| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kane
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 10611
Location: Bay Area, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
That just as you can use one aspect of history to support your claim I can use it to support mine.
datura wrote:
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Which has what to do with anything? Now you've clearly missed my point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kane
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 10611
Location: Bay Area, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Don't be selective with your histroy. France also thought about coming to the aid of the South if they had won, without debate, the battle of Gettysburg. SO did England.
is your eyesight okay? because if you go back and read you'll discover it was not me who thru the first insult thanks very muchly.
btw i know all about the achievements and dominance of France post wwII.
I don't care who threw the first insult. You can't use one part of history just because it suits you better.
A little cocky are we? The fact that France didn't dominate at anything post WWII leads me to believe that you don't know as much as you say.
Domination = success? :? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Johannes
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 834
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Don't be selective with your histroy. France also thought about coming to the aid of the South if they had won, without debate, the battle of Gettysburg. SO did England.
is your eyesight okay? because if you go back and read you'll discover it was not me who thru the first insult thanks very muchly.
btw i know all about the achievements and dominance of France post wwII.
I don't care who threw the first insult. You can't use one part of history just because it suits you better.
A little cocky are we? The fact that France didn't dominate at anything post WWII leads me to believe that you don't know as much as you say.
Domination = success? :?
Domination = Domination |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kane
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 10611
Location: Bay Area, CA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Johannes wrote: Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Don't be selective with your histroy. France also thought about coming to the aid of the South if they had won, without debate, the battle of Gettysburg. SO did England.
is your eyesight okay? because if you go back and read you'll discover it was not me who thru the first insult thanks very muchly.
btw i know all about the achievements and dominance of France post wwII.
I don't care who threw the first insult. You can't use one part of history just because it suits you better.
A little cocky are we? The fact that France didn't dominate at anything post WWII leads me to believe that you don't know as much as you say.
Domination = success? :?
Domination = Domination
Are you intentionally ignoring the implication made by me or do you honestly not see my point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Johannes
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 834
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Don't be selective with your histroy. France also thought about coming to the aid of the South if they had won, without debate, the battle of Gettysburg. SO did England.
is your eyesight okay? because if you go back and read you'll discover it was not me who thru the first insult thanks very muchly.
btw i know all about the achievements and dominance of France post wwII.
I don't care who threw the first insult. You can't use one part of history just because it suits you better.
A little cocky are we? The fact that France didn't dominate at anything post WWII leads me to believe that you don't know as much as you say.
Domination = success? :?
Domination = Domination
Are you intentionally ignoring the implication made by me or do you honestly not see my point?
What point? The fact that the U.S. gaining very important, crucial, if not vital, assistance from the French in the Revolutionary War? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kane
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 10611
Location: Bay Area, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johannes wrote: Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: Kane wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Johannes wrote: datura wrote: Kane wrote: datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
Oooo...now we're justifying the French bashing with history? Let's go back to the US gaining it's independence...think hard now. :roll:
lol
American independence was only achieved because of France we all know this, what is your point?
Napoleon still had his arse exiled.
Don't be selective with your histroy. France also thought about coming to the aid of the South if they had won, without debate, the battle of Gettysburg. SO did England.
is your eyesight okay? because if you go back and read you'll discover it was not me who thru the first insult thanks very muchly.
btw i know all about the achievements and dominance of France post wwII.
I don't care who threw the first insult. You can't use one part of history just because it suits you better.
A little cocky are we? The fact that France didn't dominate at anything post WWII leads me to believe that you don't know as much as you say.
Domination = success? :?
Domination = Domination
Are you intentionally ignoring the implication made by me or do you honestly not see my point?
What point? The fact that the U.S. gaining very important, crucial, if not vital, assistance from the French in the Revolutionary War?
That you don't have to dominate in any field to be successful... |
|
| Back to top |
|
maxtsu
Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 1854
Location: European Union
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
datura wrote: maxtsu wrote: Limey Boosk wrote: Does anyone still listen to what France has to say.
Its just a nation full of poofs, muslims and the bloke off Green Card.
:?
They are about as useful as the popes balls.
Glad to see your bring interesting arguments to the table.
Yes, about as usefull as that Island in the West of Europe, the 51st state.
The one with its own currency, own language and that modenised the rest of the world with the industrial revolution before saving France from NAZI ways?
own currency?...and? ...so what? only matters if it is worth something.
own language...woop-a-dee-doo! congratulations..please take 10 points for observation.
NAZI ways?..oh dear..what is it about the english and the war? hasn't John Cleese taught you anything about the war yet?
What is it about the english, they always need someone to look down at. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Angelicus
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 4681
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so Chirac ALWAYS opposes sanctions, (he says so himself) he ALWAYS opposes millitary action too (again he says so himself).
