Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

should Australia have a "bill of rights" in the Co
Click here to go to the original topic

 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Australia
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jOcelyN



Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 4

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:05 am    Post subject: should Australia have a "bill of rights" in the Co  

hi my name is Jocelyn Lim from Malaysia....

i would like to know that do you think that A "bill of rights" is needed in the Australian Constitution?

would it better protect the needs and rights as well as the freedoms of the citizens of Australia ?????


thanks

:!oops: :!oops:
Back to top  
adleberg



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 164

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:42 am    Post subject:  

last year I would have said a definite NO

now however with the way the govt is stripping away legal basic rights of all australians with the media turning a convenient blind eye I would say as soon as possible!
Back to top  
jOcelyN



Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 4

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:47 am    Post subject: BILL OF RIGHTS  

Y WOULD U SAY THAT??

WAT RIGHTS ARE BEING STRIPPED BY THE GOVT??
Back to top  
adleberg



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 164

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:48 am    Post subject:  

Like many western nations, Australia has jumped right on the anti-terror legislation band wagon. The updated terror laws recently passed, without so much as a passing mention in the media, undermine basic human rights such as any sense of a fair trial and the basic assumption of innocent until proven guilty. I didnt beleive it was so bad until the recent example of the first man to be charged under the laws - Faheem Khalid Lodhi. How can you defend yourself if you can't see the evidence? How can a jury decide if IT cant see the evidence?

It makes a mockery of the court system and relegates it to a formality.

Yes this is a quote from the court trasncript:
Prosecutor: I can't show you the evidence, but let me assure you it's compelling.

The sad truth is that nobody will say anything until the accused has a name like Smith.

Dateline SBS did a report on the laws, its very troubling.
http://news.sbs.com.au/dateline/index.php?page=transcript&dte=2006-06-28&headlineid=1140

This is the bill itself. The changes effectively mean that terrorism comes down to interpretation of the individual, not the evidence.
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/Bills1.nsf/framelodgmentattachments/014E79211AB67AE5CA2570AE0009852C

People of other countries take note - this is not an isolated incident
Back to top  
Muzz



Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:05 pm    Post subject:  

Jihad Jack Thomas is Anglo-Celtic in background. He was recently freed on appeal. Perhaps all i's and t's were not dotted and crossed.
Back to top  
Ch33kY



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 1281

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:40 am    Post subject:  

If these are supposedly Australian values, then we should have a Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Australia
Page 1 of 1

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group