Political Crossfire Forums

Airjorhe23 · Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 2

Call me sexist, I dont care, the truth is that in today's society, although women have a more active role, men will always overrule them. Imagine a female president in Russia, the US, France, and England. Although, they might be able to make good decisions, there is no denying their weaker presence. A man at the head issues more strenght for the nation he is governing over. if u disagree, please state why

lawguy · Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 15 Location: Kansas

Why bring this up, what are you looking for? Margaret Thatcher? What if Hillary Clinton wins?

micfranklin · Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:56 pm Post subject:

I'm very curious as to why this is being brought up.

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

Airjorhe23 wrote: Call me sexist, I dont care, the truth is that in today's society, although women have a more active role, men will always overrule them. Imagine a female president in Russia, the US, France, and England. Although, they might be able to make good decisions, there is no denying their weaker presence. A man at the head issues more strenght for the nation he is governing over. if u disagree, please state why

Roughly translated to, "HEY EVERYONE, LOOK AT ME!"

MplsBison · Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 3237

Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

Other than that, I don't really see that much of a difference. As long as she were competant, I would have no problem with a woman boss.

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

tman_ndsu08 wrote: Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

I think she would have something to say about that...

Quicksurf · Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 4675

LostSoul3412 wrote: tman_ndsu08 wrote: Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

I think she would have something to say about that...

Nothing to say. Just wanted to make sure everyone gets to see this picture. :lol:

Green · Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:28 pm Post subject: Re: Why?

lawguy wrote: Why bring this up, what are you looking for? Margaret Thatcher? What if Hillary Clinton wins?

Hillary might pull out of the race. Plus, Im not voting for her unless everybody else on the ballot is worse.

bob.appleyard · Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 7589 Location: Manchestar, innit

Airjorhe23 wrote: Call me sexist, I dont care, the truth is that in today's society, although women have a more active role, men will always overrule them. Imagine a female president in Russia, the US, France, and England.

What, like Margaret Thatcher? Though your asserting that patriarchy still exists is right on, sister.

Protostar · Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:25 pm Post subject:

LostSoul3412 wrote: tman_ndsu08 wrote: Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

I think she would have something to say about that...

Thats a woman? :lol:

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

Protostar wrote: Thats a woman? :lol:

I'm sure some part of her is... maybe. :lol:

Shady · Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 7413 Location: VA

Somebody got rejected at the club by a dyke last night methinks...

spearsy23 · Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 5597 Location: Fulton, Ks

hillary is much more imposing than dubbya

Babylon_Horuv · Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 2087

Protostar wrote: LostSoul3412 wrote: tman_ndsu08 wrote: Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

I think she would have something to say about that...

Thats a woman? :lol:

I think she's hot.

Demosthenes_ · Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:18 am Post subject:

While I agree that it is very unlikely for women to take serious positions of office, they should. Naturally, women are more caring and protective. They would do a better job of protecting the country and keeping us safe. Men still need to be in power because they have the ruthlessness needed to stay in power and keep order. Make it like a nice big family.

Pareve · Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 895

Demosthenes_ wrote: While I agree that it is very unlikely for women to take serious positions of office, they should. Naturally, women are more caring and protective.
No, they really aren't. It's a positive stereotype, but a stereotype nonetheless. On the whole women are just as vicious, cruel, and backstabbing as men are.

Quote: They would do a better job of protecting the country and keeping us safe. Men still need to be in power because they have the ruthlessness needed to stay in power and keep order. Make it like a nice big family.
Are any of your coworkers women? If so, your workplace must not be very competative. Women want power just as much as men do. Women are just as ruthless.

micfranklin · Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject:

LostSoul3412 wrote: tman_ndsu08 wrote: Women are physically weaker than men. I don't even think women would protest that.

I think she would have something to say about that...

Sad to say, for me, it looks very strange to see a woman that muscular.

Protostar · Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject:

Why is "she" even wearing a bra? "She" doesn't even have any breasts. :lol:

The Grandmaster · Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject:

Protostar wrote: Why is "she" even wearing a bra? "She" doesn't even have any breasts. :lol:

Apsolutely horrific.

Yes that's about a 1100, Protostar, possibly 1150 at best. About 300 points below the acceptability threshold.

Selfish_Meme · Joined: 31 Jan 2006 Posts: 726

usually before photo shoots body builders dehydrate and pump and flex for definition, she wouldn't look as pumped most of the time and probably have a bit more breast, she wouldn't be horrible.