Political Crossfire Forums

[Federation of the World]

A single global government system is inevitable. It will happen no matter what. When the American masses finally realize that they will be incorporated into the one world government system, how will the ensuing flood of nationalists who don’t want to relinquish their national sovereignty, be dealt with? Will it take another major catastrophe or terrorist attack to scare the American population into submission and ultimately force them to embrace the new order? Fear can and is being used to control the masses. The power that the mainstream media has to shape the opinions and views of the population is more powerful than any weapon. If you can control the hearts and minds of the population with fear, why even try to do it with open force? As this would ultimately result in pockets of the population resisting and taking up arms. I believe what is needed to avoid bloodshed, is to shape the opinions and views of the people, to make them think that being part of a one world government will solve all of their and the rest of the world’s troubles. But I fear that another attack or catastrophe on American soil that causes chaos nationwide, could be used as an opportunity to create the final order. The latter option is very dangerous I believe, because if the American masses do find out that the attack was another “conspiracy,” It could jeopardize the American population from ever embracing global government. It is much safer to portray the new order in such a way, they will ask for it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6739227220487922409&q=THEY+WANT+YOUR+SOUL

The video above portrays digital implants as being the mark of the beast. Many are associating this type of technology to that mark and in Christianity taking the beast’s mark is strictly forbidden. Many Christians will refuse to take the implants. How will they be dealt with? Will they be detained in holding centers like the one in the videos below for refusing to take the implants?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8272096722231303649&q=FEMA

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3855325228559640508&q=FEMA

I don't believe taking those kinds of steps to bring in the new order will be wise, as this to will most likely result in armed resistance. Again, it is much safer to have the people embrace and ask for global government. It must be portrayed as the only way to achieve peace.


How do you think global government could be implemented?

[Straudos]

Quote: How do you think global government could be implemented? I don't believe it will be for at the very least another 300 years or so, and by then we'll have blown up the planet anyway. The UN is a joke, and even the EU has hit a dead end. No powerful nation will willingly hand over its security to an outside force, and in an increasingly multipolar world system this means we'll see something similar to the Concert of Europe, except with nukes.

[rytis]

i think one world government has no chance of becoming, because let me explain: if one honest government would be, it would be great but first of all: for the ruling class who decide it all it is not to their advantage to have one world government, because they win by dividing and conquering, when countries fight, they need to borrow money from the bankers and then bankers own those countries... (read Adolph Hitler or any other smart persons explanation)

second of all (its the same really) this so calledgovernment has self interests, the reason they want to "unite" the countries is to have their friends owning all the contracts owning tv stations, oil industry, buildings etc. etc... no one will ever give into this.

the more power US is getting the more the world is turning against us until the bubble will burst from the inside... its a natural thing.

if we want a one world government (which i believe is a great thing) we need to end corruption/political prostitution in our own government first...

[micfranklin]

One world government would not happen, because you'd have several people wanting to be the head hancho of it all.

[Norrin Radd]

rytis wrote: i think one world government has no chance of becoming, because let me explain: if one honest government would be, it would be great but first of all: for the ruling class who decide it all it is not to their advantage to have one world government, because they win by dividing and conquering, when countries fight, they need to borrow money from the bankers and then bankers own those countries... (read Adolph Hitler or any other smart persons explanation)

second of all (its the same really) this so calledgovernment has self interests, the reason they want to "unite" the countries is to have their friends owning all the contracts owning tv stations, oil industry, buildings etc. etc... no one will ever give into this.

the more power US is getting the more the world is turning against us until the bubble will burst from the inside... its a natural thing.

if we want a one world government (which i believe is a great thing) we need to end corruption/political prostitution in our own government first...

God are you naive. The corruption in our government is what is LEADING US TOWARDS WORLD GOVERNMENT.

Ever read the document "Freedom From War"?

JFK presented the goals of that document to the UN.

The CFR has been pushing us towards world government for years. The foundations have been doing the same. You really need to do some reading.

