| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sataere
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:34 pm Post subject: Some heterosexuality in gays? |
|
|
| It just really hit me today, when gay men act feminine isn't that showing some heterosexuality, or at least gender confusion? And when lesbian females act masculine doesn't that also show it? I don't know If I'm really interpreting it right at all, but if gay couples truly loved the same sex as who they were, wouldn't gay men be extremely masculine and gay women act extremely feminine? Any ideas on the reasons for this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Enoch
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 8471
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:59 pm Post subject: Re: Some heterosexuality in gays? |
|
|
Sataere wrote: It just really hit me today, when gay men act feminine isn't that showing some heterosexuality, or at least gender confusion? And when lesbian females act masculine doesn't that also show it? I don't know If I'm really interpreting it right at all, but if gay couples truly loved the same sex as who they were, wouldn't gay men be extremely masculine and gay women act extremely feminine? Any ideas on the reasons for this?
You are confusing sexual orientation and gender. Those are two completely seperate issues.
Sexual orientation is completely independent of whether or not someone shows masculine, feminine, or androgynous traits. Straight men can be feminine, and still be straight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Leon Czolgosz
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 190
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I truely understand what it is to be gay now thanks to that original post, as you have confused me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ToonArmyIsComing
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 5888
Location: Ontario
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: Some heterosexuality in gays? |
|
|
UrielsFyre wrote: Sataere wrote: It just really hit me today, when gay men act feminine isn't that showing some heterosexuality, or at least gender confusion? And when lesbian females act masculine doesn't that also show it? I don't know If I'm really interpreting it right at all, but if gay couples truly loved the same sex as who they were, wouldn't gay men be extremely masculine and gay women act extremely feminine? Any ideas on the reasons for this?
You are confusing sexual orientation and gender. Those are two completely seperate issues.
Sexual orientation is completely independent of whether or not someone shows masculine, feminine, or androgynous traits. Straight men can be feminine, and still be straight.
No, because characteristics are gendered by the society (ie: strength being a manly thing). The gays are only "confused" in that they don't follow the social construct of gender role.
Amusingly though, gays are also influenced by the gay culture, which also constructs men as who "feminine".
I witnessed this first hand: I used to have a friend who was gay, but was really "manly". When he started sociolizing with some really "feminine" gay people, he really changed in terms of his behaviour, etc and became more like them. So there is a great social influence in how gays behave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Enoch
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 8471
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: Re: Some heterosexuality in gays? |
|
|
ToonArmyIsComing wrote: UrielsFyre wrote: Sataere wrote: It just really hit me today, when gay men act feminine isn't that showing some heterosexuality, or at least gender confusion? And when lesbian females act masculine doesn't that also show it? I don't know If I'm really interpreting it right at all, but if gay couples truly loved the same sex as who they were, wouldn't gay men be extremely masculine and gay women act extremely feminine? Any ideas on the reasons for this?
You are confusing sexual orientation and gender. Those are two completely seperate issues.
Sexual orientation is completely independent of whether or not someone shows masculine, feminine, or androgynous traits. Straight men can be feminine, and still be straight.
No, because characteristics are gendered by the society (ie: strength being a manly thing). The gays are only "confused" in that they don't follow the social construct of gender role.
Amusingly though, gays are also influenced by the gay culture, which also constructs men as who "feminine".
I witnessed this first hand: I used to have a friend who was gay, but was really "manly". When he started sociolizing with some really "feminine" gay people, he really changed in terms of his behaviour, etc and became more like them. So there is a great social influence in how gays behave. As a gay man, I think I have a bit more experience with the gay community than you do.
But, that still doesn't matter.
Sexual orientation and affectation (masculine, feminine) are independent characteristics. There is NO evidence to link them. You can find masculine gay men and feminine straight men. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Æ
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 4980
Location: Flavoring the People
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Some heterosexuality in gays? |
|
|
ToonArmyIsComing wrote: No, because characteristics are gendered by the society (ie: strength being a manly thing). The gays are only "confused" in that they don't follow the social construct of gender role.
Many people don't follow the construct of gender role. Those who do follow it suffer unnecessarily.
Quote: Amusingly though, gays are also influenced by the gay culture, which also constructs men as who "feminine".
This is a generalization and an incorrect one at that.
Quote: I witnessed this first hand: I used to have a friend who was gay, but was really "manly". When he started sociolizing with some really "feminine" gay people, he really changed in terms of his behaviour, etc and became more like them. So there is a great social influence in how gays behave.
There is great social influnce in how everyone behaves. As opposed to individual relationships, group relationships are more utilitarian and individual differences become less important than group cohesion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
|