| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Canadian_Patriot
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Do you think he would be able to keep it steady for the first shot?"
Yes he would have if he was infact a trained Assassin which he was not.
"Jack Ruby didn't kill himself, he died of cancer I believe."
They say he died of an pulmonary embolism actually this happened when he was awaiting his trial suffering pneumonia at Parkland hospital in Dallas in 67. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dr. Righteous
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 796
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Canadian_Patriot wrote: "Do you think he would be able to keep it steady for the first shot?"
Yes he would have if he was infact a trained Assassin which he was not.
He wasn't a trained assassin. He was an expert marksman. There is a HUGE difference there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Canadian_Patriot
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No expert would need to take more then one shot. there is no excuse for taking 2 shots with the training people alleged he had. Considering his military record said he was a crap shot and thats why he was moved to a base in Japan and trained to man radar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
XiangYu
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3956
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya it was the Magic bullet that killed Kennedy... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Bobicito
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 274
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dr. Righteous
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 796
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Canadian_Patriot wrote: No expert would need to take more then one shot. there is no excuse for taking 2 shots with the training people alleged he had. Considering his military record said he was a crap shot and thats why he was moved to a base in Japan and trained to man radar.
Papers showing his shooting skill showed he hit his target 48 out of 50 times (ABC special on the JFK assassination). He was militarily trained how to shoot. He was an expert marksmen, there is no doubt about that.
The excuse for taking 3 shots (not 2, he took three) were that he was shooting at the PRESIDENT, which definately will have some psychological interferences that would understandably cause him to miss. Also, don't forget that when he was target practicing, his targets weren't moving. This one was.
TwinkieDP wrote: Ya it was the Magic bullet that killed Kennedy...
Actually the 2nd shot or "magic bullet" (not so magic if you actually watch the Zapruder film, showing proof that it was definately possible) penetrated his throat from behind and went into Connally below. The third shot, entering the back of his head and creating an exit wound in the front, is what killed him - proving that no grassy knoll shooter existed.
If there was a grassy knoll shooter, that means he missed all of his shots and Zapruder and his assistant were both deaf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Bobicito
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 274
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That doesn't rule out that a silencer could have been used if there was a miss. A loud day with people cheering, would have been extremly difficult hearing a silencer. So it is a possibility that Oswald could have missed a shot or two. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dr. Righteous
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 796
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bobicito wrote: That doesn't rule out that a silencer could have been used if there was a miss. A loud day with people cheering, would have been extremly difficult hearing a silencer. So it is a possibility that Oswald could have missed a shot or two.
So if there was a grassy knoll shooter, then why didn't the Book Depository shooter use a silencer too? Oswald missed his first shot and hit the last two. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Bobicito
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 274
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good question. I can't tell you, in my opinion there is a cover-up by the goverment. But what hasn't been covered up by the Feds?lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dr. Righteous
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 796
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bobicito wrote: Good question. I can't tell you, in my opinion there is a cover-up by the goverment. But what hasn't been covered up by the Feds?lol
That I am not going to argue with. The cover-up, or at least attempted cover-up, was botched by the government. My question is why? Was it simply so we wouldn't look bad to the Soviets? Or did our government have alterior or evil motives for the coverup? What are they hiding? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
