Political Crossfire Forums

[psholtz]

MG1962 wrote: Quote: That was uncalled for. Psholtz is open-minded and readily considers what you have to say. If he wasn't open-minded then he wouldn't have considered a conspiracy theory in the first place. So how about YOU try to be more open-minded and get off your high horse.

Yes open enough to consider Ghandi a puppet of the NWO
I'm not an expert on that era of history, but it seems to be (from a high-level, cursory view) that Ghandi was a pawn - perhaps an almost completely unwitting pawn - of the Powers That Be in their struggle to retain control over India while - simultaneously - trying to make it look like they were losing control over India..

The Powers That Be have pulled off a similar stunt w/ great success here in America.

My suspicions are heightened by the fact that in the Feb 5, 1971 issue of Science magazine, the Communists Karl Deutsch, John Platt and Dieter Senghass of Harvard University wrote that the four most important political achievements of the 20th century were:

1. Soviet type of one-party state, developed by V. I. Lenin, 1917-21.
2. Large-scale nonviolent political action, M. K. Gandhi, 1918-34.
3. Peasant and geurilla organization and government, Mao Tse-Tung, 1929-49.
4. Cost benefit analysis (PPBS), Charles Hitch (1956-63).

That Ghandi's name would appear alongside such other prominent Communists as Lenin, Mao and Charles Hitch, straight from the mouth of the Harvard Communist priesthood, suggests to me that the real Ghandi may have had things going on that the uneducated public is not 100% aware of..

But that's just me.

You'll find a reference to this in the Don Bell Reports:

http://www.paulsholtz.com/donbell/db19_38.html