Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

Marketism
Click here to go to the original topic

 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Philosophy Forum
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:59 pm    Post subject: Marketism  

It has become clear to me that the only real problem anyone has with my political beliefs is the pesky word "anarchy." So I'm dropping it. From now on I'm a marketist. I believe in a free market in the absence of any monopoly on force. People can form voluntary organizations if they want. Some people call those governments, so guess what? Guess I'm not an anarchist! From now on call me a marketist.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 7657

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:54 pm    Post subject:  

Why are you changing the title of your ideals to fit the conformity of others expectations?

I'm an Anarcho-Capitalist that has to defend "Anarcho" almost everyday; doesn't mean I give in.
Back to top  
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:34 pm    Post subject:  

LostSoul3412 wrote: Why are you changing the title of your ideals to fit the conformity of others expectations?

I'm an Anarcho-Capitalist that has to defend "Anarcho" almost everyday; doesn't mean I give in.

Why bother? The only difference in you and me is that if people agree with me, they'll admit it.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 7657

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:38 pm    Post subject:  

Dr. Wojtyla wrote: Why bother?

Because you shouldn't compromise your ideals to fit what other people want. Anarcho-Capitalism is still a form of Anarchy, and that's not going to change. Giving in to pressure only proves that the pressure was rightly applied. Giving up should never be an option in philosophy.

Dr. Wojtyla wrote: The only difference in you and me is that if people agree with me, they'll admit it.

There are many Anarcho-Capitalists that openly agree with me. foadi, Anarcho-Kapitalizt, Cyro, gavnook, just to name a few... you'd be suprised how many of us there are.
Back to top  
FinnMacCool



Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 2731

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:47 am    Post subject: Re: Marketism  

Dr. Wojtyla wrote: It has become clear to me that the only real problem anyone has with my political beliefs is the pesky word "anarchy." So I'm dropping it. From now on I'm a marketist. I believe in a free market in the absence of any monopoly on force. People can form voluntary organizations if they want. Some people call those governments, so guess what? Guess I'm not an anarchist! From now on call me a marketist.

Good idea! From now on, thats what I'm reffering to all capitlaists.

Its still redundant because anarchism does use markets and there are socialist free markets but at least we have Anarcho out of the name.
Back to top  
FinnMacCool



Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 2731

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:49 am    Post subject:  

Quote: Because you shouldn't compromise your ideals to fit what other people want. Anarcho-Capitalism is still a form of Anarchy, and that's not going to change.
Wrong.

Considering the fact that traditional allies of anarchists have always been communists, socialists, and social democrats, it is absurd to think that marketists would be, in any way shape or form, a branch of anarchism. It only reinforces your ignorance.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 7657

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:16 am    Post subject: Re: Marketism  

FinnMacCool wrote: Dr. Wojtyla wrote: It has become clear to me that the only real problem anyone has with my political beliefs is the pesky word "anarchy." So I'm dropping it. From now on I'm a marketist. I believe in a free market in the absence of any monopoly on force. People can form voluntary organizations if they want. Some people call those governments, so guess what? Guess I'm not an anarchist! From now on call me a marketist.

Good idea! From now on, thats what I'm reffering to all capitlaists.

Its still redundant because anarchism does use markets and there are socialist free markets but at least we have Anarcho out of the name.

See what I mean? Giving up means giving in.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 7657

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:16 am    Post subject:  

FinnMacCool wrote: Quote: Because you shouldn't compromise your ideals to fit what other people want. Anarcho-Capitalism is still a form of Anarchy, and that's not going to change.
Wrong.

Considering the fact that traditional allies of anarchists have always been communists, socialists, and social democrats, it is absurd to think that marketists would be, in any way shape or form, a branch of anarchism. It only reinforces your ignorance.

Yes, because if it came first, it can never change. :roll:
Back to top  
FinnMacCool



Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 2731

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:24 am    Post subject:  

Considering the fact that traditional allies of anarchists have always been communists, socialists, and social democrats, it is absurd to think that marketists would be, in any way shape or form, a branch of anarchism. It only reinforces your ignorance.[/quote]

Quote: Yes, because if it came first, it can never change. :roll:

Thats not even the point. We don't have anything in common. The very idea of "Anarcho-Capitalism" being a branch of anarchism is just stupid and shows a lack of understanding of anarchist ideology.
Back to top  
David Kelly



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 451
Location: Kissimmee, FL

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:48 pm    Post subject:  

Anarchy = A total waist of time, hance the fact that communism has never taken root. Just give up on it already!
As for Anarco-Capitalist, :lol:
Back to top  
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:56 pm    Post subject:  

LostSoul3412 wrote: Dr. Wojtyla wrote: Why bother?

