Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

Whats your view on Execution?
Click here to go to the original topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Society
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:14 pm    Post subject: Whats your view on Execution?  

I dont believe the state should be able to take what they cant give back.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:36 pm    Post subject:  

i really want to know.
Back to top  
Demonic Spoon



Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 6801
Location: Ohio

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:44 pm    Post subject:  

Sentences should be delivered based on what will end up with the best result. Considering the insane cost of killing someone due to the precautions to make sure it's not a wrongful arrest, it simply accomplishes nothing. This is in addition to the fact that there's already a huge margin of error.

Plus, death penalty gives no chance to release someone on parole.
Back to top  
Rankor and Pissing



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 9449

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:48 pm    Post subject:  

Demonic Spoon wrote: Sentences should be delivered based on what will end up with the best result. The best result for whom?

Demonic Spoon wrote: Considering the insane cost of killing someone due to the precautions to make sure it's not a wrongful arrest, it simply accomplishes nothing. This is in addition to the fact that there's already a huge margin of error.

Plus, death penalty gives no chance to release someone on parole.

I'd just point out bullets are cheaper...

I've got no problem with the death penalty. The laws allow for wave after wave of appeals. This commonly takes up to 20 years... 20 years on death row before the appeals run out. If 20 years can't convince people, sorry... time to pay the piper.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:50 pm    Post subject:  

i agree and i cant really understand except through the way the state see's it. JUSTIFICATION
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:56 pm    Post subject: Thats how we role  

Being a just nation is hat our culture is based on in our society we need to feel justified.
Back to top  
spearsy23



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 5597
Location: Fulton, Ks

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:58 pm    Post subject:  

after a jury has found the defendant guilty of murder, leave it up to the family and they can pick one person to have a gladiator duel with the murderer. If the murderer wins he gets life if he loses well to bad.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:03 pm    Post subject: ...  

what if they kill each other its a possibility. That would be the loss of 2 peaople and one of those people are innocent
Back to top  
spearsy23



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 5597
Location: Fulton, Ks

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:04 pm    Post subject: Re: ...  

inmylineofsight wrote: what if they kill each other its a possibility. That would be the loss of 2 peaople and one of those people are innocent
They volunteered for it.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:13 pm    Post subject: ...  

well either way the man on trial would not have a choice and couldnt volunteer he has no choice in the matter his fate is sealed by the state. I f the state refuses the death penalty than no one would have to volunteer to fight and no life would be lost. besides life in prison is more painful than death. The sword can kill you once but the pen can kill you twice.
Back to top  
Slythe



Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 1573
Location: US of A

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:20 pm    Post subject:  

In my opinion only those that commit the most henious crimes should be executed. Serial killers for instance. Or the nutty kid that goes on a shooting spree. Both usuaully have overwhelming evidence and should not be on deathrow for no more than a year, let alone twenty. The only three methods of execution is by shooting, gas or good ol sparky. The needle is too good for them.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:30 pm    Post subject: ...  

But my point is that there is no compensation by the state for taking the life of a person
Back to top  
Rankor and Pissing



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 9449

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:33 pm    Post subject:  

inmylineofsight wrote: i agree and i cant really understand except through the way the state see's it. JUSTIFICATION

It could be a "lack of Justification" to keep this person alive longer than the appeals process provides, given that a jury of his peers has not only convicted him/her but that a sentence of "death" has been levied.
Back to top  
inmylineofsight



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: wilmington

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:38 pm    Post subject:  

an eye for an eye is all it is
Back to top  
eynon



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 18630
Location: Minneapolis......

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:44 pm    Post subject:  

My state hasn't executed some-one since 1994, since then our murder rate has plumeted......our legal system is far from perfect, nor do we need to be killing people so I think my state should drop it....not that it matters, we only have 7 guys on death row and none of them are schedualed to get the needle so for all intents and purposes we don't have the death penalty.

however if Texas wants to give em the dose more power to em........
Back to top  
Demonic Spoon



Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 6801
Location: Ohio

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:09 pm    Post subject:  

Quote: The best result for whom? everyone


Quote:

I'd just point out bullets are cheaper...

I've got no problem with the death penalty. The laws allow for wave after wave of appeals. This commonly takes up to 20 years... 20 years on death row before the appeals run out. If 20 years can't convince people, sorry... time to pay the piper.

20 years and yet STILL people are found innocent.

Tell me, what does killing them solve?
Back to top  
Selfish_Meme



Joined: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 726

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:28 am    Post subject:  

I agree, it is too expensive to kill them, unless you want to adopt kangaroo courts.
Back to top  
Wizard From Oz



Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 10367
Location: Kansas

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:38 am    Post subject:  

Capital punishment proves nothing. We have not had the Death Penalty for about 50 years. Although the odd crime comes up that some feels justifies such a punishment, by and large we are happy with our choices.
Back to top  
Selfish_Meme



Joined: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 726

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:10 am    Post subject:  

I'm waiting for someone to suggest tracking down that stingray though....
Back to top  
Wizard From Oz



Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 10367
Location: Kansas

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:14 am    Post subject:  

Quote: I'm waiting for someone to suggest tracking down that stingray though....

Well the latest theory is that it was a Dingo with a snorkle
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Society Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group