Political Crossfire Forums

[SUBURBAN]

.

Michae l H. Hart, the American author of The Hundred: A Ranking of the Most InfluentialPersons in History, called Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) “the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.” To this, one can add a number of his other unique achievements such as the following:

There never was anyone like Muhammad (peace and blessings be on him) whose life has been recorded in such meticulous detail, and there never was anyone in history like Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) whose exemplary deeds are so closely emulated in their daily lives by so many people from so many countries and regions of this world, and to this day.

It was Muhammad alone, among the religious leaders, who could establish a government based on divine guidance for the first time in human history, and that, too, in a land where anarchy had reigned supreme for centuries. He brought law, order, and social justice to a people notorious for endless retaliatory conflicts. If anyone ever became an unchallenged ruler by divine right, it was Muhammad, and Muhammad alone. While he possessed power as absolute as humanly attainable, he remained ever humbler than any of his followers. He said, “I am merely a servant of God and I have been sent only as a teacher.”

It was Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who for the first time taught people to give up alcohol, drugs and all kinds of unclean food. It was none other than Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who for the first time in history established women’s rights by allowing them to own property, inherit, question authorities, reject arranged marriages, and seek divorce when they had reasons for doing so.

There never was such an unlettered man who put the wisdom of the scholars of all the later generations to shame. And there never was a religious leader like him who was so “modern” in his attitudes and policies. He condemned racism and nationalism; he established laws to protect animals, trees, and the environment; he established workers’ rights and banned interest.

In a brief span of 23 years of his prophetic life, Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was able to transform the faith, morality, daily life, and the very mindset of all the varied tribes of Arabia. Within a hundred years his message had changed the hearts and lives of millions in different parts of the world.


The details of the Prophet’s personal life such as how he ate, drank, washed himself, and so on, can be learned from the volumes of Hadith, which form a treasure for such information on his lifestyle. Indeed, it would be impossible to give on this page a detailed account of the varied aspects of the personality of the man Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). Therefore, I would content myself by highlighting here just a few aspects of his personal life.

The Prophet was taller than average, of strong physical build; he was fair of complexion, had a prominent forehead, along with long and thick eyelashes. His face was genial and had a very attractive and pleasant smile.

When he spoke, he spoke to the purpose or else he kept quiet. He was the first to greet a person; and he was not the first to withdraw his hand from a handshake. He never liked people paying him too much respect and prohibited them from standing up when he entered. He visited the poor and the ailing and advised the Muslims to do likewise. He invited the poorest of the poor to partake of his scanty meal.

His wife `A’ishah said, "He always joined in household work and would at times mend his clothes, cobble his shoes, and sweep the floor. He would milk, tether, and feed his animals and do the household shopping" (Al-Bukhari).

The Prophet was of very clean habits and used to brush his teeth five times a day, before each of the daily Prayers. After midnight he used to get up for the Tahajjud Prayers (optional late night Prayer) which he never missed in his life (Al-Bukhari). He was not fastidious about his bed; sometimes he slept on his cot, sometimes on an ordinary mattress, and sometimes on the ground (Zarqani).

He was gentle and kindhearted, always ready to overlook the faults of others. Politeness, generosity, simplicity, and sincerity were the hallmarks of his character.

In dispensing justice, he was firm, but his severity was tempered with compassion. His charming manners won him the affection of his followers. Though he was the Messenger of Allah, and virtually became the ruler of Arabia, he never was proud, and never did he assume any air of superiority. Fear of Allah and humility were deeply ingrained in his heart.

He always received people with courtesy and showed respect to older people. He said, "To honor an old man is to show respect to Allah."

He was very kind to animals. Once during a journey, somebody picked up some bird’s eggs. The bird's painful note and fluttering attracted the attention of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), who asked the man to replace the eggs (Al-Bukhari).

Also as his army marched towards Makkah to conquer it, they passed a female dog with puppies. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) not only gave orders that they should not be disturbed, but posted a man to see that this was done.

