Political Crossfire Forums

[Bull]

These are some entertaining interviews of 9/11 Truth people on FOX news...the first one is with Kevin Barrett and he pretty much exposes Hannity for the person he is. The second is better though, and from the same show too.

Kevin Barrett

Spin Attack Gone Wrong - Go to the middle of the page.

[Robodoon]

Bull wrote: These are some entertaining interviews of 9/11 Truth people on FOX news...the first one is with Kevin Barrett and he pretty much exposes Hannity for the person he is. The second is better though, and from the same show too.

Kevin Barrett

Spin Attack Gone Wrong - Go to the middle of the page.

Wasn't it amazing that the "Fair and Balanced" Hannity and combs both attacked him. (Kevin)

GOLLY where is the "balance"

The poor guy was so nervous, but he gave it to them pretty good.

When he said "fox shouldn't be on the Air" and that government line is the "conspiracy theory (which it is) it was over.

[Bull]

Robodoon wrote: Bull wrote: These are some entertaining interviews of 9/11 Truth people on FOX news...the first one is with Kevin Barrett and he pretty much exposes Hannity for the person he is. The second is better though, and from the same show too.

Kevin Barrett

Spin Attack Gone Wrong - Go to the middle of the page.

Wasn't it amazing that the "Fair and Balanced" Hannity and combs both attacked him. (Kevin)

GOLLY where is the "balance"

The poor guy was so nervous, but he gave it to them pretty good.

When he said "fox shouldn't be on the Air" and that government line is the "conspiracy theory (which it is) it was over.

He didn't look all that nervous to me. I thought he held his own under Hannity's "venom." :lol:

[Robodoon]

Bull wrote: Robodoon wrote: Bull wrote: These are some entertaining interviews of 9/11 Truth people on FOX news...the first one is with Kevin Barrett and he pretty much exposes Hannity for the person he is. The second is better though, and from the same show too.

Kevin Barrett

Spin Attack Gone Wrong - Go to the middle of the page.

Wasn't it amazing that the "Fair and Balanced" Hannity and combs both attacked him. (Kevin)

GOLLY where is the "balance"

The poor guy was so nervous, but he gave it to them pretty good.

When he said "fox shouldn't be on the Air" and that government line is the "conspiracy theory (which it is) it was over.

He didn't look all that nervous to me. I thought he held his own under Hannity's "venom." :lol:

How enjoyable would it be for either of us to get Hannity or Combs in a room where their isn't a cut off button. :-D OH THE FUN!...oh the wiggling that would go on :lol:

[SouthernBelle82]

Robodoon wrote: Bull wrote: These are some entertaining interviews of 9/11 Truth people on FOX news...the first one is with Kevin Barrett and he pretty much exposes Hannity for the person he is. The second is better though, and from the same show too.

Kevin Barrett

Spin Attack Gone Wrong - Go to the middle of the page.

Wasn't it amazing that the "Fair and Balanced" Hannity and combs both attacked him. (Kevin)

GOLLY where is the "balance"

The poor guy was so nervous, but he gave it to them pretty good.

When he said "fox shouldn't be on the Air" and that government line is the "conspiracy theory (which it is) it was over.

Hannity ignored what the guy said about his classroom and education and tried his best to belittle the guy as a teacher. The guy said that he showed all view points and Hannity totally, of course, ignored that and attacked the guy. And anybody who watches faux and thinks they are fair and balanced is out of their freakin mind. Colmes is just like the rest of them. And what's interesting watching "Hannity & Colmes" is Hannity does majority of the talking and Colmes barley says anything and is even told "shut up" by "guests" on the show. :roll: I thought the teacher did pretty well though and he knew the show and was prepared to defend himself. He wasn't shouting or anything like that but was very calm and secure in himself. Good job to him. I loved how Alan asked both teachers if the courses were "required." I love Alan said "how do you know they knew?" and it's like they all forgot the "testimony" Condi Rice did for the whitewash 9/11 Commission where she said they got the memo "BinLadin Determined to Strike Inside the United States" and they all sat on their butts and ignored Richard Clarke and the Clinton/Gore administration. The second guy did a lot better then the first one though I think. On edit the second guy had a bit better conversation and I do admit that Ollie and Alan treated him with a bit more respect then Hannity and the first teacher.

[psholtz]

I love that ending..

We Watch Fox News, So You Don't Have To

:lol:

[SouthernBelle82]

psholtz wrote: I love that ending..

We Watch Fox News, So You Don't Have To

:lol:

LOL. That's what the Stephanie Miller show says. She's a liberal talk show host based in Los Angeles (her father was the VP mate of Barry Goldwater) and she says that too. :grin:

[psholtz]

If I was in an "interview" w/ Oliver North, I would totally turn the interview on him and begin questioning him on Iran-Contra..

Iran-Contra was perhaps the biggest financial crime ever committed in U.S. history, and North was a key player (as was Porter Goss). Never had to serve a day in prison for it either.. In fact, seems they gave him his own Fox News show as a result.

Read The Conspirators by Al Martin. All kinds of good info that can be used against North in a tete-a-tete like this one.. :tu:

[paulmarkj]

Barrett has an opinion but cannot argue his position. He, like so many conspiracy theorists, keeps telling us that he uses his 'open' mind and he teaches his students to do the same, but of course, like so many conspiracy theorists, he has a closed mind. He confuses people disagreeing with him as being closed minds.

As for exposing "Hannity for the person he is", I didn't see that. Tell me what part of the interview you think that happened. All I can see is Barrett struggling to put up an argument. I don't know who Barrett is, but he was exposed for the person he is: first, he admits he is a satirist and an activist – so clearly he has a biased view, second he is teaching a class that gives his point of view and is unwilling to be challenged. Again, like so many conspiracy theorists, when his views are challenged all he can argue is that the rest of us don’t understand.

I don’t mind if he has a point of view, but teaching a class MUST be balanced. He will be training his students to do nothing more that believe in what ever any nut says. As is evidenced on these discussion boards, the arguments are very far from clear cut.

[truthiness760]

I agree that he could not agrue his position...mainy because Hannity kept talking over him. He's almost as bad as O'reilly!!

Quote: As for exposing "Hannity for the person he is", I didn't see that. Tell me what part of the interview you think that happened.
Hannity - "Yeah the evidence is overwhelming to you because you are a conspiracy nut." Way to compose yourself Hannity! Very professional. He comes into the interview with an attitude and name-calls at the first opportunity he gets...very "fair and balanced".

Quote: I don’t mind if he has a point of view, but teaching a class MUST be balanced.
Kevin Barrett - "Im interested in training people how to use critical thinking skills to look at the evidence, in any area, and come to their own conclusions." Hmmm...sounds balanced to me! Analyzing evidence...coming to own conclusions...I think the whole fox team should take his course...haha.

[Bull]

Bill O'Reilly Death Threat Against Kevin Barrett

Well, Faux News is at it again...with their Goebbels attacks.