| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Æ
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 5394
Location: Taxatraz
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Keep the food, beverages and pets away when reading steen's posts. :lol: |
|
| Back to top |
|
EugenicHegemony
Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 4658
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:54 pm Post subject: Re: Why can homosexuals procreate? |
|
|
Rozzlapeed wrote: EugenicHegemony wrote: If it's true that you're (man/woman) who's (born) gay by natural design, then why can you procreate? It would seem to me that if you weren't put on this earth to coitus, then you wouldn't even be capable of procreation. Why aren't all homosexuals sterile?
There is no design, and nature does not have a mind to mean anything.
If a gay person means to reproduce, then they are going to reproduce, whether or not anyone else means for them to do it.
Personally, though, I don't do it for pleasure or for reproduction. I have sex to exert my masculine dominance over women. I use it as a means for control and objectification, as well as a way for me to suppress my own insecurities and massive self-doubt.
So, whatever floats your boat, right? Glad to see you use woman to stroke your fragile self inflated ego. "So, whatever floats your boat, right?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
connermt
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1526
Location: CMH OHIO
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:04 am Post subject: Re: Why can homosexuals procreate? |
|
|
EugenicHegemony wrote: If it's true that you're (man/woman) who's (born) gay by natural design, then why can you procreate? It would seem to me that if you weren't put on this earth to coitus, then you wouldn't even be capable of procreation. Why aren't all homosexuals sterile?
Tell me if I get what you are saying: If nature makes homosexuals, that can't reproduce naturally, then nature should 'known' this & make them sterile?
Not trying to be rude, just trying to understand your underlying reasoning.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
connermt
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1526
Location: CMH OHIO
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Demonic Spoon wrote: BIOLOGICALLY sex is for reproduction. Humans have created other uses for it.
Gay people can still reproduce the 'basic' way, so I don't see your point. Sexual attraction doesn't have anything to do with act of reproduction. :roll: |
|
| Back to top |
|
connermt
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1526
Location: CMH OHIO
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Demonic Spoon wrote: I was referring to the fact that homosexuality is not biologically correct.
What is biologically correct? Mutations in certain species may not seem biologicall correct. Sometimes they aren't 'good' for the animal(s) & the animal(s) die. Sometimes they are good & they help the animal(s) flourish. I would think that anything not for the good of the species (if left to natural selection 100% - NO human interference) would die out.
And since homosexuals have been around since before there was science (& in the animal kingdom), then I don't see how it is biologically incorrect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
|