So whats left, ask them nicely too stop supporting terrorists and trying to get nuclear bombs?
If we are too follow Chiracs line of thought, we might as well ship the nukes to tehran ourselves and be done with it all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Johannes
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 834
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Angelicus wrote: Ok so Chirac ALWAYS opposes sanctions, (he says so himself) he ALWAYS opposes millitary action too (again he says so himself).
So whats left, ask them nicely too stop supporting terrorists and trying to get nuclear bombs?
If we are too follow Chiracs line of thought, we might as well ship the nukes to tehran ourselves and be done with it all.
I believe, and I'll look for it, that awhile ago Chirac threatened nuclear retaliation against terrorist actions. I'll get a link when I find it.
Found it!
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3202958,00.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kane
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 10611
Location: Bay Area, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johannes wrote: Angelicus wrote: Ok so Chirac ALWAYS opposes sanctions, (he says so himself) he ALWAYS opposes millitary action too (again he says so himself).
So whats left, ask them nicely too stop supporting terrorists and trying to get nuclear bombs?
If we are too follow Chiracs line of thought, we might as well ship the nukes to tehran ourselves and be done with it all.
I believe, and I'll look for it, that awhile ago Chirac threatened nuclear retaliation against terrorist actions. I'll get a link when I find it.
Found it!
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3202958,00.html
What's this? All that French bashing is foolish? Color me surprised. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jimmy
Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 92
Location: Elkhart, IL
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the link:
Quote: Unprecedented threat: French President Chirac threatens nuclear response to terror attack on French soil. German intelligence: Iran 3-4 years away from acquiring nuclear bomb
So, not only is Chirac willing to do more about terrorism than Shrub, but looks like Shrub's inability to grasp standard diplomacy has Iran with nukes by 2010. Good job! :roll: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Snake
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 21776
Location: e-Thuggin
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
slimz wrote:
Russia has signed a deal in Moscow to launch Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr in September next year, officials in Moscow say.
They say the Russian-built reactor will be fully operational in November 2007.
Iran had feared Russia would delay the launch because of international tension over Iran's nuclear activities, correspondents say.
Didn't Clinton give Kimmy J Dawg teh Illest a nuclear reactor? Look what that idiot is doing with it.
Iran is practically swimming in oil, wtf do they need a nuclear reactor for? It's impractical, and the russians are stupid for making a deal with them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Limey Boosk
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 183
Location: Yorkshire, England
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: What is it about the english, they always need someone to look down at.
Nah, its just that we have earned that right because we have saved the world from tin-pot loons like Napolean and Hitler.
France? They think a victory is making a bunch of bored homesick English soldiers go back home with fingers smelling of Joan of Arc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
maxtsu
Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 1854
Location: European Union
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Limey Boosk wrote: Quote: What is it about the english, they always need someone to look down at.
Nah, its just that we have earned that right because we have saved the world from tin-pot loons like Napolean and Hitler.
France? They think a victory is making a bunch of bored homesick English soldiers go back home with fingers smelling of Joan of Arc.
And english think victory is when the supporters have smashed up the city center. And have being in running battles with the local riot police. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Spider
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
Posts: 7948
Location: Heart of the Valley, Oregon
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow. Watching the Brits and French bash on each other is a lot more entertaining that watching the Americans and French go at it. Although I guess these two have had additional centuries of practice. :sigh1: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Limey Boosk
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 183
Location: Yorkshire, England
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the french are about as popular in the world as a dog with a wet nose on a nudist beach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MoscowMatt
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 1635
Location: UK / Hungary
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Whilst we are up for some 'French bashing' was it Patton who said I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind?!! :lol: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Snake
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 21776
Location: e-Thuggin
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No, he said he'd rather have a german division in front of him than a russian division behind him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MoscowMatt
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 1635
Location: UK / Hungary
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kamel wrote: No, he said he'd rather have a german division in front of him than a russian division behind him.
Just looked it up and it is definatley French! The Russians were tenacious fighters for one!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
SpartanPhalanx
Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 2157
Location: 3rd rock
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Limey Boosk wrote: Quote: What is it about the english, they always need someone to look down at.
Nah, its just that we have earned that right because we have saved the world from tin-pot loons like Napolean and Hitler.
France? They think a victory is making a bunch of bored homesick English soldiers go back home with fingers smelling of Joan of Arc.
The English saved the world from Hitler?
Really?
Where would England be without the Americans saving their ass in 1942?
Churchill spent 2 years begging Roosevelt to enter the war and had the Japanese not attacked Pearl Harbour in Dec 1941, you'd probably be speaking German right now.
Furthermore, the Russians bore the brunt of casualties fighting the Germans so you can thank them too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
