Political Crossfire Forums

[Charlie Man]

Leftist media knows train wrecks when they see them, huh? I'll assume you're including all media that don't agree with the neoconservative agenda into that group.

Does JLB know op ed pieces when he sees them? I've seen quite a number of editorials posted by various and sundry members who go on to try and genealize the opinions espoused by one columnist and fail. Like this. I guess the talking points are just telling you to manufacture a rift that deosn't exist in the democratic party.

Ah well, at least nobody's being fooled.

[Mr. Sunshine]

Thesleezy tentacles of Abramoff were bipartisan in their reach. The mainstream media has not portrayed it that way. To try and say only Republicans are corrupt in a hell hole like Washington is disingenuous and befitting only of a party first fan-boy. Justice should be served equally and swiftly. 8:)

[cool_chick]

sLiPpY wrote: JLB wrote: Sands wrote: Now Swampfox.f...

You see, what you do is...

Post a copy and paste of a columnist's blog from a rightwing Opinion site, with HUGE TEXT and obnoxious colors...add no original opinion of your own, no debate questions, then follow it up with a hundred back to back troll comments until someone with some intelligence shuts your case down.

That's how you get a 20,000+ post count.


Your troll post is certainly an example of how you plan to get there.

I did it the hard way. 8:)

I like the new "diggs" err...avatar/sig.

They're "classic" JLB...but I just lament that if refer to the urple "wind bag."

None of the new folks will know exactly what I'm talking about.

But then again it's "classic JLB" maybe just like inaliable rights it's self-evident? :lol:

Long wrive teh' "purple wind-bag" :flwr:

:lol:

[Swampfox.f]

Eternal wrote: You've perked my interest. What exactly is under the names you've covered up?


Cheers, Eternal


Naked pictures of Pelosi! :lol:


GOP porn like Cheney and Bush enjoying themselves in various positions. :lol:

[Sands]

JLB wrote:

The text in this picture is meaningless partisan sh!t, like most of JLB's cheap graphics.

I think Murtha's checking out Nancy's butt.

[00timh]

Sands wrote: JLB wrote:

The text in this picture is meaningless partisan sh!t, like most of JLB's cheap graphics.

I think Murtha's checking out Nancy's butt. redeployed :lol:

[DMS]

The best ideas come from disagreement. Disagreement comes when you are trying to find a solution to a problem. Not much disagreement comes when everybody follows the leader unquestionably as the Republican controlled congress did. Remember who made this mess, remember the Iraq invasion was planned long before 9-11. Remember every reason that was given for invading Iraq turned out to be a f***ing lie.

The Republicans are already talking about filibustering. They do not want a solution to the problem, they want mindless obedience to the neo-con agenda. If they try this hopefully the Democrats will find the balls to impeach Bush and his band of traitors.

[Mr. Sunshine]

Impeachment is off the table, as confirmed from the many new "leaders" in the splitting factions of the Democratic Congressional majority. I think the GOP would welcome the proceedings to expose the liberal do nothing liberal agenda with a hijacked conservative base from the electorate. Sometimes wanting the victory beyond one's capabilities bites you in the @ss. In the picture above, I think Murtha is looking at the gaping wound in pelosi's rear end and thinking, "better you than me." :rofl:

[DMS]

Mr. Sunshine wrote: Impeachment is off the table, as confirmed from the many new "leaders" in the splitting factions of the Democratic Congressional majority.

True enough, too many of the Democrats support the Neo-cons and their fantasy land agenda. If push comes to shove this may change if the Democrats miraculously find their balls maybe a few of the Republicans that do not support a larger centralized government, the trashing of the bill of rights, constitution, wars for profit, torturing people, spying on US citizens etc.. Will remember what is to be conservative and stand with them to put the Trotsky influenced, war profiteering traitors out to pasture. Probably will not happen but it sure would be nice.

[JLB]

Charlie Man wrote: Leftist media knows train wrecks when they see them, huh? I'll assume you're including all media that don't agree with the neoconservative agenda into that group.

Does JLB know op ed pieces when he sees them? I've seen quite a number of editorials posted by various and sundry members who go on to try and genealize the opinions espoused by one columnist and fail. Like this. I guess the talking points are just telling you to manufacture a rift that deosn't exist in the democratic party.

Ah well, at least nobody's being fooled.

If you had clicked on the link, you would have seen the header saying: "Townhall, Where Your Opinion Counts".


You are just being too lazy to read the article. 8:)

[JLB]

[quote="Sands"] JLB wrote:

Quote: The text in this picture is meaningless partisan sh!t, like most of JLB's cheap graphics.

Those graphics cost millions to produce. 8:)



Quote: I think Murtha's checking out Nancy's butt.

That would explain the look of imminent regurgitation. :lol: