| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Comrade
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 11438
Location: Zagreb
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
superskippy wrote: Quote: because every Arab state, including India, voted against 181. It says alsot when every nation in the Middle East votes against it, no?
So the Arabs didnt get their way, whats your point?
apparently only arabs opinions matters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Pareve
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 893
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Comrade wrote: superskippy wrote: Quote: because every Arab state, including India, voted against 181. It says alsot when every nation in the Middle East votes against it, no?
So the Arabs didnt get their way, whats your point?
apparently only arabs opinions matters.
The majority vote that made Israel possible was made of invisible non-nations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
maalox
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Location: above u
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
i am against the nulear term
even the [peacefull nuclear power cz it`s poluting |
|
| Back to top |
|
Saracen
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 15548
Location: On Earth
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: because every Arab state, including India
:rotf: |
|
| Back to top |
|
maalox
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Location: above u
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| indians are not arabs |
|
| Back to top |
|
Pareve
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 893
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maalox wrote: indians are not arabs
Nor is India located in the Middle East. |
|
| Back to top |
|
battleax86
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 4997
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiction416 wrote: Pareve wrote:
Why should Israel care about these resolutions when the original resolution mandating for two separate states was completely ignored by the surrounding Arab nations and the Palestinians?
because every Arab state, including India, voted against 181. It says alsot when every nation in the Middle East votes against it, no?
God bless the ignorant among us. :rotf:
If I could still put quotes in my sig, that would be a sure winner. :lol: |
|
| Back to top |
|
fiction416
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 620
Location: purgatory
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^^ Ahh damn, I'm taking alot of heat for that one - what i meant to say is;
because every Arab state, even India...
but oh well, i never noticed this till now, flame away... |
|
| Back to top |
|
the sane voice
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2512
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i think this pole asks the wrong question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
augustus kafka
Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
quick question. who do you guys think cares more about MAD?
Israelis - people who say they're fighting for their survival anyways
Iran - comprised of a percentage of people who welcome martyrdom anyways
That said, neither should have nukes. F*** nukes. American ones, Israeli ones, Russian ones, Iranian ones, French ones, whatever. I don't care. Anything that gives you control of millions of people's lives is BAD. Restraint is a trait not every politician shares. Hunger for power is. A power-hungry politician without restraint as the leader of any one of these countries? BAD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
navyblue
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 55
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nukes are here to stay. We can't go backwards and pretend the technology doesn't exist, nor empty the arsenals of nuclear states and hope everyone plays well with one another. If building a nuclear weapon and a delivery system is within the scope of human ability, and it obviously is, nuclear weapons will exist. So, better democratized states that grasp the policies of containment and deterrence and MAD have them, than relinquish what will exist anyway and become asymmetrical tools of torn, cleft, and failed states that in the absence of parity would rush to acquire such a resource.
As for Israel having nukes, knowledge of that on the part of her enemies is probably what's kept her on the map. A bomb in the basement can be a good thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Shuya Nanahara
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 414
Location: london
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Impeacher wrote: Tono, you are a crafty bastidge.. ;)
I said no, reason is non-proliferation.
That said, I believe Israel has the most well known non-declared nuclear program in the world.
Unlike Iran, however:
Quote: Israel - Israel is not a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and refuses to officially confirm or deny having a nuclear arsenal, or to having developed nuclear weapons, or even to having a nuclear weapons program. Although Israel claims that the Negev Nuclear Research Center near Dimona is a "research reactor," no scientific reports based on work done there have ever been published. Extensive information about the program in Dimona was also disclosed by technician Mordechai Vanunu in 1986. Imagery analysts can identify weapon bunkers, mobile missile launchers, and launch sites in satellite photographs. It is believed to possess nuclear weapons by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel may have tested a nuclear weapon along with South Africa in 1979, but this has never been confirmed (see Vela Incident). According to the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists, they possess 75-200 weapons.[21]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons
That they denied that they have denied anything officially is probably very telling.
yeah i kinda thought they already had 'em too............krafty indeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
|