[Norrin Radd]

micfranklin wrote: One world government would not happen, because you'd have several people wanting to be the head hancho of it all.

One of the lamest statements I have ever seen.

Ever hear of the Reece Committee?

Ever hear of Col. House, Norman Dodd, Rene Wormser, Richard Gardner, Zbigniew Brzezinski or read what Barry Goldwater told us was the goal of the Trilateral Commission?

You people are so ignorant it is beyond pathetic.

You have access to all the information you need to educate yourselves, yet you still know little to nothing about what is really going on in the world.

DO SOME READING. It won't kill you, honest.

[US_Republican]

Personally I believe it will never happen. The closest the world has ever been to that was the Roman Empire which lasted an astounding 507 years compared to America's 230 years, beginning July 4, 2006. With America living in this day and age could easily out bid Rome, with 600 years. especially with America, China, and Russia remaining, the thought of a single world government is out of our's, and our children's children's children's etc. reach.

Not that I use the bible much for conversation... but watching the History Channel you learn alot about the end of time and a single powerful organization is usually involved... so as long as Christianity is around (particularly Evangelists) it could never happen.

[rytis]

Norrin Radd wrote: rytis wrote: i think one world government has no chance of becoming, because let me explain: if one honest government would be, it would be great but first of all: for the ruling class who decide it all it is not to their advantage to have one world government, because they win by dividing and conquering, when countries fight, they need to borrow money from the bankers and then bankers own those countries... (read Adolph Hitler or any other smart persons explanation)

second of all (its the same really) this so calledgovernment has self interests, the reason they want to "unite" the countries is to have their friends owning all the contracts owning tv stations, oil industry, buildings etc. etc... no one will ever give into this.

the more power US is getting the more the world is turning against us until the bubble will burst from the inside... its a natural thing.

if we want a one world government (which i believe is a great thing) we need to end corruption/political prostitution in our own government first...

God are you naive. The corruption in our government is what is LEADING US TOWARDS WORLD GOVERNMENT.

one world government would mean no more wars between countries. if you imagine a one world corrupt government as in USA, it will never happen, because US goverment is as corrupt as a dying prostitutes body.

[cap'n queasy]

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way back to where you came from.

[rytis]

no wonder the asswipe was on ignore, back on there u go bro

[Federation of the World]

Any man who stands in the way of the aspirations of those who hold the seats of true power, have no chance of overcoming them who are in total control. Those who have tried to come against them have always been dealt with.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=642552841321950688&q=new+world+order

The video above contains a very illuminating public speech by the late John F. Kennedy. In the speech he voices his concerns about those who hold the true positions of power. Was he rewarded for his display of good will to the people? Was he celebrated for trying to show them the perils that they are unknowingly facing? The videos below portray yet another feeble attempt by those who wish to expose the secrets that have for good reason, been kept from the masses. Will it benefit you in any way to know these things?


ILLUMINATI part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4033945524259164574&q=The+Illuminati+-+All+Conspiracy+No+Theory

ILLUMINATI part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-383825970511631644&q=The+Illuminati+-+All+Conspiracy+No+Theory

BOHEMIAN GROVE
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1358319439993514946&q=Bohemian+Grove

TERROR STORM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569&q=Terror+Storm

A global government is coming and there is nothing that can be done to stop it. You can either accept this fact or face the consequences for your inability to accept that which must take place.

[Aim-64C]

I beleive it's going to be a reality within the next couple decades.

The world needs hope. The world needs something to look forward to. All of the pieces are in place. We've been deluded with ideals of world peace for a long time. If such an organization comes to existance that shows the power to achieve a state of non-violence between the countries that are part of it - the U.S. public will, on a general note, sell themselves out to it.

Being "head hancho" of it isn't really an issue. Control is through an organization with set goals - one of them being this.

I see China as being highly involved in this - possibly by providing 'assistance' with 'domestic control' in countries that grow heavy with disputes, protesting, and rioting.

