Political Crossfire Forums

callous · Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:31 pm Post subject:

Revenant wrote: My other thread got locked.....damn. Everyone read it while you still can :lol:

I'm surprised it took you as long as it did.

Revenant · Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 16633 Location: Bliss

callous wrote: Revenant wrote: My other thread got locked.....damn. Everyone read it while you still can :lol:

I'm surprised it took you as long as it did.

Yeah I'm getting slow...

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

Gremlin wrote: Mr. Sunshine wrote: Gremlin wrote: Mr. Sunshine wrote: Are you saying that the findings of the 9-11 Comission are false? 8:)

I would add criminally liable as well.

Proof? :roll:

Unfortunately i dont hold peoples hand unless your my girlfriend.
Apparently you need to do a little more research on the subject as the report is a total fraud.

No need to hold my hand. You will need both of yours to refold your shiny hat and check your pockets for a med count. 8:)

blockhead · Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 597 Location: SouthWest

Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

It is a political issue directly reflective of findings of the 9-11 Commission Report sanctioned by our government. 8:)

callous · Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject:

Mr. Sunshine wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

It is a political issue directly reflective of findings of the 9-11 Commission Report sanctioned by our government. 8:)

No, actually he is right, this should be in alternate theories, since the president himself contradicts you.

It doesn't matter how many emoticons with sunglasses you use, sometimes you just can't make something true that isn't.

agentkgb · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 2241 Location: US

callous wrote: Mr. Sunshine wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

It is a political issue directly reflective of findings of the 9-11 Commission Report sanctioned by our government. 8:)

No, actually he is right, this should be in alternate theories, since the president himself contradicts you.

It doesn't matter how many emoticons with sunglasses you use, sometimes you just can't make something true that isn't.
8:) 8:) Saddam did it. 8:) 8:)

Seriously, asking if Iran was more responsible for it than Iraq doesn't make sense. It belongs in Alt-Theories.

DMS · Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 829 Location: Up state NY

Kumar wrote: psholtz wrote: * First "Afghanistan" caused 9/11...
* Then "Iraq" caused 9/11..
* Now "Iran" caused 9/11..
Indeed. Next it will be Syria.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Here is the armchair warriors strategy from 2000. It should be called creating a pax American Empire instead of Rebuilding Americas Defenses. 9-11 was an answer to these scumwads prayers(how conveinant). Quite a disturbing work if you can read through it. A war profiteers wet dream.

Somebloke · Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 2475 Location: London

blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

You hit the nail on the head there.

From the sounds of it, everyone but Australia was involved in 9/11.

DMS · Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 829 Location: Up state NY

Somebloke wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

You hit the nail on the head there.

From the sounds of it, everyone but Australia was involved in 9/11.

They were that is why Steve Irwin was offed(the sting ray was CIA) :lol:

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

agentkgb wrote: callous wrote: Mr. Sunshine wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

It is a political issue directly reflective of findings of the 9-11 Commission Report sanctioned by our government. 8:)

No, actually he is right, this should be in alternate theories, since the president himself contradicts you.

It doesn't matter how many emoticons with sunglasses you use, sometimes you just can't make something true that isn't.
8:) 8:) Saddam did it. 8:) 8:)

Seriously, asking if Iran was more responsible for it than Iraq doesn't make sense. It belongs in Alt-Theories.

The official stance of the U.S. government implicates Iran more than Iraq. Iraq was the third main reason for recent political outcomes in the last U.S. elections. What are you guys afraid of? The truth will set you free. 8:)

agentkgb · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 2241 Location: US

Mr. Sunshine wrote: Iraq was the third main reason for recent political outcomes in the last U.S. elections.
That would be the war in Iraq, not Iraq's involvement in 9/11.

psholtz · Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 23468 Location: California

blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?
Yes..

Revenant · Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 16633 Location: Bliss

psholtz wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?
Yes..

Agreed. This is nowhere close to reality.

Timmytour · Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 6863

DMS wrote: Somebloke wrote: blockhead wrote: Shouldn't this be in Alternative Theories?

You hit the nail on the head there.

From the sounds of it, everyone but Australia was involved in 9/11.

They were that is why Steve Irwin was offed(the sting ray was CIA) :lol:

:lol:

I've no doubt that if a post was set up referring to the amount of contact that Bush had with Bin Ladens family and wondered if it meant Bush was involved, it would have been packed off to the Alternate theories forum like a shot.

I'm sure someone must know what the difference is :shock:

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

Seriously, Pelosi et all have stated that they would correct the direction of the War on Terror based on the 9-11 Commission findings. It had a lot of voter appeal. The report is published and accessible to any American who wishes to read up on the blue print of the Democrats to redeploy out of Iraq and fight the War on Terror properly against the perpetrators of the WTC attack. 8:)

blockhead · Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 597 Location: SouthWest

CIA disputes Bush's Iran-9/11 connection

Edwin Chen and Greg Miller
Los Angeles Times
July 20, 2004

Quote: The independent commission is widely expected to report that some of the Sept. 11 hijackers had traveled freely between Iran and Afghanistan during 2000 and 2001.

They also travelled freely between Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Quote: McLaughlin had said Sunday that although "about eight" of the Sept. 11 hijackers may have passed through Iran before their mission, the CIA had "no evidence that there is some sort of official connection between Iran and 9/11."

Head of the CIA at the time.

http://www.notinourname.net/war/iran-20jul04.htm

Timmytour · Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 6863

I'm sure the Czechs has something to do with it.

Mohammed Atta visited Prague at least once.

There's no way the hijackers would have been able to carry the whole thing off without the Czechs...

Especially the ones that came from Bin Laden :wink:

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

blockhead wrote:
CIA disputes Bush's Iran-9/11 connection

Edwin Chen and Greg Miller
Los Angeles Times
July 20, 2004

Quote: The independent commission is widely expected to report that some of the Sept. 11 hijackers had traveled freely between Iran and Afghanistan during 2000 and 2001.

They also travelled freely between Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Quote: McLaughlin had said Sunday that although "about eight" of the Sept. 11 hijackers may have passed through Iran before their mission, the CIA had "no evidence that there is some sort of official connection between Iran and 9/11."

Head of the CIA at the time.

http://www.notinourname.net/war/iran-20jul04.htm

Bush was not on the 9-11 Commission. The 9-11 Commission was an independent bi-partisan selected body of Congress. Are we know blaming Bush for Pelosi's choice to use the Commission Report as a blueprint for redefining direction of the War on Terror? Isn't she redefining that direction against Bush's "course". :rofl:

Mr. Sunshine · Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1324

Quote: The Iran-al Qaeda contacts were discovered and presented to the Commissioners near the end of the bipartisan panel's more than year-long investigation into the sources and origins of the 9/11 attacks. Much of the new information about Iran came from al-Qaeda detainees interrogated by the U.S. government, including captured Yemeni al-Qaeda operative Waleed Mohammed bin Attash, who organized the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, and from as many as 100 separate electronic intelligence intercepts culled by analysts at the NSA. The findings were sent to the White House for review only this week. But Commission members have been hinting for weeks that their report would have some Iran surprises. As the 9/11 Commission's chairman, Thomas Kean, said in June, "We believe....that there were a lot more active contacts, frankly, with Iran and with Pakistan than there were with Iraq."

www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,664967,00.html

Anyone want to enter a proxy vote for the Chairman of the 9/11 Commission? 8:)