALK about a word that was born of hate: "****," because it has been CENSORED by the so-called 'positive-people,' in their so-called 'positive-goodness,' to loft themselves on self-made victim-stages to claim, "OH! YOU are WORSE than US! We're so oppressed!" -- every time you criticize or discuss or have a contrary-opinion to their own so-called and obviously hateful 'positive-godly-goodness.'

look: ****

See there? You can't even discuss it without it being PRE-CENSORED.

Just like Michael Richards -- NOW.

It's not a 'paradox.' It's an illogical hateful religious HOAX, as ALL CENSORSHIP is.

Why am I not surprised you're defending a bigot? Bigots can be any color, any creed, anyone at all. It's socially unacceptable. It wasn't satire, it was anger venting itself as bigotry. Discrimination used in anger shows what the person actually is... anyone? anyone? A BIGOT.

Go shout whatever words you want, whenever you want to. Be my guest. Just don't try to float this bulls**t past readers like it was some planned social activism theater meant to make people think... cut me a break.

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject:

How is he a Bigot Rankor? Pls Explain...

Rankor and Pissing · Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 10200

Chymical wrote: How is he a Bigot Rankor? Pls Explain...

Watch the video, look up the word bigot... add 1+1. Tada!!

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:05 pm Post subject:

That's no explanation. How is Richards: 'a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own'

Show the prejudice, show the intolerance, I don't think calling someone a n i g g e r absolutely seals this deal...it may allow those with a condemnatory agenda to imply a lot, but he said nothing bigotted.

Lumina · Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 18066

Chymical wrote: That's no explanation. How is Richards: 'a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own'

Show the prejudice, show the intolerance, I don't think calling someone a n i g g e r absolutely seals this deal...it may allow those with a condemnatory agenda to imply a lot, but he said nothing bigotted.

Have you watched the video clip?

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:05 pm Post subject:

well, yeah...he lost it...absolutely

doesn't make him a bigot though, I'd need to see a sincere pattern of behaviour before I would condemn anyone for such a thing.

Lumina · Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 18066

Chymical wrote: well, yeah...he lost it...absolutely

doesn't make him a bigot though, I'd need to see a sincere pattern of behaviour before I would condemn anyone for such a thing.

I agree with you about that, but I was responding to your "show the intolerance." Richards showed the intolerance. Boy went off.

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject:

what did he say that was intolerant though? he threw around the N-word, he didn't say Blacks should be lynched for being black or anything, or that they were less as people.

Is it intolerant to heckle a performer? intolerance all-round, I'd hate to see Richards castigated and burned by the PC brigade over this---storm in an eggcup honestly.

Lumina · Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 18066

Chymical wrote: what did he say that was intolerant though? he threw around the N-word, he didn't say Blacks should be lynched for being black or anything, or that they were less as people.

Yes, actually, he did. "Richards retorted: "Shut up! Fifty years ago we'd have you upside down with a f——— fork up your a—."

What do you suppose the "fifty years" was referencing?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,230727,00.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,230727,00.html

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:24 pm Post subject:

referencing how much has changed perhaps? He never said he agreed with such things.

Lumina · Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 18066

Chymical wrote: referencing how much has changed perhaps? He never said he agreed with such things.

Well, Seinfeld arranged for Richards to go on Letterman tonight, so we can simply all see for ourselves what he has to say.

He didn't have to say he agreed with such things; what he actually said made that implicit. The two black hecklers caused him to lose his cool, and he said what he did in anger. Watch the clip.

blockhead · Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 597 Location: SouthWest

I can't believe someone is defending him. I guess it's like women who fall in love with convicted murderers who are serving life sentences.

Chymical · Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject:

Lumina wrote: Chymical wrote: referencing how much has changed perhaps? He never said he agreed with such things.

Well, Seinfeld arranged for Richards to go on Letterman tonight, so we can simply all see for ourselves what he has to say.

He didn't have to say he agreed with such things; what he actually said made that implicit. The two black hecklers caused him to lose his cool, and he said what he did in anger. Watch the clip.

well, look forward to better perspective in the morning then. I don't think he made anything explicit or implicit. That was the main problem with what and how he said it...borderline enough to cause a furore, not clear enough to show what he really thinks. If he really did go on a racist rampage telling them they should be strung up or back picking cotton then this wouldn't be warrenting the attention it's getting, we would KNOW he's a douche.

I'm not sure yet, the jury is out for me, unlike some I don't rush to condemnation (not a dig at you be assured)

G'night...