Political Crossfire Forums

thefranzkafkafront · Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:45 am Post subject: Party Subsections.

Prehaps a slighty odd request but would it be possible to have national or ideological subsections to the current party system, for example a british libertarian party. Of course i would still want to converse with other libertarians (allthough this logically stands for all other ideologies) regarless of nationality a british libertarian party would allow for a dicussion of libertarianism with a more british focus (where as the currenlty is highly americo-centric)

Meh!

Korimyr the Rat · Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 983 Location: Wyoming

I think it's a good idea, especially considering how broad some of these "ideologies" can be.

Gus · Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 7609 Location: Tampa, FL

Moved to Q&A.

Ragnar Danneskjold · Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 2628 Location: Mulligan's Valley

i think that anarco capitalist should have a subforum in the LPHQ

anselfir · Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 23046 Location: ZzZzZzZz

meh, these things don't provide much real practical value anyways. It's like them indian drape doors, can't do a thing.

they look like this,

Ragnar Danneskjold · Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 2628 Location: Mulligan's Valley

oneofthem wrote: meh, these things don't provide much real practical value anyways. It's like them indian drape doors, can't do a thing.

they look like this,

WTF

John Galt · Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 21627 Location: Minnesota

So my for my uncle's 100th birthday we went to see him. His son is a biochemist for 3M, and my uncle Ken is very opinionated about everything. Including the idea that there comes a point where bits of matter cannot be split anymore -- it is just destroyed. Don't ask me WHY he started talking about string theory -- he's 100 years old. Anyway, his son Buck started talking about how we can split protons and nuetrons and whatnot quarks and into something (i don't even know -- it ended with -tons) and then my uncle Ken says, "And then what? Allgons?"

anselfir · Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 23046 Location: ZzZzZzZz

Tom Hagen wrote: oneofthem wrote: meh, these things don't provide much real practical value anyways. It's like them indian drape doors, can't do a thing.

they look like this,

WTF it is not practical.

Shady · Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 7413 Location: VA

Tom Hagen wrote: oneofthem wrote: meh, these things don't provide much real practical value anyways. It's like them indian drape doors, can't do a thing.

they look like this,

WTF

I actually thought it was one of oneofthem's more straightforward posts.

*shrugs*

Kumar · Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 16289 Location: Prague

I'm open to the idea, though as Galt pointed out there is a limit to how many subsections you can have.

Stygma · Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1346 Location: Boulder, Colorado

I think we should avoid breaking down into too small of groups. A british libertarian section for example, would be very small and relatively pointless (as there are already both a LPHQ and a forum for british politics), imho.

Kindred · Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:28 am Post subject:

oneofthem wrote: meh, these things don't provide much real practical value anyways. It's like them indian drape doors, can't do a thing.

they look like this,

:lol:

I agree [on all counts]

thefranzkafkafront · Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:07 am Post subject:

Rohit wrote: I'm open to the idea, though as Galt pointed out there is a limit to how many subsections you can have.

There is a quite a clear divisions in the sub schools of libertariansim between classical liberalism and anarcho capatalism.

Kumar · Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 16289 Location: Prague

thefranzkafkafront wrote: Rohit wrote: I'm open to the idea, though as Galt pointed out there is a limit to how many subsections you can have.

There is a quite a clear divisions in the sub schools of libertariansim between classical liberalism and anarcho capatalism.
That's true, a strong case could be made for that subsection.

Protostar · Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:19 am Post subject:

DIVIDED WE FALL!!!!

spearsy23 · Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 5632 Location: Fulton, Ks

What, are you a set of siamese twins who share two legs or somethin?

Æ · Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 5506 Location: Taxatraz

Protostar wrote: DIVIDED WE FALL!!!!
UNITED WE GO NUTS!!!! ;)

Æ · Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 5506 Location: Taxatraz

thefranzkafkafront wrote: Rohit wrote: I'm open to the idea, though as Galt pointed out there is a limit to how many subsections you can have.

There is a quite a clear divisions in the sub schools of libertariansim between classical liberalism and anarcho capatalism.
I was thinking of this myself the other day before you brought it up. Every party has subsections and one subsection is always using the other section(s) as a tool to promote their own 'secularized' ideology. Heck, the mainstream Democratic Party is split into six subsections. No wonder they're so divided!

In all seriousness, and as alienated as LPers are from the rest of the world, we do not need to be alienated from fellow LPers. That said, I support the creation of subsections as a temporary collaborative problem solving escape from the woes of lockstep warfare.

Ragnar Danneskjold · Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 2628 Location: Mulligan's Valley

soldierofchrist wrote: aLienaTeD wrote: Protostar wrote: DIVIDED WE FALL!!!!
UNITED WE GO NUTS!!!! ;)
A house divided against itself cannot stand. Sounds like LHQ civil war to me, I say it's a great idea! :lol:

thats LPHQ.

anselfir · Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 23046 Location: ZzZzZzZz

no it's not, I love you.

btw creative rendition of the word n0ob there.