| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bunny
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 584
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:07 am Post subject: Saddam ordered to Hang |
|
|
Quote: Saddam Hussein sentenced to death
Saddam Hussein has been convicted of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death by hanging.
The former Iraqi president was convicted by a Baghdad court for his role in the killing of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail in 1982.
Linkage
So the USA invaded Iraq, so they could catch & convict Saddam of murdering less that 150 people.
This pre-election day PR, was brought to you by the Reblican Party, who are fighting democracy around the world, and creating new terrorist, with every breath we take. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Somebloke
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 2677
Location: London
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:13 am Post subject: Re: Saddam ordered to Hang |
|
|
bunny wrote: Quote: Saddam Hussein sentenced to death
Saddam Hussein has been convicted of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death by hanging.
The former Iraqi president was convicted by a Baghdad court for his role in the killing of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail in 1982.
Linkage
Just think of it as a silver lining.
Whatever the problems in Iraq- as well as the issues that I have with the people that planned it- Saddam committed acts of genocide. For that he should die, cleanly, quickly and in the full sight of the law.
So the USA invaded Iraq, so they could catch & convict Saddam of murdering less that 150 people.
This pre-election day PR, was brought to you by the Reblican Party, who are fighting democracy around the world, and creating new terrorist, with every breath we take. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Snake
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 21776
Location: e-Thuggin
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
see thread: verdict is in....
Saddam was sentanced by Iraqis, under Iraqi law. This is a good thing for Iraq. |
|
| Back to top |
|
puffin
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 1051
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well 'Bunny' are aware that there are/were 13 other trails scheduled against Sadam for genocide? If not you are now.
It only takes/needs one rope to hang anyone. Some of the Nazis in the Nuremburg trials were convicted of a few murders but the world knew they had been responsible, in some cases, for the deaths of tens of thousands.
You don't 'like' the fact that Sadam had to be stopped. The IAEA reports say he was within a year of having a nuclear bomb. What do you think the ME would have been like if he had remained in power AND had a nuke? |
|
| Back to top |
|
bunny
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 584
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
puffin wrote:
You don't 'like' the fact that Sadam had to be stopped. The IAEA reports say he was within a year of having a nuclear bomb. What do you think the ME would have been like if he had remained in power AND had a nuke?
ROFL... I think you should go back to Living in Fear & ignorance.
LOL - IAEA Reports = Saddam having Nukes in a Years time - LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
bunny
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 584
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is it just me, or are Mass Graves & Ethnic Cleansing more of problem now, than under Saddam. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CountryGuy
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 1027
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
bunny wrote: Is it just me, or are Mass Graves & Ethnic Cleansing more of problem now, than under Saddam.
Not just you -- You just hear about them more. But the media has the atrocities pretty well documented, and they are far worse than what's happened since Saddam fell.
So no, it was worse then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
bunny
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 584
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
CountryGuy wrote: bunny wrote: Is it just me, or are Mass Graves & Ethnic Cleansing more of problem now, than under Saddam.
Not just you -- You just hear about them more. But the media has the atrocities pretty well documented, and they are far worse than what's happened since Saddam fell.
So no, it was worse then.
LOL, totally disagree with you!
Iraq is more dangerous now, than it has ever been... |
|
| Back to top |
|
The Newb
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 2668
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
bunny wrote: CountryGuy wrote: bunny wrote: Is it just me, or are Mass Graves & Ethnic Cleansing more of problem now, than under Saddam.
Not just you -- You just hear about them more. But the media has the atrocities pretty well documented, and they are far worse than what's happened since Saddam fell.
So no, it was worse then.
LOL, totally disagree with you!
Iraq is more dangerous now, than it has ever been...
only for little fuzzy bunnies, the iraqis gotta eat you know :lol: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Spider
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
Posts: 8750
Location: Heart of the Valley, Oregon
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bottom Line:
The guy commited, was tried for, and was found guilty of crimes against humanity. Under Iraqi law, you commit these crimes, you hang.
Justice is being served.
Kinda like if you steal a car in Belgium, and the law says you go to jail for 5 years. (hypothetical) That means you go to jail for five years. Its pretty simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Refrozen Seabass
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 2867
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spider wrote: Bottom Line:
The guy commited, was tried for, and was found guilty of crimes against humanity. Under Iraqi law, you commit these crimes, you hang.
Justice is being served.
Justice demands a fair trial. This was not such a trial.
Quote: Kinda like if you steal a car in Belgium, and the law says you go to jail for 5 years. (hypothetical) That means you go to jail for five years. Its pretty simple.
The trials of Belgian car thieves aren't cut short before the defense has made its case.
As far as I know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
sherborne
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 800
Location: London
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CountryGuy wrote: bunny wrote: Is it just me, or are Mass Graves & Ethnic Cleansing more of problem now, than under Saddam.
Not just you -- You just hear about them more. But the media has the atrocities pretty well documented, and they are far worse than what's happened since Saddam fell.
So no, it was worse then.
Well according to Manfred Nowak, a UN investigator on cases of torture, torture and violence are now worse in Iraq than under Saddam Hussein! Now you have the police, army, insurgents, militias, americans and british carrying out acts of torture and violence whereas before it was mostly Saddam, who is only one oppressor, not 6! |
|
| Back to top |
|
violethunter
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Iraq invasion brought far more deaths and turned so many lives into miserable state than Saddam ever did. His crimes pale in comparision of what mr. Bush did since 2003.
Now Iraq is at risk of civil war, where thousands of lives will be lost, all for US ambitions and fake WMD claims. Saddam is a scum and will be remembered as such, but those who removed him from his throne are much worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
