Political Crossfire Forums

[Protostar]

You know, I know this will sound strange coming from someone like me, but I feel homosexuality does have one good benefit for heterosexuals that everyone has been overlooking. The reason: it means more women for straight men. That's right, the more homosexuals there are, the more women for striaght guys, guys like me. I hear there is a big problem in large cities because there is a shortage of single, straight men. I think that's awesome. More women for me. BWAHAHAHAH! What does everyone else think of my awesome new take on homosexuality?

[John Galt]

There are also lesbians champ.

[Protostar]

John Galt wrote: There are also lesbians champ.

Yeah, but I don't think there are nearly as many lesbians as homosexual men.

[Pimpkie_69]

And, even if you can't do it with the lesbians, you can watch them do it with each other. And then there's bisexual girls, the best of all. In the perfect world, all guys other than me would be gay, and all girls would be bisexual. That would kick so much ass.

[Gryff1nd0r]

And less babies too. The world has enough babies.

[Enoch]

Pimpkie_69 wrote: And, even if you can't do it with the lesbians, you can watch them do it with each other.

Yeah, good luck with that. :roll:

[Demonic Spoon]

Quote:
And, even if you can't do it with the lesbians, you can watch them do it with each other.



Yes, I'm sure that would go over well. I'm sure you wouldn't mind a gay guy watching you and girl have sex.

[TheGirlNextDoor]

Demonic Spoon wrote: Quote:
And, even if you can't do it with the lesbians, you can watch them do it with each other.



Yes, I'm sure that would go over well. I'm sure you wouldn't mind a gay guy watching you and girl have sex.

:lol:

[TheGirlNextDoor]

Protostar wrote: You know, I know this will sound strange coming from someone like me, but I feel homosexuality does have one good benefit for heterosexuals that everyone has been overlooking. The reason: it means more women for straight men. That's right, the more homosexuals there are, the more women for striaght guys, guys like me. I hear there is a big problem in large cities because there is a shortage of single, straight men. I think that's awesome. More women for me. BWAHAHAHAH! What does everyone else think of my awesome new take on homosexuality?

You are one very strange individual. Has anyone ever told you that before? :?

What about lesbian women?

[John Galt]

What about reading through a post and seeing everyone's responses, so you don't ask the same thing, again?

Oh I kid.

Kinda.

[Malencontreux]

Glad there are more women for you, just remember to reevaluate yourself every month or so ... because if you're turning 35 and you still ain't got a girl ... then gay men are definately getting more action from women than those men.

Also, the downside for you ... because you're referring to the city, you'll have to contend with the girl you're going after having a best friend like me. Yes, that means you have to pass my test -- haha ... this is turning into a will and grace thing. But you understand.

[Protostar]

thegriffinator13 wrote: And less babies too. The world has enough babies.

Hell yeah. I hate babies.

Pimpkie_69 wrote: And, even if you can't do it with the lesbians, you can watch them do it with each other. And then there's bisexual girls, the best of all. In the perfect world, all guys other than me would be gay, and all girls would be bisexual. That would kick so much ass.

Another hell yeah for this one as well. Alot of girls are teasers though. I hate teaser girls! :evil:

TheGirlNextDoor wrote: You are one very strange individual. Has anyone ever told you that before? Confused

What about lesbian women?

:lol: :lol: :lol: Many times GND, many times. About lesbian women, I wouldn't be to worried about them. Like I said I don't think there are as many lesbian women as there are men. I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.

Malecontreux wrote: Glad there are more women for you, just remember to reevaluate yourself every month or so ... because if you're turning 35 and you still ain't got a girl ... then gay men are definately getting more action from women than those men.

Yeah, that would be kind of sad if gay men were getting more action than straight ones. But I have a long ways to go until I'm 35.

Malecontreux wrote: Also, the downside for you ... because you're referring to the city, you'll have to contend with the girl you're going after having a best friend like me. Yes, that means you have to pass my test -- haha ... this is turning into a will and grace thing. But you understand.

Your test? What test? Nevermind, whatever it is, if I have to pass it to get to some hot girl (see "Most Beautiful women in the world" thread to see what I define as a hot girl), then I will pass your silly test (whatever it may be).

[Gryff1nd0r]

Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

[Protostar]

thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

Not true. I talked to this woman in New York (your typical big city) and she said a lot of women there become lesbians out of the desperation of not being able to find a single, straight man. That made my day.

BTW, I hate babies because all they do is scream, holler, and s**t themselves. There is nothing "cute" about a baby.