Because you shouldn't compromise your ideals to fit what other people want. Anarcho-Capitalism is still a form of Anarchy, and that's not going to change. Giving in to pressure only proves that the pressure was rightly applied. Giving up should never be an option in philosophy.


I have no ideals regarding labels and you're a fool if you do. But hey, good to know you'd give it all up if people spelled your name wrong.
Quote:

Dr. Wojtyla wrote: The only difference in you and me is that if people agree with me, they'll admit it.

There are many Anarcho-Capitalists that openly agree with me. foadi, Anarcho-Kapitalizt, Cyro, gavnook, just to name a few... you'd be suprised how many of us there are.

I know most of them from Anti-state.com.
Back to top  
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:00 pm    Post subject:  

David Kelly wrote: Anarchy = A total waist of time, hance the fact that communism has never taken root. Just give up on it already!
As for Anarco-Capitalist, :lol:

Whether I "give up" on anarcho-capitalism has little bearing on the fact that the private sector gets stronger than the public sector every day.
Back to top  
FinnMacCool



Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 2731

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject:  

David Kelly wrote: Anarchy = A total waist of time, hance the fact that communism has never taken root. Just give up on it already!
As for Anarco-Capitalist, :lol:

Anarchism has a better track record then marketism.

And you guys have Somalia so thats negative 2 points.
Back to top  
LostSoul3412



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 7657

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:11 am    Post subject:  

FinnMacCool wrote: And you guys have Somalia so thats negative 2 points.

:roll:

Even you know that Somalia is anything but Anarchist.
Back to top  
Anarko-Kapitalizt



Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 2517

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 am    Post subject:  

Meh, I'm either going to start calling myself a red-headed step child libertarian or an exploiter of pandas.
Back to top  
Robin Hood



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3295

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:47 am    Post subject:  

Well I'm a Market Anarchist, the AnSocs who deny this are usually the functionally illiterate ones. In other words the anarchists who reckon anarchy simply means chaos and a license to kill anyone you don't like - normally those who bullied them you at school.
Back to top  
Roman



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 180

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Marketism  

Dr. Wojtyla wrote: It has become clear to me that the only real problem anyone has with my political beliefs is the pesky word "anarchy." So I'm dropping it. From now on I'm a marketist. I believe in a free market in the absence of any monopoly on force. People can form voluntary organizations if they want. Some people call those governments, so guess what? Guess I'm not an anarchist! From now on call me a marketist.

You sound more like a die-hard Libertarian.
Back to top  
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Marketism  

Roman wrote: Dr. Wojtyla wrote: It has become clear to me that the only real problem anyone has with my political beliefs is the pesky word "anarchy." So I'm dropping it. From now on I'm a marketist. I believe in a free market in the absence of any monopoly on force. People can form voluntary organizations if they want. Some people call those governments, so guess what? Guess I'm not an anarchist! From now on call me a marketist.

You sound more like a die-hard Libertarian.

Market anarchists are the most die-hard Libertarians of all.
Back to top  
Dr. Wojtyla



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 2527
Location: Watican City

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:22 pm    Post subject:  

FinnMacCool wrote: David Kelly wrote: Anarchy = A total waist of time, hance the fact that communism has never taken root. Just give up on it already!
As for Anarco-Capitalist, :lol:

Anarchism has a better track record then marketism.

And you guys have Somalia so thats negative 2 points.

Every time you do something you weren't forced to do, that's another point for marketism. Every time you and another person cooperate to do something voluntarily, that's another point. Every time you're forced to do something, or prevented through force from doing something, that's a point against. Since the number of things the average person does voluntarily (the private sector) has grown relative to the number of things the average person does or doesn't do as a result of coercion (the public sector), the world has grown and will probably continue to grow more market anarchist.
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Philosophy Forum
Page 1 of 1

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group