Political Crossfire Forums

George W Bush · Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:52 pm Post subject: Someone opposed to gays

Look at this persons car. They must either be skitsophrenic or extremely homophobic because their proposal is threatening:

Note the homestate: Colorado - state for Marilyn Musgrave (Federal Marriage Amendmant writer)

Valdimar · Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 711 Location: San Francisco

I'd like to see how long he'd last driving that POS through my city. :lol: It's not pretty when you piss off a group of gays and lesbians.

Kt · Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 3806

I belive homosexal shud kill him...

John Galt · Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 20672 Location: Minnesota

Man for Women

Women for Man

Ahem.

So does he also believe in polygamy?

SaintLucifer · Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 79

George W Bush wrote: Look at this persons car. They must either be skitsophrenic or extremely homophobic because their proposal is threatening:

Note the homestate: Colorado - state for Marilyn Musgrave (Federal Marriage Amendmant writer)

The owner of that truck has balls. I applaud him. Homosexuality should be outlawed immediately and given that I am a fascist it is hoped that I may gain power within my country one day to 'strip' *ROTFLMAO* all homosexuals of their 'rights'. I would never tolerate such deviant behaviour. Before you all think I am a Bible-thumper, on the contrary. I seek to destroy religion also.

SaintLucifer · Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 79

John Galt wrote: Man for Women

Women for Man

Ahem.

So does he also believe in polygamy?

I saw the error but I would most certainly accept polygamy over homosexuality any day. Polygamy is not a sexual deviation. Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.

Melchior · Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 9284 Location: Palm Beach

Homosexals?

Well it looks like homosexuals have nothing to worry about from this guy.

Enoch · Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 8567

SaintLucifer wrote: John Galt wrote: Man for Women

Women for Man

Ahem.

So does he also believe in polygamy?

I saw the error but I would most certainly accept polygamy over homosexuality any day. Polygamy is not a sexual deviation. Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.
Funny, that WE should be kept out of the gene pool. Here's a news flash: Gay people don't make gay children. Straight people do. Ask any gay man or lesbian, and odds are they had straight parents. ;-)

Maybe people with close-minded attitudes should be kept out of the gene pool instead.

George W Bush · Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:46 am Post subject:

SaintLucifer wrote: John Galt wrote: Man for Women

Women for Man

Ahem.

So does he also believe in polygamy?

I saw the error but I would most certainly accept polygamy over homosexuality any day. Polygamy is not a sexual deviation. Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.

Well, you can thank the APA for declassifying Homosexuality as a psychological disorder.

Rightfully so. Many are comfortable enough with their "disorder" for it not to affect how they feel about themselves.

The problems occur when they have not accepted themselves for whatever reason - and want to change. Reparative therapy can work for someone determined enough.

But, I dont think legislating sexuality is humane. Its fascist. Were free to be who we want and people such as yourself have no right demanding another person be who they want. In other words, anothers sexuality has nothing to do with you.

F'losrix · Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:21 am Post subject:

SaintLucifer wrote: Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA.
Well, such 'common knowledge' sometimes proves to be wrong. There is no scientific proof that homoesxuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. There's certainly research that hints at something creating a biological predisposition, but we don't know whether that something is genetic, hormones released by the mother into the baby's bloodstream while the two remain connected during the birthing process, a combination of the two, or due to something completely different.

SaintLucifer wrote: In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.[/color]
I suppose you also subscribe to the antiquated notion that Jews are really the product of a polluted genetic heritage and should be exterminated along with anyone else you deem 'defective' or dangerous to society?

Anyone who thinks that the sentiments of the Nazis aren't alive and gaining ground needs to read the posts of SaintLucifer, a self-proclaimed fascist. The stuff he's talking about is exactly the kind of thinking the Nazis promoted as their eugenics programs developed and morphed into a philosophy that resulted in the extermination of thousands if not millions of innocent people.

politikill · Joined: 26 May 2006 Posts: 13 Location: Toronto

UrielsFyre wrote: SaintLucifer wrote: John Galt wrote: Man for Women

Women for Man

Ahem.

So does he also believe in polygamy?

I saw the error but I would most certainly accept polygamy over homosexuality any day. Polygamy is not a sexual deviation. Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.
Funny, that WE should be kept out of the gene pool. Here's a news flash: Gay people don't make gay children. Straight people do. Ask any gay man or lesbian, and odds are they had straight parents. ;-)

Maybe people with close-minded attitudes should be kept out of the gene pool instead.

Amen

Gay people dont make any kind of children. Tis the nature of homosexuality

Valdimar · Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 711 Location: San Francisco

politikill wrote: Amen

Gay people dont make any kind of children. Tis the nature of homosexuality
A gay man is perfectly capable of impregnating a female. That is just as plausible as a lesbian being impregnated by a male. Each only takes but 5 minutes.

Valdimar · Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 711 Location: San Francisco

SaintLucifer wrote: I saw the error but I would most certainly accept polygamy over homosexuality any day. Polygamy is not a sexual deviation. Homosexuality is. Everyone knows homosexuality is the result of screwed-up DNA. In other words, those who are homosexual have 'damaged' DNA and should be kept out of the gene pool. Homosexuality is a completely unnatural act and should be treated as such with tough laws that are to be enforced via the mailed fist.
Ecstatically, people with your way of thinking are slowly dying off in this world.

toddytodd · Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 2736

George W Bush wrote: Look at this persons car. They must either be skitsophrenic or extremely homophobic because their proposal is threatening:

Note the homestate: Colorado - state for Marilyn Musgrave (Federal Marriage Amendmant writer)

They give tickets for 'obscene' bumper stickers, but this is allowed? Crazy - nothing but crazy

George W Bush · Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject:

as you can see, license plate numbers are visible. :twisted:

if anyone wants to pursue this, they could say they have photographs of a threat.

dont know if it will work. but, who knows.

