| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
FarPastGone
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 540
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:31 pm Post subject: 9/11 Inside Job Report (Another One) |
|
|
I usually don't take any of these two heart, but this report by Dr. Steven Jones (Physics teacher from BYU, teacher of 20 years at BYU) is pretty interesting.
I am not sure if this has been posted before or not, so sorry if it has.
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/WTC-Jones19mar06.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
Patriot911
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 6937
Location: Denver, CO
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Its been posted, reposted, re-reposted, re-re-reposted, re-re-re-reposted. You get the idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FarPastGone
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 540
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ooops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Patriot911
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 6937
Location: Denver, CO
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context. |
|
| Back to top |
|
NAB
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 13543
Location: Where the stars at night, are big and bright
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Indeed. I read something recently that he was having a schism with Morgan Reynolds and one of the other "scholars". Isn't Reynolds one of the people claiming that commercials planes didn't hit the towers? If that's so, I would imagine that Steven Jones might consider distancing himself somewhat.
I'll do some digging, because I remember reading something on the net that stated that Steven Jones has backed away from his initial claims, but I don't remember where I read it. I could be wrong on that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
psholtz
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 23468
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Major flaws such as? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Patriot911
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 6937
Location: Denver, CO
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Major flaws such as?
Why should we answer your questions when you "can't be bothered" to answer ours? |
|
| Back to top |
|
psholtz
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 23468
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patriot911 wrote: psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Major flaws such as?
Why should we answer your questions when you "can't be bothered" to answer ours?
Thanks for answering my question.. :-D
I'll take it that there are no problems whatsoever w/ Dr. Jones information, then.. :wink: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Patriot911
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 6937
Location: Denver, CO
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Major flaws such as?
Why should we answer your questions when you "can't be bothered" to answer ours?
Thanks for answering my question.. :-D
I'll take it that there are no problems whatsoever w/ Dr. Jones information, then.. :wink:
Then I will take it everything else I've posted is true and correct since you've been unable / unwilling to prove anything is wrong with it. ;-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
letfreedomring
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 857
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Patriot911 wrote: psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: psholtz wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Its an interesting theory, but has some major flaws in it. Steven Jones is actually the most credible person the conspiracy side has going for it. Unfortunately for him he seems to always have to fight the other conspiracy nuts not to take him out of context.
Major flaws such as?
Why should we answer your questions when you "can't be bothered" to answer ours?
Thanks for answering my question.. :-D
I'll take it that there are no problems whatsoever w/ Dr. Jones information, then.. :wink:
Then I will take it everything else I've posted is true and correct since you've been unable / unwilling to prove anything is wrong with it. ;-)
:tu: |
|
| Back to top |
|
metalan1
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 318
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How about you post your flaws , and we answer your questions. Sound fair ? So go, start asking and post your flaws about htis theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
