Political Crossfire Forums

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7657

Varyag wrote: I've seen single posts on this forum be more intelligent and insightful than the thousands of some members, or do you think that post counts make you smarter?

:rotf:

Do you always respond to compliments like that?

Varyag · Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 397 Location: Melos

LostSoul3412 wrote: Varyag wrote: No the abortion forums are to debate the concept of abortion itself, not its implications for various political paradigms.

:rotf:

Whatever, have fun with your dogmatic "paradigms".

There's nothing dogmatic about them, they're simply definitions that things fulfil or do not.

Varyag · Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 397 Location: Melos

LostSoul3412 wrote: Varyag wrote: Becuase a statist government does not have to be authoritarian or totalitarian?

But if it is a constitutional government, then there would be no need to establish a new HQ, and you would find home in the Independent HQ.

Yeah no need for the Rep, Dem and Green HQ's too?

Varyag · Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 397 Location: Melos

LostSoul3412 wrote: Varyag wrote: I've seen single posts on this forum be more intelligent and insightful than the thousands of some members, or do you think that post counts make you smarter?

:rotf:

Do you always respond to compliments like that?

Only when they're thinly vieled insults :wink:

Norbert · Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 137 Location: Washigton State

OK, OK, I won't post any more "+1" posts! Jeez! One +1 and the whole thread goes off on a rabbit trail of personal attacks! And no more abortion, either! This thread is here for people who want a nationalist HQ!
:thrhj:

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7657

Norbert wrote: OK, OK, I won't post any more "+1" posts! Jeez!

It wasn't the fact that you agreed to it, it was what exactly you were agreeing to.

sully111 · Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 57

Revenant wrote: I would actually like to endorse the creation of a Fascist HQ. It would be dedicated to the fundamental understanding of what Fascism actually is, because it's definition is not so concrete. It would be a place where members could discuss their theories and beliefs about Fascism, whether certain nations employed Fascism, and failures and successes of Fascism in the past. It would harbor real political discussion of fascist theory instead of degenerating into "Fascism = Hitler" topics that frequent PCF.

There is a certain group of people on this board that don't fit into the other HQ's, yet may just fit into "The Fascist HQ". I want to give them the chance to discuss their beliefs without people mocking or insulting them.

This is about whether or not you "like" Fascist theory. Rather do you endorse a place for people to discuss their own political beliefs free from condescension and hatred.

Its because fascism really should be called, the ideas used to get into power ,as Mussolini the so called founder of fascism was originally a socialist he left the socialist party created the fasciast party who were far left didnt get enough votes because the socialist part rules the left then he slowly took the fasciast party to the right which gave him more votes, went against his original policy that he would never turn fasciasm into a political party as it was a movement and fasciasms only policies where to oppose what ever they were aggainst not say what they were for.

Varyag · Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 397 Location: Melos

Ok I think its agreed this statist/nationalist HQ has enough support, wheres the person with the power to make this happen?

Conservative Leader · Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 680

Agreed.

There should also be an Anarchist HQ. The Radical HQ is not definitive enough, as anarchists shouldn't be lumped in with socialists and communists.

agentkgb · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 2241 Location: US

Conservative Leader wrote: Agreed.

There should also be an Anarchist HQ. The Radical HQ is not definitive enough, as anarchists shouldn't be lumped in with socialists and communists.
There is an Anarchist HQ.

Conservative Leader · Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 680

agentkgb wrote: Conservative Leader wrote: Agreed.

There should also be an Anarchist HQ. The Radical HQ is not definitive enough, as anarchists shouldn't be lumped in with socialists and communists.
There is an Anarchist HQ.

Ah, my mistake. I overlooked the new edition.

agentkgb · Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Posts: 2241 Location: US

Conservative Leader wrote: agentkgb wrote: Conservative Leader wrote: Agreed.

There should also be an Anarchist HQ. The Radical HQ is not definitive enough, as anarchists shouldn't be lumped in with socialists and communists.
There is an Anarchist HQ.

Ah, my mistake. I overlooked the new edition.
No problem.

John Galt · Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 20656 Location: Minnesota

As fascism is a type of socialism, there is no need for this particular type of HQ. Furthermore, since very few people actually know what it is and generally associate it, wrongly, with the Holocaust among other things that were done in Germany after the Great War and before their defeat (which was from a similar yet distinct group of socialists, the National Socialist Party or Nazis) the only people it would attract would not be actual fascists (of which there are many in the world) but skinheads and other rubes.

Denied.