mathurin
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 7621
Location: kansas, with every muscle strained to leave
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
plum wrote: mathurin wrote: sure, ill see if my library has it, see if he puts any proof of any kind behind his conjectures
surely you understand that the world of modern academia has a lack of common knowledge, studying something in theory is no substitute for life
surely you know what i mean
Modern academia has a lack of common knowledge? I can't say I understand. Who knows better? Bricklayers?
From what I understand, these theories are the culmination of years and years of archeological, anthropological and historical research, that have been formed through the process of years of observation, experimentation and analysis.
I'm not saying it's gospel, but these theories represent the research of the most educated people in the world on the subject of the origins of societies and civilizations.
But judge it for yourself.
yes, bricklayers know better, about laying bricks!
so when scientific researchers pretend to talk about agriculture i am always skeptical
for example, a person could study every research ever made on sailing, yet be a complete moron compared to a sailor
this study gives the appearance of another attempt by the scientific community to say "we arent great because we are great, it was just an accident, no human decisions have anything to do with it"
and i am skeptical of such conclusions, they reek of political correctness posing as research |
|