[Gryff1nd0r]

Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

Not true. I talked to this woman in New York (your typical big city) and she said a lot of women there become lesbians out of the desperation of not being able to find a single, straight man. That made my day.



Since I'm sure that woman is an authority on why women become lesbians, you must be right.

And that doesn't really explain anything about why so many more men are gay than women. If anything there should be more lesbians, the real lesbians, and the desparation lesbians.

[Protostar]

thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

Not true. I talked to this woman in New York (your typical big city) and she said a lot of women there become lesbians out of the desperation of not being able to find a single, straight man. That made my day.



Since I'm sure that woman is an authority on why women become lesbians, you must be right.

And that doesn't really explain anything about why so many more men are gay than women. If anything there should be more lesbians, the real lesbians, and the desparation lesbians.

Of course I'm right. That woman lives in NY so I'm sure she's a bit more knowledgable about than subject than you, griffinator. Plus I wasn't really trying to explain why there are more gay men than women just stating that there are.

[Gryff1nd0r]

Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

Not true. I talked to this woman in New York (your typical big city) and she said a lot of women there become lesbians out of the desperation of not being able to find a single, straight man. That made my day.



Since I'm sure that woman is an authority on why women become lesbians, you must be right.

And that doesn't really explain anything about why so many more men are gay than women. If anything there should be more lesbians, the real lesbians, and the desparation lesbians.

Of course I'm right. That woman lives in NY so I'm sure she's a bit more knowledgable about than subject than you, griffinator. Plus I wasn't really trying to explain why there are more gay men than women just stating that there are.

I know you weren't trying to explain why there more gay men than lesbians. I just thought it was annoying that you said more women become lesbians out of desparation than the fact that maybe they really are lesbians.

Just because that women lives in NYC does not mean she knows more than I do. She may know a small number of women who fit that criteria, but I'm sure she has not taken a poll of the lesbians in the city who became gay out of desparation.

Would you become gay if you couldn't find a girl? Do you know many guys who would answer "yes" to that question? I think not. Most people would be disgusted to do stuff with the sex they are not naturally attracted to.

[Protostar]

thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: thegriffinator13 wrote: Protostar wrote: I also believe a lot of women because lesbians out of desperation, especially in the big cities.



:roll:

Retard. There are more gay men than lesbians, but it has nothing to do with desparation. It may have to do with genetics, if the "gay genes" are located on the X chromosome, than men would be much more likely to be gay than woman, since men only have one X chromosome.

BTW I don't hate babies, I just think there are enough already.

Not true. I talked to this woman in New York (your typical big city) and she said a lot of women there become lesbians out of the desperation of not being able to find a single, straight man. That made my day.



Since I'm sure that woman is an authority on why women become lesbians, you must be right.

And that doesn't really explain anything about why so many more men are gay than women. If anything there should be more lesbians, the real lesbians, and the desparation lesbians.

Of course I'm right. That woman lives in NY so I'm sure she's a bit more knowledgable about than subject than you, griffinator. Plus I wasn't really trying to explain why there are more gay men than women just stating that there are.

I know you weren't trying to explain why there more gay men than lesbians. I just thought it was annoying that you said more women become lesbians out of desparation than the fact that maybe they really are lesbians.

Just because that women lives in NYC does not mean she knows more than I do. She may know a small number of women who fit that criteria, but I'm sure she has not taken a poll of the lesbians in the city who became gay out of desparation.

Would you become gay if you couldn't find a girl? Do you know many guys who would answer "yes" to that question? I think not. Most people would be disgusted to do stuff with the sex they are not naturally attracted to.

Actually I believe she does. First off the lady was about as old as my mom so she has a bit more experience than you do. Second, does not a sample of lesbians in the city represent a good many lesbians in the city? What she said makes sense. She said these women goes lez, because they are desparate for a relationship and affection and it doesn't matter where they get it from, man or woman.

[Gryff1nd0r]

Being old doesn't matter, I know more than my parents about plenty of things. Adults are capable of being perfect idiots but they come across as knowing more.

A sample of lesbians in the city does not neccessarily represent a good many lesbians in the city.

Unless you are bisexual, it matters to everyone whether you have a sexual relationship with a man or a woman.

[JDnCoke]

Protostar wrote: Yeah, that would be kind of sad if gay men were getting more action than straight ones. But I have a long ways to go until I'm 35.

LOL!

Poor, poor Heteros, just don't know what they're missing. :wink: