Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

Israeli - Palestinian Conflict (a resolution)
Click here to go to the original topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Middle East Politics
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
locke862



Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 84

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 8:16 pm    Post subject: Israeli - Palestinian Conflict (a resolution)  

This area is primarily for discussing resolutions to the Palestinian-Israeli conflicts.

Israel should relocate all Israelis in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Then, place a Mine Field around the border and have a few checkpoints on roads to get through, (tight security there). The only dilemma is that the Israelis would not want to leave and this could cause a civil war.
Back to top  
theshield



Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 350

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:49 pm    Post subject:  

Here is another idea:

We will dig a hole in the ground until Israel's land will be detached from the ME.We will become an island.

Once this happens we will start floating in the ocean until we find a bit friendlier neighborhood (we will make sure we won't end up too close to Europe, we know where that may lead us).

Before we leave , we will kiss our lovely cousins goodbye, take some photos for old time sake.Make sure we have enough Humus and falafel for the trip and be on our way.

How is that?
Back to top  
Secondary Oak



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 3418
Location: Haifa

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:21 am    Post subject: Re: Israeli - Palestinian Conflict (a resolution)  

locke862 wrote: This area is primarily for discussing resolutions to the Palestinian-Israeli conflicts.

Israel should relocate all Israelis in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Then, place a Mine Field around the border and have a few checkpoints on roads to get through, (tight security there). The only dilemma is that the Israelis would not want to leave and this could cause a civil war.
What you crudely outline is more or less the path Israel has chosen to take.
Back to top  
nrhy



Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 697
Location: Spain

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:25 am    Post subject:  

theshield wrote: Here is another idea:

We will dig a hole in the ground until Israel's land will be detached from the ME.We will become an island.

Once this happens we will start floating in the ocean until we find a bit friendlier neighborhood (we will make sure we won't end up too close to Europe, we know where that may lead us).

Before we leave , we will kiss our lovely cousins goodbye, take some photos for old time sake.Make sure we have enough Humus and falafel for the trip and be on our way.

How is that?

how about...dumping israelis on an island (madagascar?), rather than breaking of the levante.
Back to top  
Kane



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 12677
Location: Bay Area, CA

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:09 am    Post subject:  

Just give everybody a doughnut.
Back to top  
theshield



Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 350

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:39 am    Post subject:  

nrhy wrote: how about...dumping israelis on an island (madagascar?), rather than breaking of the levante.

I think you have tried that few times (dumping Israelis and all that...) , can't really say you were that successful.

But the fact that this time you offer an island rather than throwing the Jews to the sea is a progress.

You know what cousin, if i were in your shoes i wouldn't like to see us gone

.After we will be gone who else can you blame for you pathetic life? the scapegoat has gone.
Back to top  
Duchifas



Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 9950

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 6:52 am    Post subject:  

theshield wrote: nrhy wrote: how about...dumping israelis on an island (madagascar?), rather than breaking of the levante.

I think you have tried that few times (dumping Israelis and all that...) , can't really say you were that successful.

But the fact that this time you offer an island rather than throwing the Jews to the sea is a progress.

You know what cousin, if i were in your shoes i wouldn't like to see us gone

.After we will be gone who else can you blame for you pathetic life? the scapegoat has gone.

I don't think Arabs will have a hard time finding another scapegoat. After all, blame shifting seems to be their national sport. It will take a day or two, but I am sure they will manage. :)
Back to top  
mr_happy



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 319

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:34 pm    Post subject:  

well first Islamic Jihad needs to stop blowing things up and calling for Jewish blood

Then Israel can give back all the land seized in 1967 in exchange for sole control of Jerusalem

Seems good to me.
Back to top  
ToonArmyIsComing



Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 5888
Location: Ontario

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 1:59 am    Post subject:  

The best solution [while not realistic] is to require that everyone in the region renounce their religions and start using the brain to better the lives of everyone in the region and respect other people's freedoms. All sites of worship such as the Dome of Rock, Mecca, various Churches, mosques, synagogues, etc should be transformed into either tourist resorts or centres of education in how to be tolerant and respect other people's freedoms.

Alternatively, a good old fashioned genocide to wipe out the entire population in the whole region could solve the problem forever after which the area would be completely empty and peaceful.

theshield wrote: .After we will be gone who else can you blame for you pathetic life? the scapegoat has gone.

Er ... you must have a really short memory. This region has been a site of conflict for 1000s of years before "you" [I am using you to distinguish the Jews who came from Europe and Africa] arrived here and scapegoats have been plenty. These days, the Jewish state is the best form of scapegoat as it is in the News all the time.
Back to top  
Gnostic



Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 5382
Location: An asylum near you!