The Prophet loved the company of the poor people; and he used to pray, "O Allah, keep me poor in my life and at my death, and raise me at resurrection among those who are poor" (An-Nasa’i).

His house was a hut with walls of unbaked clay and a thatched roof of palm leaves covered by camel skin. He used to sleep on a rough mattress. Once his disciples noticed its imprint on his back. They wished to give him a soft bed, but he declined the offer, saying: "What have I to do with worldly things? My connection with the world is like that of a traveler resting for a while underneath the shade of a tree and then moving on."

He advised the people to live simple lives and himself practiced great austerities. When he died there was nothing in his house except a few seeds of barley left from a mound of the grain (Al-Bukhari).

The Prophet said about himself, "Allah has sent me as messenger so that I may demonstrate perfection of character, refinement of manners, and loftiness of deportment" (Malik).

And when he died, he did not leave a cent, nor any property except his white mule, his weapons, and a piece of land which he had dedicated for the good of the community (Al-Bukhari).

Allah says in the Qur’an what means:

*{You have indeed in the Messenger of God [Muhammad] a beautiful pattern [of conduct] for anyone whose hope is God and the Final Day.}* (Al-Ahzab 33:21)

I hope this is quite informative. May Allah the Merciful make us all worthy of being the sincere followers of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). Thank you and please keep in touch.


Salam.


.

.

[Saracen]

SUBURBAN. Salaam. Another great post. :clap:
But you would want to put it in the Islam forums as well. Thanks for your input. Great post. I hope that many people realize their mistakes into ignorantly accusing Muhammad (PBUH) of evil acts, which he never committed.

[johnz]

This type of thread is common, especially on this website where subjectiveness and opinions account for 99% of all posts.

witwoo

[Saracen]

johnz wrote: This type of thread is common, especially on this website where subjectiveness and opinions account for 99% of all posts.

witwoo

Meaning...?

[johnz]

Moath wrote: johnz wrote: This type of thread is common, especially on this website where subjectiveness and opinions account for 99% of all posts.

witwoo

Meaning...?

That the answer to who is the most influential person in history is a matter of opinion.

[Saracen]

johnz wrote: Moath wrote: johnz wrote: This type of thread is common, especially on this website where subjectiveness and opinions account for 99% of all posts.

witwoo

Meaning...?

That the answer to who is the most influential person in history is a matter of opinion.

True.
P.S. How's ol' Galloway these days? Still causing New Labour trouble? :wink:

[sherborne]

Moath wrote: johnz wrote: Moath wrote: johnz wrote: This type of thread is common, especially on this website where subjectiveness and opinions account for 99% of all posts.

witwoo

Meaning...?

That the answer to who is the most influential person in history is a matter of opinion.

True.
P.S. How's ol' Galloway these days? Still causing New Labour trouble? :wink:

No. I think he is going to get butchered in the commons on Prime ministers question time by Labour MP's. Havig said that, these Scots are made of stern stuff. When he went to America was a good example of that. That senator absaloutley crapped himself. I dont think he was quite used to that kind of treatment.

Heres an interesting point though: Would George Bush ever have got elected if America had Prime Ministers Question time. I would have to give that a resounding no. The man has difficulty with his speeches let alone answering supplementary questions from MP's. I dont think he would survive question time on TV either, especially if he had a presentor of the calibre of Jeremy Paxman. Its all very well having these checks and balances in legal terms. But its all about a bit of debating that sorts the men from the boys. Granted PMQ's wont win you elections, but they can certainly lose you them.

[Buxford]

He seemed to do reasonably well during the debates in 2004, and has been interviewed (and questioned) by several news anchors and hosts. What makes you believe a British questionnaire would be different or more difficult? :roll:

[johnz]

Buxford wrote: He seemed to do reasonably well during the debates in 2004, and has been interviewed (and questioned) by several news anchors and hosts. What makes you believe a British questionaire would be different? :roll:


Mr Bush knew most of the answers to the questions directed his way on the televised debate because of the Iraq war.

