Political Crossfire Forums

[Robodoon]

28-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job
Highlights missing Pentagon trillions as potential motive

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 7 2006

A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.

Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies.

In Christison's recent article, Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11 , he afforded credibility to the notion that "significant parts" of the official 9/11 story were false and after careful research he concluded that the twin towers and building 7, "were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings."

Christison went further on The Alex Jones Show, agreeing that the attacks being an inside job was the "most likely possibility."

"David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too," said Christison.

Christison initially approached the subject unwilling to even consider that elements of the government could be engaged in such heights of criminality but his research quickly began to change his mind.

"Just about half a year ago it dawned on me that not only was I trying to avoid an issue that might be extraordinarily important - more important than any other issue," said Christison.

"I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen."



Christison (pictured) stated that the suspicious collapse of the three buildings, including building 7 which wasn't hit by a plane, were likely the result of controlled demolitions.

"The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes."

"All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions."



Referencing the 2.3 trillion dollars that was discovered to be missing from the Pentagon's coffers, Christison emphasized the fact that with an unlimited budget, the scope of operations that could be undertaken by the military-industrial complex are almost without recourse.

"There is so much money now sloshing around throughout not only the CIA but the intelligence components of the Defense Department - which are actually bigger than the CIA - that these guys can do almost anything they want these days."

Christison said that one of the subsidiary motives behind 9/11 was to take attention away from an impending exposure of the missing trillions and criminal proceedings against high officials - just as LBJ had Kennedy assassinated partly to delay imminent corruption probes that would have sent him to prison.

Christison is just the latest in a deluge of former government and intelligence agency insiders to boldly go public with their doubts about the official story behind 9/11 and he has an urgent message for future whistleblowers who might be considering the same course of action.

"We have got to be willing to be discredited, we have got to stick our necks out - this is just plain too important."

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cia_official_says_911_inside_job.htm

Comment: got another one who doubts big brothers tale

[Revenant]

NOD did it. Stop with the disinformation.

[psholtz]

I concur w/ Chrisiton..

9/11 was an (obvious) inside job by the U.S. government..

The next step is to have the criminals in question arrested and prosecuted for high treason.

Cheney is the lead suspect, I understand..

[Patriot911]

Yeah, this guy has lots of credibility and inside information. :roll: He hasn't been with the CIA since 79. Hell, he has been out of the CIA almost as long as he was in it! As for his motives, he has been an anti-Bush activist for many years now. Activists have a long history of escalating their accusations when they find out nobody gives a s**t about their cause. He makes it sound like he was a good little government soldier until about half a year ago. bulls**t! Him and his wife have been actively campaigning against the Bush administration/Israel and for Palestine.

So what proof does he bring? None. Just another opinion. He is entitled to his opinion, but he is also working under flawed logic that I would bet is intentionally misleading.

Take the 2.3 trillion he is talking about. He makes it sound like the whole 2.3 trillion was taken by the Bush administration to pay for 9/11 and that 9/11 was actually a cover up for the missing money. :roll:

If you take a closer look at this you would realize that the 2.3 trillion would have had to have been accumulated over decades. In 2005 the military budget was 518 billion dollars. That was for the whole year. How is Bush suppose to get four times the entire military budget in under 9 months? :lol:

[Wizard From Oz]

Quote: A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.



Wow he used his conviction!!!!! better step guys - you what that means now

[Otacon]

Just because some dude says that he agrees with the conspiracy doesn't make it true. Next.

[Free Thinkr]

How much you wanna bet a book elaborating further is on the way; only $29.99, and you too can know what really happend. :rotf:

[letfreedomring]

--------------------------------------------
"I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen."
--------------------------------------------

so which is it??? what a media w****....

[Robodoon]

Revenant wrote: NOD did it. Stop with the disinformation.

?

[Robodoon]

psholtz wrote: I concur w/ Chrisiton..

9/11 was an (obvious) inside job by the U.S. government..

The next step is to have the criminals in question arrested and prosecuted for high treason.

Cheney is the lead suspect, I understand..

well thats the trouble, how do we hold these fellows and more so their bosses to account?

The courts are for the most part in the pockets of the elites....well most things are.

[Robodoon]

Patriot911 wrote: Yeah, this guy has lots of credibility and inside information. :roll: He hasn't been with the CIA since 79. Hell, he has been out of the CIA almost as long as he was in it! As for his motives, he has been an anti-Bush activist for many years now. Activists have a long history of escalating their accusations when they find out nobody gives a s**t about their cause. He makes it sound like he was a good little government soldier until about half a year ago. bulls**t! Him and his wife have been actively campaigning against the Bush administration/Israel and for Palestine.

So what proof does he bring? None. Just another opinion. He is entitled to his opinion, but he is also working under flawed logic that I would bet is intentionally misleading.

Take the 2.3 trillion he is talking about. He makes it sound like the whole 2.3 trillion was taken by the Bush administration to pay for 9/11 and that 9/11 was actually a cover up for the missing money. :roll:

If you take a closer look at this you would realize that the 2.3 trillion would have had to have been accumulated over decades. In 2005 the military budget was 518 billion dollars. That was for the whole year. How is Bush suppose to get four times the entire military budget in under 9 months? :lol:

Former Bush Admin Economist Says Official Story of WTC Collapse 'Bogus'
http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=305978#post305978

[Patriot911]

Robodoon wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Yeah, this guy has lots of credibility and inside information. :roll: He hasn't been with the CIA since 79. Hell, he has been out of the CIA almost as long as he was in it! As for his motives, he has been an anti-Bush activist for many years now. Activists have a long history of escalating their accusations when they find out nobody gives a s**t about their cause. He makes it sound like he was a good little government soldier until about half a year ago. bulls**t! Him and his wife have been actively campaigning against the Bush administration/Israel and for Palestine.

