Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

The fatty ban
Click here to go to the original topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Society
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Atlas Bergeron



Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 2680
Location: Reality

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:24 pm    Post subject: The fatty ban  

1. People who eat too many fatty foods get heart attacks and cost alot in medical bills.
2. The government's job is to protect people by whatever means necessary
therefore, 3. the government should ban all fatty foods.

We could call it "The Fatty War"
Back to top  
Rhoades



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1169
Location: Pennsylvania

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:26 pm    Post subject:  

Statement number two is wrong.
Back to top  
Otacon



Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 2548
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject:  

No. Let people eat whatever the f**k they want to. If they die, it helps thin the population. It's not the government's responsiblity to keep you alive.
Back to top  
thefranzkafkafront



Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 19740
Location: Edinburgh University.

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:42 pm    Post subject:  

Rhoades wrote: Statement number two is wrong.

Yeap.

the only justified reason for the existance of goverment is to prosecute thouse who violate the rights of others.

By removing the ability of people to choose what foods they wish to eat, you are supressing their liberty.

Egro a goverment that dose ban fatty foods negates its own justification for existance.
Back to top  
Fiduciary



Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 2882
Location: America the Beautiful

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:45 pm    Post subject:  

"The government's job is to protect people by whatever means necessary "

Where in the world did you get that belief?

It's plainly wrong.

The result of poor education?
Back to top  
Green



Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1459
Location: The State of America

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:48 pm    Post subject:  

Meta rights- the right to refuse other rights.
Back to top  
thefranzkafkafront



Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 19740
Location: Edinburgh University.

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:49 pm    Post subject:  

Green wrote: Meta rights- the right to refuse other rights.

Thats not what Meta-rights is, meta-rights is the willful release of the individuals rights by the individual himself.
Back to top  
The Comrade



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 12039
Location: Zagreb

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:53 pm    Post subject: Re: The fatty ban  

Atlas Bergeron wrote: 1. People who eat too many fatty foods get heart attacks and cost alot in medical bills.
2. The government's job is to protect people by whatever means necessary
therefore, 3. the government should ban all fatty foods.

We could call it "The Fatty War"


were you getting stoned with your friends when you thought this up? or is it supposed to be a satire?
Back to top  
Atlas Bergeron



Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 2680
Location: Reality

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:59 pm    Post subject:  

Rhoades wrote: Statement number two is wrong.

Obviously. Its a satire against banning alchohol for people under 21, since that most affects me. But it also deals with all drug bans.

And no, I wasn't stoned, am not stoned, and have never been stoned.
Back to top  
Jim Nightshade



Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 863

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:59 pm    Post subject:  

thefranzkafkafront wrote: Rhoades wrote: Statement number two is wrong.

Yeap.

the only justified reason for the existance of goverment is to prosecute thouse who violate the rights of others.

By removing the ability of people to choose what foods they wish to eat, you are supressing their liberty.

Egro a goverment that dose ban fatty foods negates its own justification for existance.


They should be banned from restaurants as they advocate an un-healthy lifestyles like smokers do in bars (Or at least charge them a cover charge as a liberal suggested for smokers). Also their fat gives off "Second -Hand Fat" which endangers thin people to take up fatness....Next people that drink a beer!
Back to top  
Revenant



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 17852
Location: Bliss

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:00 pm    Post subject:  

Bad satire makes baby Jesus cry.

Back to top  
micfranklin



Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 10004
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:05 pm    Post subject: Re: The fatty ban  

Atlas Bergeron wrote: 1. People who eat too many fatty foods get heart attacks and cost alot in medical bills.
2. The government's job is to protect people by whatever means necessary
therefore, 3. the government should ban all fatty foods.

We could call it "The Fatty War"

That's a stupid idea. Why? Because the government (or anyone else) shouldn't be deciding what we can and can't eat.
Back to top  
The Comrade



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 12039
Location: Zagreb

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:09 pm    Post subject:  

Atlas Bergeron wrote: Rhoades wrote: Statement number two is wrong.

Obviously. Its a satire against banning alchohol for people under 21, since that most affects me. But it also deals with all drug bans.

And no, I wasn't stoned, am not stoned, and have never been stoned.


terrible satire.


it's also a terrible comparison.

if you eat a cheeseburger, your heart doesn't explode, your teeth don't rot, you don't get holes in your nose etc etc etc.

when you eat a cheeseburger, you don't veer off the road because you black out(unless you get the itis).
Back to top  
Jim Nightshade



Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 863

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:19 pm    Post subject:  

Quote: terrible satire.


it's also a terrible comparison.

if you eat a cheeseburger, your heart doesn't explode, your teeth don't rot, you don't get holes in your nose etc etc etc.

when you eat a cheeseburger, you don't veer off the road because you black out(unless you get the itis).


I believe the leading cause of death is still a bad diet or booze or drugs?
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8882

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:26 pm    Post subject:  

Atlas Bergeron wrote: Obviously. Its a satire against banning alchohol for people under 21, since that most affects me. But it also deals with all drug bans.

And no, I wasn't stoned, am not stoned, and have never been stoned.

So you're saying "If I don't get to drink, then no body else gets to eat!" ?

This sounds really immature, and whiny...

The reason that the drinking age is 21 is because parts of the brain are still developing until that age, and alcohol can stunt that growth.

The problem with that is that the government is protecting people's brains by not letting them have alcohol, but they're perfectly ok with giving an "underdeveloped brain" a rifle?

Personally, I think it's a state's issue. On top of that, if someone can die for my country, they earned the right to have a beer.

Personal Note: I'm 18, and I don't drink.
Back to top  
Jim Nightshade



Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 863

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:35 pm    Post subject:  

Quote: Quote: The problem with that is that the government is protecting people's brains by not letting them have alcohol , but they're perfectly ok with giving an "underdeveloped brain" a rifle?

Are the Kennedy`s in charge of that Govt. program?
Back to top  
War Approving Democrat



Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 422

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:37 pm    Post subject:  

thefranzkafkafront wrote: Rhoades wrote: Statement number two is wrong.

Yeap.

the only justified reason for the existance of goverment is to prosecute thouse who violate the rights of others.

By removing the ability of people to choose what foods they wish to eat, you are supressing their liberty.

Egro a goverment that dose ban fatty foods negates its own justification for existance.

Agreed
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8882

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:40 pm    Post subject:  

Jim Nightshade wrote: Are the Kennedy`s in charge of that Govt. program?

...?

When was the last time a Kennedy was president?

Selective Service is under the jurisdiction of the executive branch.
Back to top  
Otacon



Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 2548
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:41 pm    Post subject:  

Jim Nightshade wrote: Quote: terrible satire.


it's also a terrible comparison.

if you eat a cheeseburger, your heart doesn't explode, your teeth don't rot, you don't get holes in your nose etc etc etc.

when you eat a cheeseburger, you don't veer off the road because you black out(unless you get the itis).


I believe the leading cause of death is still a bad diet or booze or drugs?

That may be true, but we should let people die of bad diet and/or booze and drugs. If they want to waste their lives away doing such things, then they have that right. It is not the government's job to keep you alive. You should be allowed to eat all the unhealthy food you want to. You have the right to kill yourself.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8882

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:47 pm    Post subject:  

Americans
Supporting
Smoking,
Heroin, and
Other
Life
Ending
Substances

"Keep smoking... we want you to die!"

If only that were a real interest group...
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Society Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group