Political Crossfire Forums

[The Comrade]

The Grandmaster wrote: The Comrade wrote: Hypocritical_Hypocrisy wrote: There is no way to manipulate morality like that. It's not a freakin' lightbulb. It's a different situation entirely when the mother's life is in peril. I believe that is one of the only times that abortions are under any means justifiable. Anything other than that is just a lack of responsibility for what they have done. There is no change of what the baby really is, a baby. But in choices concerning their mortality, I believe the mother is in her rights to terminate the baby.


kill the mother to let the child live. one life for another.

thus the life cycle is complete.

it seems moral to me. why is it all of a sudden to save the mother you can kil lthe baby?

do you care more for the mother then the innocent unborn?

I am safe in assuming you are being sarcastic, correct?


personally i put the mother at more value. i'm just using an extreme example to show how flawed the logic of "well if only a few die it's okay"

so yes, i was being sarcastic...sort of?(sorry if i sound muddled. i'm exhausted and with my insomnia i can't sleep).

apparently, that unborn mass of cells is equal to any human life, BUT why is it okay to kill it to save the mother?


because deep down pro-life people put far more value in the mother then they put in the unborn child but they won't admit to it.