Prime ministers question time requires the leader to speak consistently and coherently on a large range of topics with a degree of wit.

[Saracen]

Ok. I think we're straying off in this discussion. Why don't we take it outside to, say, the discussion going about Mr. Galloway in the News and Current Events section?

[sherborne]

Moath wrote: Ok. I think we're straying off in this discussion. Why don't we take it outside to, say, the discussion going about Mr. Galloway in the News and Current Events section?

Ive put a post in european politics if ure interested :-D

[Saracen]

sherborne wrote: Moath wrote: Ok. I think we're straying off in this discussion. Why don't we take it outside to, say, the discussion going about Mr. Galloway in the News and Current Events section?

Ive put a post in european politics if ure interested :-D

I'll see if I can join. :think:

[Buxford]

johnz wrote: Buxford wrote: He seemed to do reasonably well during the debates in 2004, and has been interviewed (and questioned) by several news anchors and hosts. What makes you believe a British questionnaire would be different? :roll:


Mr Bush knew most of the answers to the questions directed his way on the televised debate because of the Iraq war.

Prime ministers question time requires the leader to speak consistently and coherently on a large range of topics with a degree of wit.

How do you know that? Do you have any proof that the candidates are told the questions beforehand, or that the British questionnaires are not pre-answered? Do you honestly believe everything your told on television? Are you somehow implying that British questionnaires are somehow more legitimate or more difficult than American ones? Are you really that gullible? :roll:

[Saracen]

soldierofchrist wrote: You mean not even Jesus was more influential? Jesus started a social, intellectual, moral, and religious revolution that has lasted 2000 years and has 2 billion adherents today. Christianity has shaped the free world. But hey, I'm probaby a little biased. This is all subjective anyway, there is no right or wrong answer, well there may be wrong answers. But there's no definite right one either.

It is subjective, but it's based on the Prophet's (PBH) life story.

[anselfir]

bulls**t. it is the west that rules the world now, so a western figure should be #1.

[Zeeman]

oneofthem wrote: bulls**t. it is the west that rules the world now, so a western figure should be #1.

So who is your candidate ??

If you read the book you will know that it has to be influence during his time and beyond..The writer does a great job explaining his choices.I dont agree with some of the rankings too but it is one interesting read this book.. :-D

[Isaac Brock]

The answer is so, so obvious.... Adam and Eve.

Any arguments?

[Saracen]

Isaac Brock wrote: The answer is so, so obvious.... Adam and Eve.

Any arguments?

Well, they started it all. :wink:

[johnz]

Buxford wrote: johnz wrote: Buxford wrote: He seemed to do reasonably well during the debates in 2004, and has been interviewed (and questioned) by several news anchors and hosts. What makes you believe a British questionnaire would be different? :roll:


Mr Bush knew most of the answers to the questions directed his way on the televised debate because of the Iraq war.

Prime ministers question time requires the leader to speak consistently and coherently on a large range of topics with a degree of wit.

How do you know that? Do you have any proof that the candidates are told the questions beforehand, or that the British questionnaires are not pre-answered? Do you honestly believe everything your told on television? Are you somehow implying that British questionnaires are somehow more legitimate or more difficult than American ones? Are you really that gullible? :roll:

no need to get snappy now pops,

When mr Bush is asked anything by the media it's always 90% to do with the war in Iraq, the very fact that the president only speaks to the people and never with them says alot in my book,

I mean come on, a press conference once in a blue moon is not good enough for the people of America to valuate somebody.

[Deus]

Moath wrote: Isaac Brock wrote: The answer is so, so obvious.... Adam and Eve.

Any arguments?

Well, they started it all. :wink:

Damn 7 Billion inbreds, thats quite an achivement.