A Promise Kept · Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 93

I am a straight male. I don't think i'll ever be gay..ever. I personally think that gayness is not natural, however, before all the gay people come after me, I will say that as long as you aren't being gay in public or trying to convert someone its fine. And if you want to get married, do you have to call it marriage? Marriage is between a man and a woman, but if you call gay marriage, garriage, then there won't be any confusion. Like when someone says they are getting married, the person usually asks, who's the bride (if its a male) or who's the groom (if its a female) but then it would get complicated if gays were also allowed to get married and not garried. So just call it garriage. Also another thing to ponder is I've heard some controversy about gay history being put into the history books. I feel that it has no place in a textbook that children are forced to read.

I know this is alittle off topic...but. I am in Boy Scouts, and we all know that the BSA ( and i think girl scouts too) does not allow gay people in its organization. Do you think they should be allowed to do that? I think they should because its for safety reasons.

About this picture, hmm... the ACLU is gonna have a tough time with that one. Do they defend free speech or fight discrimination?
Just remember, I think gay people are different but i happen to know a great many gay/bi people so I am not closeminded. I'm not gayaphobic.

sparsely · Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 1790

A friend of mine in Arkansas called me today and told me about a guy driving around town with "f**s will burn in Hell" or something
painted on the window his truck.
He asked me what I thought he should've done.
As far as the funniest response, I think it would've been to set his truck on fire :-D

islandhopper · Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 364 Location: 10,000 Islands

A Promise Kept wrote: I am a straight male. I don't think i'll ever be gay..ever. I personally think that gayness is not natural, however, before all the gay people come after me, I will say that as long as you aren't being gay in public or trying to convert someone its fine. .

Um, sorry, but I'm gay and I go out in public; therefore I am a gay person in public. Sorry, can't help it.
Convert? How does that happen anyway? Explain how I can convert someone's sexuality?

A Promise Kept wrote: And if you want to get married, do you have to call it marriage? Marriage is between a man and a woman, but if you call gay marriage, garriage, then there won't be any confusion. Like when someone says they are getting married, the person usually asks, who's the bride (if its a male) or who's the groom (if its a female) but then it would get complicated if gays were also allowed to get married and not garried. So just call it garriage. Also another thing to ponder is I've heard some controversy about gay history being put into the history books. I feel that it has no place in a textbook that children are forced to read.

OK, garriage? Fine, if it keeps your feeble brain from getting confused. As for gay history; not sure what the controversy is there so I can't comment (I mean, I really haven't heard about it).

A Promise Kept wrote: I know this is alittle off topic...but. I am in Boy Scouts, and we all know that the BSA ( and i think girl scouts too) does not allow gay people in its organization. Do you think they should be allowed to do that? I think they should because its for safety reasons..

Safety reasons? And what exactly is unsafe about a gay scout leader? And don't give me that sexual predator crap either. We all know that heterosexuals have their share of pedophiles.

sparsely · Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 1790

A Promise Kept wrote: I am a straight male. I don't think i'll ever be gay..ever. I personally think that gayness is not natural, however, before all the gay people come after me, I will say that as long as you aren't being gay in public or trying to convert someone its fine. And if you want to get married, do you have to call it marriage? Marriage is between a man and a woman, but if you call gay marriage, garriage, then there won't be any confusion. Like when someone says they are getting married, the person usually asks, who's the bride (if its a male) or who's the groom (if its a female) but then it would get complicated if gays were also allowed to get married and not garried. So just call it garriage. Also another thing to ponder is I've heard some controversy about gay history being put into the history books. I feel that it has no place in a textbook that children are forced to read.

I know this is alittle off topic...but. I am in Boy Scouts, and we all know that the BSA ( and i think girl scouts too) does not allow gay people in its organization. Do you think they should be allowed to do that? I think they should because its for safety reasons.

About this picture, hmm... the ACLU is gonna have a tough time with that one. Do they defend free speech or fight discrimination?
Just remember, I think gay people are different but i happen to know a great many gay/bi people so I am not closeminded. I'm not gayaphobic.

:lol: you're funny.
are you cute, too? ;-)

Enoch · Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 8567

A Promise Kept wrote: I am a straight male. I don't think i'll ever be gay..ever. I personally think that gayness is not natural, however, before all the gay people come after me, I will say that as long as you aren't being gay in public or trying to convert someone its fine.
I won't be gay in public if you aren't straight in public. Deal?

A Promise Kept wrote: And if you want to get married, do you have to call it marriage?
Yes. Because, whether you want to call it that, or if the law wants to call it that, I will. Legally if they are called "Same-Sex Legal Unions," I will still call it marriage, tell people I am married, and invite people to my wedding.

A Promise Kept wrote: I know this is alittle off topic...but. I am in Boy Scouts, and we all know that the BSA ( and i think girl scouts too) does not allow gay people in its organization. Do you think they should be allowed to do that? I think they should because its for safety reasons.
I think your "safety reasons" excuse is complete BS. But, either way, I do support the BSA on this one. As a private organization they should have the right to determine who they will or will not allow in.