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 1:41 am    Post subject:  

mr_happy wrote: well first Islamic Jihad needs to stop blowing things up and calling for Jewish blood

Then Israel can give back all the land seized in 1967 in exchange for sole control of Jerusalem

Seems good to me.

I've as of late actually stopped paying attention to it. Since Hamas and Fatah now look like they want to play civil war with each other, I almost view the situation as nearly hopeless.

I'm not completely blaming the in-fighting on the Pals in general....the same thing has happened in countless territories and nations who found themselves annexed or colonized and ruled by brute military force by a foreign power just to be left without any semblance of adequate internal constitutionality left. Same thing is happening in Iraq.

But the time has come IMO for the Pals to unite and get their act together, and the gunfire in the streets Pal on Pal is only going to lose or erode world support for the Palestinian people as a whole and the goal of soveriegnty.
Back to top  
LandOfHypocrisy



Joined: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 539

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:55 am    Post subject:  

How about American Entrapreneurs come in and build a whole bunch of Chuck E. Cheeses. ....Regardless of political affiliation, everyone there seems to be having a lot of kids.
Back to top  
Kane



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 12677
Location: Bay Area, CA

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:42 am    Post subject:  

Well, I don't think either party at this time is able or willing to solve this situation...so let's do it. Send in a UN/EU/US peace keeping force along the Pre-1967 Borders and then lets see what happens...
Back to top  
Straudos



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 466

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:52 am    Post subject:  

There isn't a nation in the world that would risk its soldiers' lives by stationing them around Israel. Think Somalia.
Back to top  
Kane



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 12677
Location: Bay Area, CA

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 12:04 pm    Post subject:  

Straudos wrote: There isn't a nation in the world that would risk its soldiers' lives by stationing them around Israel. Think Somalia.

In Somalia they ventured into the city...this would purely be on the border.
Back to top  
Secondary Oak



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 3418
Location: Haifa

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 12:20 pm    Post subject:  

Kane wrote: Well, I don't think either party at this time is able or willing to solve this situation...so let's do it. Send in a UN/EU/US peace keeping force along the Pre-1967 Borders and then lets see what happens...
It's unlikely Israel would agree with any foreign power, international or not, sitting on the green line.

I know I would be furious if it will.
Back to top  
Straudos



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 466

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:57 pm    Post subject:  

Quote: In Somalia they ventured into the city...this would purely be on the border. That won't stop some mortar attacks, etc. You underestimate how small the region really is. Any foreign power that goes in there to "keep the peace" will come out bloodied, even if it is just a few soldiers. That's all that is needed, though.
Back to top  
Gnostic



Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 5382
Location: An asylum near you!

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 4:30 pm    Post subject:  

Straudos wrote: There isn't a nation in the world that would risk its soldiers' lives by stationing them around Israel. Think Somalia.

It looks like peacekeeping soldiers are needed just to keep the Pals from killing each other, much less.
Back to top  
Kane



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 12677
Location: Bay Area, CA

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 4:53 pm    Post subject:  

Secondary Oak wrote: Kane wrote: Well, I don't think either party at this time is able or willing to solve this situation...so let's do it. Send in a UN/EU/US peace keeping force along the Pre-1967 Borders and then lets see what happens...
It's unlikely Israel would agree with any foreign power, international or not, sitting on the green line.

I know I would be furious if it will.

Why? Your military could capitalize on the situation by still creating military blockades behind the UN/EU/US wall of troops...increasing the odds at which you'll apprehend any terrorists beforehand. I'm more or less interested in seeing how the Palestinians would react to a national peacekeeping force and how that force would be responding to any mortar/rocket attacks...

An international force such as that has the potential to dissuade daily militia attacks and force them to attempt to capitalize on terrorism...which would then fail catastrophically. All the Israeli beatings and killings of Palestinians the media likes to show in the Middle East would evaporate and be replaced with UN peacekeepers and their extreme restraint. Aggression would purely be on their part at that point...and there's a chance the various populations of the region would pick up on that.
Back to top  
Secondary Oak



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 3418
Location: Haifa

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:16 pm    Post subject:  

Kane wrote: Secondary Oak wrote: It's unlikely Israel would agree with any foreign power, international or not, sitting on the green line.

I know I would be furious if it will.

Why?
Because the presence of another entity there will hinder Israel's ability to act, while contributing nothing (most likely) to Israel's security.
Back to top  
superskippy



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 8680
Location: Petah Tikva

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:19 pm    Post subject:  

As well as the fact that we are a fiercly independent nation and we dont want tens of thousands of troops on our borders that could potentially hinder our actions by attempting to supercede or stop our own plans and actions.
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Middle East Politics Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group