| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pharaoh
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1526
Location: Inside the Pyramide!
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: Need help real fast about the maginot line (map) |
|
|
I made this bet. Im like 99% sure that the maginot line was along the french and german frontiers but I saw this map on wiki that shows that the line extends to the low lands??!
So can anybody provide me with a detailed map of the maginot line JUST along the French and German frontiers?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
antonio62
Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 2122
Location: In a forest unknown
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It was extended to cover the low country's after the French realised that they could be flanked. I don't believe it was ever finished completely though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
pharaoh
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1526
Location: Inside the Pyramide!
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
antonio62 wrote: It was extended to cover the low country's after the French realised that they could be flanked. I don't believe it was ever finished completely though.
Oupsy...but wasnt the purpose of the German attack on the low countries was to outflank the line?! This is really weird |
|
| Back to top |
|
thundertaker
Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 12089
Location: The right side of the Pennines (Lancashire)
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought they didn't bother to fortify the area around the Ardennes forest properly because they thought it was impenetrable to tanks, but they turned out to be very very wrong....... |
|
| Back to top |
|
pharaoh
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1526
Location: Inside the Pyramide!
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thundertaker wrote: I thought they didn't bother to fortify the area around the Ardennes forest properly because they thought it was impenetrable to tanks, but they turned out to be very very wrong.......
yes. So do you by chance have a map to help me out?! (we are talking about a 50$ bet!) :-| |
|
| Back to top |
|
antonio62
Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 2122
Location: In a forest unknown
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pharaoh wrote: antonio62 wrote: It was extended to cover the low country's after the French realised that they could be flanked. I don't believe it was ever finished completely though.
Oupsy...but wasnt the purpose of the German attack on the low countries was to outflank the line?! This is really weird
Yeh it was they realised to late and never totally finished it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Secondary Oak
Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 3395
Location: Haifa
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:54 pm Post subject: Re: Need help real fast about the maginot line (map) |
|
|
pharaoh wrote: I made this bet. Im like 99% sure that the maginot line was along the french and german frontiers but I saw this map on wiki that shows that the line extends to the low lands??!
So can anybody provide me with a detailed map of the maginot line JUST along the French and German frontiers?
Thanks
From that Wikipedia article:
"The fortifications did not extend through the Ardennes Forest (which was believed to be "impénétrable" and "impassable") or along the border with Belgium because the countries had signed an alliance in 1920, by which the French army would operate in Belgium if the German forces invaded. When Belgium abrogated the treaty in 1936 and declared neutrality, the Maginot Line was quickly extended along the Franco-Belgian border, but not to the standard of the rest of the Line."
I'd say you lost... unless the bet was about a specific date. |
|
| Back to top |
|
John Galt
Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 20982
Location: Minnesota
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wouldn't try to find out the answer to a bet from Wikipedia, even if it is correct in this case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Secondary Oak
Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 3395
Location: Haifa
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John Galt wrote: I wouldn't try to find out the answer to a bet from Wikipedia, even if it is correct in this case.
Since there's a bet involved you may be right... but Wikipedia is usually very accurate when it comes to non-contested facts such as this one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
pharaoh
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1526
Location: Inside the Pyramide!
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I found 4 maps on the net that shows that the line didnt extend to the Belgium frontiers.
Also most histoty books say it clearly that the point of attacking the low countries, by Germany, was to outflank the line. They didnt say because the line was weak there but to outflank it.
Seems this bet gonna end up in a tie... :-| |
|
| Back to top |
|
mathurin
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 7231
Location: kansas, with every muscle strained to leave
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the line was not initially built along that border because france had alliances of some kind with belgium (or whetever other low countries are there, i dont care to dig up a map
so it would be like america building massive fortifications along the border with canada because we think they will be overrun by the soviets and attack from the north, not conducive to an alliance
after a time (i think somebody said 1936) the treaties kind of dissolved or something, and the line was extended, but nowhere near the strength of the line in the alsace region
they didnt fortify the ardennes because they though it was impossible to get through, they didnt count on cutting down the trees, a few listening posts in the forest and history might have changed a bit, if i recall it took the germans sometime to get through the forest, and the forest is a great place to engage a mechanized force with non-mech troops |
|
| Back to top |
|
bob.appleyard
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 7596
Location: Manchestar, innit
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mathurin wrote: the line was not initially built along that border because france had alliances of some kind with belgium (or whetever other low countries are there, i dont care to dig up a map
Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Saracen
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 15867
Location: On Earth
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pharaoh, why the heck did you make a bet? Don't you know that bets are a form of gambling? And you know what Islam says about gambling, right? ;) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |