Political Crossfire Forums

[Ewrue The Veracious]

Why do hollywood producers insist on only markiting and produsing movies about Queers. why must everything inthe world include less than .1% of the population every T.V. show has a queer on it there have been several movies about queer shepards in wyoming. I lived in wyoming there are now queers there lots of shepards however, but that is beside the point. the more crap that media pumps out about queers the more i dislike their cause. the best thing for queers to do is keep it to them selves and quit forcing your belifes down our throughts or i might just start focing my catholic views down your throat.

[Melchior]

Oh god.

First of all, I still don't believe that .1% figure, it's bulls**t.

Secondly, are you seriously complaining about the fact that homosexual characters are allowed on TV and in the Movies? That sounds incredibly prejudice, and ignorant to assume they there is a central agenda behind all of it.

Homosexuality is becoming a more relaxed, and more of a popular interest in both debate, acceptance, and fiction. What's difficult to grasp?

[RealRepublicanArmy]

Firstly, your a biggot and I hope this thread gets locked and you get banned. Secondly, call them gays or homosexuals. Thirdly, your a biggot.

[Melchior]

RealRepublicanArmy wrote: Firstly, your a biggot and I hope this thread gets locked and you get banned. Secondly, call them gays or homosexuals. Thirdly, your a biggot.

Stop copying my format. :lol:

[Matthew18]

They can be what ever they went if they keep it behind there bed room doors. I don't went to know. Who cares what you are or what you think you are. Goverment just needs to stay out of it.

[RealRepublicanArmy]

Melchior wrote: RealRepublicanArmy wrote: Firstly, your a biggot and I hope this thread gets locked and you get banned. Secondly, call them gays or homosexuals. Thirdly, your a biggot.

Stop copying my format. :lol:

Effective is as effective does :wink:

[Melchior]

Matthew18 wrote: They can be what ever they went if they keep it behind there bed room doors. I don't went to know. Who cares what you are or what you think you are. Goverment just needs to stay out of it.

I don't see why same-sex fictional romance shouldn't be allowed and hetero-sex fictional romance should be prefered.

[Seixon]

Come on guys, he is making a good point, although perhaps not in a very good way.

Isn't there a bit too much homosexual exposure in Hollywood and on TV compared with real life?

I don't think the gay population is only 0.1%, but still, homosexuality has received a very disproportionate amount of attention in the media.

Try to remember when women's rights was the chic thing in media shows (I'm really not old enough to know, other than watching Nick At Nite... Mary Tyler Moore anyone?). Now, compare that with the current infatuation with homosexuality.

Then consider the fact that around 50% of the population are women.

:think:

[Matthew18]

Just nature reasons...In two men having you know what is not nature. But who is me to say that that is not normal? I say its ok but I would rather you not tell me in keep it behind your door.

But I have mixed feelings about it.

[Ewrue The Veracious]

Melchior wrote: Oh god.

First of all, I still don't believe that .1% figure, it's bulls**t.

Secondly, are you seriously complaining about the fact that homosexual characters are allowed on TV and in the Movies? That sounds incredibly prejudice, and ignorant to assume they there is a central agenda behind all of it.

Homosexuality is becoming a more relaxed, and more of a popular interest in both debate, acceptance, and fiction. What's difficult to grasp? go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer. why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce. all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back. besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric. if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.

[Melchior]

Seixon wrote: Isn't there a bit too much homosexual exposure in Hollywood and on TV compared with real life?

It's just a hot topic right now.

I don't think there is that much of it anyway, besides gay love stories go waaaaaaaaay back in time, so as far as I'm concern they are engraved in human history.

Seixon wrote: I don't think the gay population is only 0.1%, but still, homosexuality has received a very disproportionate amount of attention in the media.

Like I said, it's a popular issue.

The media goes crazy about everything.

Seixon wrote: Try to remember when women's rights was the chic thing in media shows (I'm really not old enough to know, other than watching Nick At Nite... Mary Tyler Moore anyone?). Now, compare that with the current infatuation with homosexuality.

Then consider the fact that around 50% of the population are women.

:think:

Now that notion I don't agree with, 1% or 50%, a lower number in population doesn't mean a less significant cause.

Besides Seixon, the topic of the thread is about some kind of agenda, and the idea that homosexuals shouldn't be on TV or in the Movies at all.

[Ewrue The Veracious]

Seixon wrote: Come on guys, he is making a good point, although perhaps not in a very good way.

Isn't there a bit too much homosexual exposure in Hollywood and on TV compared with real life?

I don't think the gay population is only 0.1%, but still, homosexuality has received a very disproportionate amount of attention in the media.

Try to remember when women's rights was the chic thing in media shows (I'm really not old enough to know, other than watching Nick At Nite... Mary Tyler Moore anyone?). Now, compare that with the current infatuation with homosexuality.

Then consider the fact that around 50% of the population are women.

:think: good point my friend i don't hate queers i just think they are nailing their own coffin shut by propaganda and bullying the population with lawsutes and hatecrimes.

[Matthew18]

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: Melchior wrote: Oh god.

First of all, I still don't believe that .1% figure, it's bulls**t.

Secondly, are you seriously complaining about the fact that homosexual characters are allowed on TV and in the Movies? That sounds incredibly prejudice, and ignorant to assume they there is a central agenda behind all of it.

Homosexuality is becoming a more relaxed, and more of a popular interest in both debate, acceptance, and fiction. What's difficult to grasp? go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer. why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce. all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back. besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric. if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.



I agree to a point...But I think people should be able to do things in there own room as they please. The smaller the goverment the better!

[Obilisk18]

All kidding aside, I do believe that it is becoming rather trendy in hollywood to make movies which in some way address homosexuality or gender identity. I am reminded of the late 60's through the early 80's when Hollywood seemed positively giddy with the thought of being able to tackle race relations in a substantive way. The result was often well meaning films like Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, which initially felt quite poignant, but in retrospect seem somewhat silly and stereotypical. My question is, are movies like these which address complex fluxating social issues almost destined to date themselves in the future? I enjoyed Brokeback Mountain well enough, and part of that enjoyment stemmed from the fact that it didn't feel at all stereotypical, but then, neither did Guess Who's Coming to Dinner in 1967.

[foadi]

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: Melchior wrote: Oh god.

First of all, I still don't believe that .1% figure, it's bulls**t.

Secondly, are you seriously complaining about the fact that homosexual characters are allowed on TV and in the Movies? That sounds incredibly prejudice, and ignorant to assume they there is a central agenda behind all of it.

Homosexuality is becoming a more relaxed, and more of a popular interest in both debate, acceptance, and fiction. What's difficult to grasp? go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer. why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce. all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back. besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric. if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.
This sounds like plasticky-fake posturing to me. Given that 94.5945945345338372% of the population is biologically bisexual, it stands to reason that most of those claiming 100% heterosexuality are merely posturing due to societal conditioning, given that only around 3.191489361702127659574468085106% out of the population of the 94.5945945345338372% will actually be biologically monosexual heterosexuals.

[Ewrue The Veracious]

Melchior wrote: Seixon wrote: Isn't there a bit too much homosexual exposure in Hollywood and on TV compared with real life?

It's just a hot topic right now.

I don't think there is that much of it anyway, besides gay love stories go waaaaaaaaay back in time, so as far as I'm concern they are engraved in human history.

Seixon wrote: I don't think the gay population is only 0.1%, but still, homosexuality has received a very disproportionate amount of attention in the media.

Like I said, it's a popular issue.

The media goes crazy about everything.

Seixon wrote: Try to remember when women's rights was the chic thing in media shows (I'm really not old enough to know, other than watching Nick At Nite... Mary Tyler Moore anyone?). Now, compare that with the current infatuation with homosexuality.

Then consider the fact that around 50% of the population are women.

:think:

Now that notion I don't agree with, 1% or 50%, a lower number in population doesn't mean a less significant cause.

Besides Seixon, the topic of the thread is about some kind of agenda, and the idea that homosexuals shouldn't be on TV or in the Movies at all. all i am saying is that the queer pressure groups need to back off of the church and not try to force their views on everybody. besides why dose a person's life fiction or not have to orbit around such an obscure fact why do people need to know about their sexual life i don't go blabing about mine.

[RealRepublicanArmy]

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: Melchior wrote: Oh god.

First of all, I still don't believe that .1% figure, it's bulls**t.

Secondly, are you seriously complaining about the fact that homosexual characters are allowed on TV and in the Movies? That sounds incredibly prejudice, and ignorant to assume they there is a central agenda behind all of it.

