Political Crossfire Forums

[lilwolf]

While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

[Lucky Luke]

lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D

[Onevote]

Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Lucky, could you at least read the damn article "BEFORE" passing judgment! It's quite telling about your own character when you do that.

[lilwolf]

Oh yes, LL I have read the article and I thin it is a good article that sheds a great deal of light on the effectiveness of thr RTC and RTI as well as the effectiveness of the Concealed weapons permits.
Kinda shoots some of your theories right in the foot.
So you can read it or you can set and wonder. You choice I do not care which way you go on it.
Dispute it all you wish.

[Onevote]

Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Another link! gun crime statistics. http://www.frontsight.com/promotion/11/american.htm

[Lucky Luke]

Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Another link! gun crime statistics. http://www.frontsight.com/promotion/11/american.htm

My dear fellow poster, had you follow my posts you would know that I am using this gun crime statistic regularly but unlike you I don't wait for a anti gun control internet site to tell me all about it, I read it straight from the source:


Funny enough I just quoted this stat in another thread where I put the use of a gun for self defence generously at 1%, your site decided to go for less 0.7% of all people choosing to defend themselves against a criminal making the number of American people using a gun against a criminal at around 2,500 a year.

:-D
:-D

[Lucky Luke]

lilwolf wrote: Oh yes, LL I have read the article and I thin it is a good article that sheds a great deal of light on the effectiveness of thr RTC and RTI as well as the effectiveness of the Concealed weapons permits.
Kinda shoots some of your theories right in the foot.
So you can read it or you can set and wonder. You choice I do not care which way you go on it.
Dispute it all you wish.

If you are not going to bother making a good argument about this link, why should I bother?
It is just another link, it proves nothing without a good argument or presentation.
I have not read it but I have no doubt that like the other links you posted, this one will end up biting you in the ass.
:-D
:-D

[Lucky Luke]

Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Lucky, could you at least read the damn article "BEFORE" passing judgment! It's quite telling about your own character when you do that.

I just caught Lilwolf not reading one of my posts addressed to him, why should I bother keeping reading his links when he doesn't bother reading my posts? He would not post most of the links he posts if he read them first.

:-D
:-D

[Onevote]

Lucky Luke wrote: Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Another link! gun crime statistics. http://www.frontsight.com/promotion/11/american.htm

My dear fellow poster, had you follow my posts you would know that I am using this gun crime statistic regularly but unlike you I don't wait for a anti gun control internet site to tell me all about it, I read it straight from the source:


Funny enough I just quoted this stat in another thread where I put the use of a gun for self defence generously at 1%, your site decided to go for less 0.7% of all people choosing to defend themselves against a criminal making the number of American people using a gun against a criminal at around 2,500 a year.

:-D
:-D The figures originate from the Department of Justice!

You must "READ" the article to understand the content. Give it a try.

[lilwolf]

He is afraid of it. Got no balls .... :lol: :lol:

[Onevote]

Lucky Luke wrote: Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Lucky, could you at least read the damn article "BEFORE" passing judgment! It's quite telling about your own character when you do that.

I just caught Lilwolf not reading one of my posts addressed to him, why should I bother keeping reading his links when he doesn't bother reading my posts? He would not post most of the links he posts if he read them first.

:-D
:-D Simple really, if you don't read the content of the link, you can't have an informed opinion! Thereby making any opinion you have an emotional one...............And we don't want that!

[Lucky Luke]

Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: Onevote wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: lilwolf wrote: While some will say this useless propaganda it does have some very good statistics and data. It is indeed a very informative read any way you put it, or choose to read it.
www.largo.org/Lott.html

More stats and more numbers from Lilwolf, who could have guessed?

Before I start, have you read the link and made your mind up or are you just posting the link because you liked the catchy title?

I need to know if you are backing Lott 100% Lilwolf.
:-D
:-D Lucky, could you at least read the damn article "BEFORE" passing judgment! It's quite telling about your own character when you do that.

I just caught Lilwolf not reading one of my posts addressed to him, why should I bother keeping reading his links when he doesn't bother reading my posts? He would not post most of the links he posts if he read them first.

:-D
:-D Simple really, if you don't read the content of the link, you can't have an informed opinion! Thereby making any opinion you have an emotional one...............And we don't want that!

I can't see anybody very interested by it so far, your one in the other hand was very interesting.

:-D
:-D

[lilwolf]

Come on LL, just read the article and offer an opinion. It does not have to be an long drawn out turd fight. Just offer an opinion.... :)