Political Crossfire Forums

Wolverine · Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 10980 Location: Podunk, Colorado

PETA kills animals..... don't they take others to court for that?

Whats the word... its starts with an "h"...... hypo...... hippo..... oh yes, hypocrites.
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

George W Bush · Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Yes, and making a website .. MAKES IT OFFICIAL!!

I can make a website too that reflects the ammunition needed to enrage the public.

20 bucks and hosting fees is all it takes.

Give it up.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

mathurin · Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject:

if you look closely at that site they have scans of public documents that PETA has to file, and in another thread i also searched out and found the blank document that the state requires to be filled out on animals, it is undeniable documentation, PETA has euthanized alot of animals, a larger percentage than the local shelter

Wolverine · Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 10980 Location: Podunk, Colorado

George W Bush wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yes, and making a website .. MAKES IT OFFICIAL!!

I can make a website too that reflects the ammunition needed to enrage the public.

20 bucks and hosting fees is all it takes.

Give it up.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
:? I didn't make the website, I wouldn't even know where to start.
To the point,
Do I smell more ownage?

Quote: DON'T BE FOOLED by the slick propaganda of PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The organization may claim to champion the welfare of animals, as the many photos of cute puppies and kittens on its Web site suggest. But last week, two PETA employees were charged with 31 felony counts of animal cruelty each, after authorities found them dumping the dead bodies of 18 animals they had just picked up from a North Carolina animal shelter into a Dumpster. According to the Associated Press, 13 more dead animals were found in a van registered to PETA.
Oohh, and its from the San Francisco Chronicle too.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/06/23/EDG11DC9BK1.DTL

Kindred · Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject:

My understanding is that they kidnapped some dogs from a pound so that they could euthanise the animals using a more humane method.

Taliesin · Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:08 pm Post subject:

Most of the info on there looks legit, however, the man who runs it also runs a lobbying firm so I would look into what his intentions are.

mathurin · Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject:

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

this is a scan of the forms PETA must fill out on the animals it takes it, the state requires it, this shows without a doubt that they have euthanized animals, i have gone and found the blank form before, it is legit

Kindred · Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:58 am Post subject:

mathurin wrote: http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

this is a scan of the forms PETA must fill out on the animals it takes it, the state requires it, this shows without a doubt that they have euthanized animals, i have gone and found the blank form before, it is legit

Seems like an objective site.......

TNBiologist · Joined: 31 Jan 2006 Posts: 962 Location: Tennessee

How about this, PETA stated that they would rather elephants starve to death in an African nation than be adopted by a Zoo.

http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/headline/2972

PETA: Elephants Better Off Dead Than Fed

The animal-killing wingnuts at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have committed themselves to replacing the real circus (the kind with elephants and clowns) with a media circus (the kind with gray-skinned and humorless vegans). The Chicago City Council is holding a public hearing next week for an ordinance that would multiply by ten the living space that a zoo or circus must set aside for elephants. If passed, the law would effectively ban from Chicago all traditional circuses (you know, the fun kind).

For all its indignant protests, however, PETA's own record with elephants isn't exactly spotless. In 2003, the tiny African nation of Swaziland found itself facing a drought with eleven extra elephants on hand. These giant pachyderms aren't exactly light eaters, and the extra animals would have caused serious damage to already scarce crops and vegetation. King Mswati III agreed to have two American zoos take the elephants as an alternative to shooting them.

PETA and other animal rights groups complained bitterly. One particularly clueless PETA staffer whined to a San Diego TV station that "[z]oos should be protecting animals in their homelands, not snatching them away from their homes and loved ones." Of course, the elephants in question were orphans. And we're pretty sure zoos are around so you don't have to fly to Africa to learn about exotic animals.

PETA and company also threatened a tourist boycott of the tiny, tourism-dependent country if it gave the animals away, to the dismay and insult of one Swazi game ranger:

They rushed to the press with threats of a tourist boycott without even speaking to us, and their tone is that we are ignorant incompetents who are insensitive to animal welfare and incapable of handling our own affairs.
Mindless sentimentalism for animals mixed with contempt for human beings is a PETA specialty, but the group didn't stop there. In a court hearing arranged to try and block importation of the Swazi animals, the lawyer representing a bevy of animal-rights groups (PETA foremost among them) told the judge: "If the elephants are euthanized in Swaziland ... that would be a better outcome."

Strangely, PETA's "Save Wild Elephants" website doesn't mention anything about their support for killing wild elephants in order to "save" them.