Homosexuality is becoming a more relaxed, and more of a popular interest in both debate, acceptance, and fiction. What's difficult to grasp? go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer. why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce. all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back. besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric. if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.

I'm not prejudice, I just call them queers. Your prejudice for calling me out. Isn't that basically what your saying?

Hey, all I have to say is, Hollywood and television are capitalism at its best. You don't like the show? Don't watch it. If enough people don't watch it, it goes away, just like we learn in basic economics. Obviously they are making money off of these "queer shows" so the audience must be quite sizely. It is business, there is no damn agenda. They market and they sell, and guess what, they are making a **** of money as a **** of people are watching. My advice is as I said before, you don't like the show, change the channel. Better yet, read a book, whichever one you want.

[Melchior]

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer.

Census forms are meant to burn.

I have been around, homosexuals are everywhere. Walk into any bar/club/restaurant in any city, you'll meet a few.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce.

Whoa, ever heard of these?: ,

I said your post was prejudice, because you are basically telling me homosexual characters shouldn't be allowed on TV and in Cinema.

That's what I got from your post, correct me if that's wrong.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back.

There is no "queer agenda"

Stop saying that, all homosexuals want is to attain equality under that law, in society, and to go on with their lives.

Brokeback Mountain is JUST A MOVIE. Maybe it's a good movie, maybe it's a bad movie, but it's a MOVIE nonetheless.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric.

WTF?

Link?

Proof?

I have never heard of the "outright citizens for the end of religious practice" organization. That wouldn't make sense anyway, seeing as how many gays are religious.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.

You just aren't making sense anymore.

[Ewrue The Veracious]

RealRepublicanArmy wrote: Firstly, your a biggot and I hope this thread gets locked and you get banned. Secondly, call them gays or homosexuals. Thirdly, your a biggot. firstly your a biggot to for calling me a biggot
and secondly gay means happy not queer, homosexuality is the act of a queer homosexual simply means same sexuality how dare you call your self a realrepubican. queer means strange and if your numbers are below 2% then you are strange.

what makes me a biggot the fact that i disagree with you that is a liberal debate tactic when their argument can offer nothing of value to the point.

[Ewrue The Veracious]

Melchior wrote: Ewrue The Veracious wrote: go find a cenuse report and get the real numbers if you feel so inclined i was just guessing but i doubt it is even 1% population that is queer.

Census forms are meant to burn.

I have been around, homosexuals are everywhere. Walk into any bar/club/restaurant in any city, you'll meet a few.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: why do i have to hear about my narrowmindedness frome somebody who is narrowminded i am not predudice you are callin names my friend so you are preduduce.

Whoa, ever heard of these?: ,

I said your post was prejudice, because you are basically telling me homosexual characters shouldn't be allowed on TV and in Cinema.

That's what I got from your post, correct me if that's wrong.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: all i am saying is that the queer agenda is going to doom the queer population when a minority especially one so out of the mainstreem starts pushing the majority around and fanning the flames then they will be pushed back.

There is no "queer agenda"

Stop saying that, all homosexuals want is to attain equality under that law, in society, and to go on with their lives.

Brokeback Mountain is JUST A MOVIE. Maybe it's a good movie, maybe it's a bad movie, but it's a MOVIE nonetheless.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: besides the queer agenda is seeking the demise of the church so they are not even following their own retoric.

WTF?

Link?

Proof?

I have never heard of the "outright citizens for the end of religious practice" organization. That wouldn't make sense anyway, seeing as how many gays are religious.

Ewrue The Veracious wrote: if queers can speak simbly of god cherches can too and if that means telling them that wicked people burn in hell then they have as much right to say that as anyone else and queers should never get an apology from the pope or the cahtolic chuch or any other religion the bible should not be rewritten for them.

You just aren't making sense anymore. gay people are religiouse true happy people are religious

now for some vocabulary

gay 1. happy and carefree: jolly 2. brightly colored or ornamintal 3.jaunty: sporty 4. full of or given to lighthearted plesure 5. raskish; libertine. also see gayness.

Homo: prefix meaning substantualy mixed.

Sexual: 1. of a sexual nature 2. agjictive discribing trait of a person (ie) sexualy mature, sexualy active

learn english it is a great language.