The U.S. is moving somewhat towards civil war. When this happens - it will all begin to fall into place.

I pray to God I'm wrong - because it's going to be a really crappy time to live in... but... the sooner it happens - the less we have to worry about it happening.

[Free Thinkr]

Aim-64C wrote: I pray to God I'm wrong - because it's going to be a really crappy time to live in... but... the sooner it happens - the less we have to worry about it happening.
Stop moaning and touch your toes, brother Winston. ;)

[Aim-64C]

I guess that one is beyond me, there....

Seriously - I think it will happen. Although I try not to be assinine about it....

But there again - I am prettty darn paranoid.... But, taking a look around - I guess I ain't so bad.... :lol:

And people on other forums call me paranoid......

[Todd D.]

I think the merit of a world government is entirely in the technology that exists for its administration. Think about it, what is the functional difference between a Democratic Republic that is worldwide in scale as opposed to one that is nationwide, provided that the technology exists to make such an idea feasible?

I would imagine that the asme concerns you have over world government are the ones that our ancestors 200 years ago had over taking power away from the States and consolidating it within the Federal Government.

[Free Thinkr]

Aim-64C wrote: I guess that one is beyond me, there....
1984. You know, like they're fixing to install a telescreen in your room and have forced calisthenics every morning.

[Aim-64C]

Ah - okay, I haven't read 1984 yet.

I have read "This Perfect Day" - by Ira Levin - that one's pretty good if you can get your hands on it. It's almost the same thing - only written before 1984. The concept is a little different, although ALL of the technology in the book is in our world now - actually, we have better technology. But Ira Levin is often given sort of a prophetical stance as his books often detailed technology that have come into being.

There was a thing on the Discovery Channel or the History Channel (can't remember which, now) that had his works featured.

[Free Thinkr]

Aim-64C wrote: Ah - okay, I haven't read 1984 yet.

I have read "This Perfect Day" - by Ira Levin - that one's pretty good if you can get your hands on it. It's almost the same thing - only written before 1984. The concept is a little different, although ALL of the technology in the book is in our world now - actually, we have better technology. But Ira Levin is often given sort of a prophetical stance as his books often detailed technology that have come into being.

There was a thing on the Discovery Channel or the History Channel (can't remember which, now) that had his works featured.
I'll have to check it out; have you read "Brave New World?" I'm a fan of dystopian novels, though, as they give you bona-fide scenarios to live in fear of! ;) 8:)

ETA: my library doesn't carry it -boooo! Though, notably, it has "The Stepford Wives" and "Rosemary's Baby," which are apparently written by the same author.

[Aim-64C]

No - I haven't been to a library in so long.....

I go through books like some people go through popcorn when I get them...... I went to a book store and bought 7 books - all of them gone in under 2 months.

Several of them were from the Mech Warrior series, most of the others were from Dale Brown, Tom Clancy (The Bear and The Dragon - that's a good one), and Dan Brown (interesting books - if not based off of some finiky info).

Dale Brown was an RN (Radar-Navigator) on the B-52s and has a series of books starting with "Flight of the Old Dog" - which is sort of like a crazy suicide mission into Russia - then picks up with "Night of The Hawk" - which deals with ANOTHER crazy mission into the lesser states of the former USSR, then picks up with the "Dreamland" series - all basing off of the past events and former characters.

I've read most of the DreamLand series - and Night of the Hawk - I have not read the first Dreamland book or Flight of the Old Dog.

I also have some from H. Jay Riker - who has written a series of books following the carreer of a fictional character through command of different subs from the Los Angelas class, the Sea Wolf class, and the newest Virginia Class boats.

I'm heavy into the military fiction - which is probably where a lot of my paranoid ideas about China come from - since about half of those involve conflict with China.

[Federation of the World]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7721834068111445869&q=American+Scholars+Symposium

When secrets are exposed, it puts the security of the entire nation on the line, are the people in the video above really helping the American population, or are they endangering their lives? Some secrets are better left untold.