Political Crossfire Forums

Gryff1nd0r · Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Posts: 2347 Location: Cambridge, MA

Aren't you bored? At some point in the debate, you must meet the untenable roadblock of arbitrary boundaries and irrational moral reasoning. So far, I've never seen anyone get by that roadblock.

The Grandmaster

Gryff1nd0r wrote: Aren't you bored?

Yes.

Gryff1nd0r wrote: At some point in the debate, you must meet the untenable roadblock of arbitrary boundaries and irrational moral reasoning.

Pretty Much.

Gryff1nd0r wrote: So far, I've never seen anyone get by that roadblock.

Yup. Search through my abortions posts. You’ll see I’ve posted virtually nothing this month. I am sort of tired of the same old s**t. I feel like I’ve beaten everyone on here on the other side again and again. (Gilbert however, was very tough, and a strong opponent). It really is, the same ol’ s**t, time and time and time and time again. It’s basically a rubics cube, where once you know all the argument lines, the challenge is gone, and there is nothing more to do. Basically, it’s just the whole “it’s her fault and life begins at blah blah blah murder blah blah” s**t, and it doesn’t matter what you show them, they’ll simply start a new thread and start it all over. I have retired from abortion, coming out only from time to time now, just for ***** and giggles. I feel my time spent here would be better suited for my 3D Animation/Photoshop training. There’s really only so much on the subject to know.

Revenant · Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 16428 Location: Bliss

I debate it to grossly offend for my self amusement.

The Grandmaster · Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:55 pm Post subject:

Renevant wrote: I debate it to grossly offend for my self amusement.

The Best Answer I have heard. :lol:

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

For Life and the cure for cancer.

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

Plodder wrote: For Life and the cure for cancer.

...?

Where did cancer come from?

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

ah the first to ask me :)

I belive that the cure for cancer will be found not by killing babies but by making them and having them.
I also belive that the persobn wo would have discovered it has been aborted in the USA.

Prole · Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 2246 Location: Edinburgh

Why do I debate? Just to see how long people can cling to irrational and ignorant positions. I do enjoy having my mind boggled.

Plodder wrote: ah the first to ask me :)

I belive that the cure for cancer will be found not by killing babies but by making them and having them.
I also belive that the persobn wo would have discovered it has been aborted in the USA.
Luckily, the person who would have created a virus that would have destroyed humanity also was aborted. So in the end, everything is wonderful! :lol:

mattwa33193 · Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 904 Location: Miami

Plodder wrote: ah the first to ask me :)

I belive that the cure for cancer will be found not by killing babies but by making them and having them.
I also belive that the persobn wo would have discovered it has been aborted in the USA.

Yes, but he would have likely been born into a poor inner city family, never gotten an education let alone become a doctor, and carried his hidden ability to cure cancer to the electric chair with him.

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

Quote:
Yes, but he would have likely been born into a poor inner city family, never gotten an education let alone become a doctor, and carried his hidden ability to cure cancer to the electric chair with him. electric chair is ilegal.

not only that bbut very few people are executed every year.

still, many rich people get abortions simply because they dont feel like having children to bother to take care of.

amd if he was the person destined to cure cancer then he would die, hed find the cure.

steen · Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Upper Midwest

Plodder wrote: amd if he was the person destined to cure cancer then he would die, hed find the cure. Please provide the evidence of this "destiny" you are claiming to exist. And please show that this person wouldn't have been the next Stalin or McVeigh instead.

AllAmericanMan · Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 3606

Speaking of circular arguments....what if if was was and was is if?

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

Quote: Please provide the evidence of this "destiny" you are claiming to exist. And please show that this person wouldn't have been the next Stalin or McVeigh instead. you cannot prove the future. your statment is rediculous.

mattwa33193 · Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 904 Location: Miami

Plodder wrote: Quote: Please provide the evidence of this "destiny" you are claiming to exist. And please show that this person wouldn't have been the next Stalin or McVeigh instead. you cannot prove the future. your statment is rediculous.

But your entire argument is based on predicting the future.

steen · Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Upper Midwest

Plodder wrote: Quote: Please provide the evidence of this "destiny" you are claiming to exist. And please show that this person wouldn't have been the next Stalin or McVeigh instead. you cannot prove the future. your statment is rediculous. I am pleased that you admit the nonsense about a destiny to be utter nonsense and lies.

That it no is your own claim that you are admitting as a lie, that is a positive development in you returning from the abyss of endless lies where you have spent your time.

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

AllAmericanMan wrote: Speaking of circular arguments....what if if was was and was is if?

What is mind?... No matter.

What is matter?... Never mind.

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

Quote: I am pleased that you admit the nonsense about a destiny to be utter nonsense and lies. while I said that you cannot prove the future , that did not mean that you can not belive what might be possible.

I never afmitted to anything you said and your entire post is and evil lie.

LostSoul3412 · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 7781

Plodder wrote: Quote: I am pleased that you admit the nonsense about a destiny to be utter nonsense and lies. while I said that you cannot prove the future , that did not mean that you can not belive what might be possible.

I never afmitted to anything you said and your entire post is and evil lie.

You still contradict your own argument. If you are able to speculate the future, then why is steen's request for you to "please show that this person wouldn't have been the next Stalin or McVeigh instead", wrong?

Because it damages your argument, or is there an actual reason behind it?

steen · Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Upper Midwest

Plodder wrote: Quote: I am pleased that you admit the nonsense about a destiny to be utter nonsense and lies. while I said that you cannot prove the future , that did not mean that you can not belive what might be possible. Sure. It might be possible that those who are not aborted will be new versions of McVeigh, Dahmer or Stalin.

Quote: I never afmitted to anything you said and your entire post is and evil lie. Well, initially, you stated that: "amd if he was the person destined to cure cancer then he would die, hed find the cure." Now you say that "you cannot prove the future. your statment is rediculous."

So very clearly, your second quote shows that you were lying when you made your first quote. AS I POINTED OUT! I don't know what you think you gain from denying your PROVEN lies, other than that you have no credibility, honesty or integrity.

Plodder · Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 803 Location: USA

wrong wrong and wrong again until you both learn to read english.

i have no proof for my first stament. howver that does not mean it is impossible. sure you can say we have killed the next stalin, but stalin killed 5 million in his long rein while cancer kills :Cancer causes 7 million deaths every year—or 12.5% of deaths worldwide. ...
www.who.int/cancer/en/ so
so i prefer a cure for cancer and and a stalin to not having both.