Political Crossfire Forums

[LostSoul3412]

Izzibeth wrote: attacking one another on a personal level pretty much makes the argument about your original topic come to a complete standstill. you're getting nowhere with those one-liners.

Agreed, can we get back to the issue, please?

[LostSoul3412]

Plodder wrote: amazing how you can delude yourself into beliving any sources presented by a pro lifer are auotmatically false. You are amazing in the fact that youre so predictable.

Ok, now I guess it's my turn to troll.

Hypocrite.

Aren't you the one who proclaimed all sources the the pro-choice camp provided as "liberal lies"? Aren't you the one who refused every source from a medical dictionary to Stanford University as "liberal lies"?

Before you attack someone else, make sure that you have not already committed the same crime.

Now then, let's get back to abortion...

[Plodder]

i was demonstrating how steen responds and i am glad that you realize how booring it gets.

[LostSoul3412]

Plodder wrote: i was demonstrating how steen responds and i am glad that you realize how booring it gets.

:roll:

You attack his behavior by copying it...

Monkey see, monkey do, I suppose.

[Plodder]

no just a demonstration. i dont intend to do it anymore . i will just say troll.

[LostSoul3412]

Good, then let's get back to the issue of your "scientific study on abortions" that you cite as evidence.

LostSoul3412 wrote: Plodder wrote: If one of my old class mates were here then they would vouch for me. but seeing as they are not and that not everything is on the internet I cannot continue past this point.

Then your "evidence" of the "scientific study" on abortions is discredited.

[Plodder]

i guess seeing is beliveing for you.

[LostSoul3412]

Plodder wrote: i guess seeing is beliveing for you.

Quite the opposite, actually.

But of course you would think that there must be something wrong with me because I don't believe in your claim that you saw a "scientific study" on abortion that has no title and no references to it anywhere on the internet, heard testimony from an "expert professional" without a name or any references to him/her on the internet, and that your friend agrees with you all of your proposed evidence must be true.

Yes... I'm the one who's wrong here. :roll:

[Plodder]

i could not find anything on the study because it was done beofre the creation of the internet or most modern computers. I gave a name and a site. so yes you are wrong.

[Timur The Lame]

Nope, I have never had to see one in person, but I’ve seen videos and pictures of fetal porn.

Oh, and I believe in one’s right to get rid of a parasite in one’s body, irregardless if it is that person’s fault or not (who’s mourning the parasites that are killed when ones eats a bad piece of meat? Same principle as abortions in my opinion, it’s just that humans are anthropocentric) .

[steen]

Plodder wrote: i could not find anything on the study because it was done beofre the creation of the internet or most modern computers. I gave a name and a site. so yes you are wrong. The name and the site did not document a study. And while it might not be on-line, it would be in a scientific journal somewhere. Feel free to give us the reference.

No? :roll:

[Plodder]

im not going down to georgetown to find this, and why should I justify my self seeing as how im not the one suspended for treating others like dirt.