Political Crossfire Forums Index Political Crossfire Forums
Discuss and Debate Political, cultural and social issues.

 Political Crossfire Forums Index

People are safer in UK because guns are banned
Click here to go to the original topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Gun Control
Click here to go to the original topic        View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OneZero



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 3413

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:46 am    Post subject: People are safer in UK because guns are banned  

www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060309-015434-9184r

Especially the kids. :roll:
Back to top  
whatsthepoint



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 1235

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:19 pm    Post subject:  

What does this have to do with gun control?
Back to top  
thundertaker



Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 12845
Location: The right side of the Pennines (Lancashire)

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:06 pm    Post subject:  

Were exaclty do guns come into the equation here? Maybe if this was america, those scumbags would have threatened to shoot him instead of stab him?
Back to top  
mattman42



Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 661
Location: Maine

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:42 pm    Post subject:  

Why was his desire to wear body armor ever questioned in the first place? Does wearing body armor somehow put others in danger?
Back to top  
KOV-14



Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 133

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:25 pm    Post subject:  

Switzerland is safer because everyone owns automatic rifles. It's not that simple...
Back to top  
Wolverine



Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 11171
Location: Podunk, Colorado

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:27 pm    Post subject:  

Handgun crime 'up' despite ban
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1440764.stm
Back to top  
Jefferson



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3342

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:41 pm    Post subject:  

whatsthepoint wrote: What does this have to do with gun control?

It is an example that total ban on guns does not solve crime. It is an example that a murder will use any when the will is there and gun control does not change the will of a murder.
Back to top  
whatsthepoint



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 1235

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:44 pm    Post subject:  

Jefferson wrote: whatsthepoint wrote: What does this have to do with gun control?

It is an example that total ban on guns does not solve crime. It is an example that a murder will use any when the will is there and gun control does not change the will of a murder. So you want the child walking around with a gun? OK if you say so.
Back to top  
KOV-14



Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 133

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:46 pm    Post subject:  

Terrorists in 9/11 used box cutter knives to hijack the planes. Those aren't even weapons by most people's personal standards... Ban of all firearms, and weapons wouldn't solve the problem of the society having dangerous people.
Back to top  
OneZero



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 3413

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:59 pm    Post subject:  

You will never ever ever be able to stop people from killing other people.
Back to top  
Jefferson



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3342

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:14 pm    Post subject:  

whatsthepoint wrote: Jefferson wrote: whatsthepoint wrote: What does this have to do with gun control?

It is an example that total ban on guns does not solve crime. It is an example that a murder will use any when the will is there and gun control does not change the will of a murder. So you want the child walking around with a gun? OK if you say so.

Only an idiot like you would think I approve of such a thing or that the laws in my country allow it.

So what made you think I want such a thing?

Maybe becuase your dumb
Back to top  
alclarkey



Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 1809

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:22 am    Post subject:  

whatsthepoint wrote: Jefferson wrote: whatsthepoint wrote: What does this have to do with gun control?

It is an example that total ban on guns does not solve crime. It is an example that a murder will use any when the will is there and gun control does not change the will of a murder. So you want the child walking around with a gun? OK if you say so.
I don't think anyone was advocating that. If there were guns around, that body armor would've been protecting that. But since there aren't guns, the human feces will have to use knives. Lack of guns does not = lack of violence.
Back to top  
Lucky Luke



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 8662
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:09 am    Post subject: Re: People are safer in UK because guns are banned  

OneZero wrote: www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060309-015434-9184r

Especially the kids. :roll:

Another thread about a sob story of a poor kid. OneZero are you afraid of facts that you always post about emotion and children?

:-D
:-D
Back to top  
Saracen



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 16683
Location: On Earth

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:14 am    Post subject:  

Lucky Luke wrote: Another thread about a sob story of a poor kid. OneZero are you afraid of facts that you always post about emotion and children?


I think you missed this story.
Back to top  
Lucky Luke



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 8662
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:37 am    Post subject:  

mattman42 wrote: Why was his desire to wear body armor ever questioned in the first place? Does wearing body armor somehow put others in danger?

I believe the sale to children of body armour is illegal and schools are responsible for the safety of the children, not the children themselves.

If you think pupils in the UK should wear body armour to protect themselves against the eventuality of being stabbed, you Mattman42 would have to supply a bullet proof jacket to every school American kids first.

:-D
:-D
Back to top  
Lucky Luke



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 8662
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:54 am    Post subject:  

Saracen wrote: Lucky Luke wrote: Another thread about a sob story of a poor kid. OneZero are you afraid of facts that you always post about emotion and children?


I think you missed this story.

I'll show you what you missed in your own little story:

The date:
Quote: Monday, 16 July, 2001

The timetable and the word "suggests":
Quote: A new study suggests the use of handguns in crime rose by 40% in the two years after the weapons were banned.

The fact that they are our NRA:
Quote: The research, commissioned by the Countryside Alliance's Campaign for Shooting

You see posting a link doesn't prove a thing, next time post the relevant quote with the link and at least read the article not just the title Saracen.

:-D
:-D
Back to top  
Lucky Luke



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 8662
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:46 am    Post subject:  

OneZero wrote: You will never ever ever be able to stop people from killing other people.

You can make it a lot more difficult by toughening up your gun control laws when the murder rate of a country is insane and/or the majority of murders are committed with handguns.

Some countries like the UK and Switzerland decided to toughening up their gun control laws after some massacre even when their murder rate were already very low, good for them.

:-D
:-D
Back to top  
Lucky Luke



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 8662
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:58 am    Post subject:  

KOV-14 wrote: Switzerland is safer because everyone owns automatic rifles. It's not that simple...

It is very simple for the Swiss, they have introduced tough gun control laws and they are in the process of adopting more tougher European ones.

If you want to own an automatic rifle like the Swiss join the army, you have that choice that Swiss haven't got.

:-D
:-D
Back to top  
Robin Hood



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3295

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:58 am    Post subject:  

This entire thread is irrelevant:

A new study suggests the use of handguns in crime rose by 40% in the two years after the weapons were banned.

http://news.billinge.com/1/hi/uk/1440764.stm
Back to top  
whatsthepoint



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 1235

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:49 am    Post subject:  

Jefferson wrote: whatsthepoint wrote: Jefferson wrote: whatsthepoint wrote: What does this have to do with gun control?

It is an example that total ban on guns does not solve crime. It is an example that a murder will use any when the will is there and gun control does not change the will of a murder. So you want the child walking around with a gun? OK if you say so.

Only an idiot like you would think I approve of such a thing or that the laws in my country allow it.

So what made you think I want such a thing?

Maybe becuase your dumb Reduced to personal attacks. How sad.
Back to top  
Click here to go to the original topic
       Political Crossfire Forums Index -> Gun Control Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

Political Forums|Politics Connected|Contact Us



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group