So what proof does he bring? None. Just another opinion. He is entitled to his opinion, but he is also working under flawed logic that I would bet is intentionally misleading.

Take the 2.3 trillion he is talking about. He makes it sound like the whole 2.3 trillion was taken by the Bush administration to pay for 9/11 and that 9/11 was actually a cover up for the missing money. :roll:

If you take a closer look at this you would realize that the 2.3 trillion would have had to have been accumulated over decades. In 2005 the military budget was 518 billion dollars. That was for the whole year. How is Bush suppose to get four times the entire military budget in under 9 months? :lol:

Former Bush Admin Economist Says Official Story of WTC Collapse 'Bogus'
http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=305978#post305978

Yet he has no proof either. If you're going to spam the boards with every person who doesn't believe the official story does this mean I can spam you with everyone who DOES believe the official story? ;-)

[Robodoon]

MG1962 wrote: Quote: A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.



Wow he used his conviction!!!!! better step guys - you what that means now

Well its nice to see he is steping up, he said for years he didn't want to think about it, then he felt he had to take a look....so thats good .

We are getting a very big collection of people saying we have been zoomed.

[Robodoon]

Otacon wrote: Just because some dude says that he agrees with the conspiracy doesn't make it true. Next.

Just because the government says something happened doesn't make it truth ;)

The real conspiracy Theory is the government line.

[Patriot911]

Robodoon wrote: psholtz wrote: I concur w/ Chrisiton..

9/11 was an (obvious) inside job by the U.S. government..

The next step is to have the criminals in question arrested and prosecuted for high treason.

Cheney is the lead suspect, I understand..

well thats the trouble, how do we hold these fellows and more so their bosses to account?

The courts are for the most part in the pockets of the elites....well most things are.

See, the first thing you need is evidence against someone before you can arrest them, much less prosecute them. Since you have no evidence other than heresay and conjecture, how are you going to get anyone to take you seriously enough to press charges?

[Patriot911]

Robodoon wrote: Otacon wrote: Just because some dude says that he agrees with the conspiracy doesn't make it true. Next.

Just because the government says something happened doesn't make it truth ;)

The real conspiracy Theory is the government line.

Except the government "theory" is backed up by hard evidence, experts and a guy who has admitted doing it and has released videos from before 9/11 showing the planning of 9/11.

The conspiracy theory that the government was behind it? Well it doesn't have dick.

[Robodoon]

Free Thinkr wrote: How much you wanna bet a book elaborating further is on the way; only $29.99, and you too can know what really happend. :rotf:

Well thats sort of simplistic.
What if he does, how would you pay for the production of materials?
America is a big place, I bet most of the people who are trying to expose what happened would love to give away all their books and films...but sadly they don't have the money.

But some people do, and give away DVD's for free, but then someone else will find another reason why thats a bad thing too.

The fact of the matter is, that people don't want to think about this stuff, so what ever people do to expose it, those who don't want to know will keep finding reasons not to look.

Get your FREE DVD http://www.reopen911.org/
And a Millon dollar reward.

[Robodoon]

letfreedomring wrote: --------------------------------------------
"I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen."
--------------------------------------------

so which is it??? what a media w****....

;)

Well that might be due to all the lying they are doing and lack of evidence in their claims

[Robodoon]

Patriot911 wrote: Robodoon wrote: Patriot911 wrote: Yeah, this guy has lots of credibility and inside information. :roll: He hasn't been with the CIA since 79. Hell, he has been out of the CIA almost as long as he was in it! As for his motives, he has been an anti-Bush activist for many years now. Activists have a long history of escalating their accusations when they find out nobody gives a s**t about their cause. He makes it sound like he was a good little government soldier until about half a year ago. bulls**t! Him and his wife have been actively campaigning against the Bush administration/Israel and for Palestine.

So what proof does he bring? None. Just another opinion. He is entitled to his opinion, but he is also working under flawed logic that I would bet is intentionally misleading.

Take the 2.3 trillion he is talking about. He makes it sound like the whole 2.3 trillion was taken by the Bush administration to pay for 9/11 and that 9/11 was actually a cover up for the missing money. :roll:

If you take a closer look at this you would realize that the 2.3 trillion would have had to have been accumulated over decades. In 2005 the military budget was 518 billion dollars. That was for the whole year. How is Bush suppose to get four times the entire military budget in under 9 months? :lol:

Former Bush Admin Economist Says Official Story of WTC Collapse 'Bogus'
http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=305978#post305978

Yet he has no proof either. If you're going to spam the boards with every person who doesn't believe the official story does this mean I can spam you with everyone who DOES believe the official story? ;-)

Well there a lot of "TV Watchers" out there, I guess you better get started typing ;)

And what do you mean proof, what every is out side of the Government line you attack it.

There is lots of proof, but....

[psholtz]

Robodoon wrote: psholtz wrote: I concur w/ Chrisiton..

9/11 was an (obvious) inside job by the U.S. government..

The next step is to have the criminals in question arrested and prosecuted for high treason.

Cheney is the lead suspect, I understand..

well thats the trouble, how do we hold these fellows and more so their bosses to account?

The courts are for the most part in the pockets of the elites....well most things are.
We need to form our own courts, brother.. :-)

It's called the Common Law Court Movement.

We need to get out of the admirality kangaroo courts, and start working w/ the Constitution again. If the "elected officials" refuse to do this for us, then under the 7th Amendment of Constitution, we the people have the right (and the responsibility) to do it for ourselves.