| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cap'n queasy
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 34968
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eynon81 wrote: cap'n queasy wrote: Eynon81 wrote: desaview wrote: Eynon81 wrote: desaview wrote: A.D wrote: Pimpkie_69 wrote: Propaganda can make people think crazy things. Chinese people may THINK they want a totalitarian state, but if they read George Orwell's 1984, or just stuck their head out of Mao's ass for a second they would realize how much they are usurping their own freedom.
Very patronizing and naive. The Chinese could just as easily claim that Americans THINK they need limited government, but what they really want is totalitarianism.
ad,
both USA and aussies are nations of immigrants and yet speaks so different. Aussies can speak with enough nuances that it is difficult to be angry with aussies but so easy to be angry with or even send planes to USA . why is that so? is it due to the asian influence of the middle way or is it aussie do not carry the disease of being the world sole super power?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: you never met Goldave...hey where'd he go anyway?
hey desa, what the hell is up with your hatred of Americans anyway? I mean you're the most rabid anti-american Chinese person I've ever met, and I've met a lot of angry taxi-drivers.
have u forgotten I am from a muslim country. every Iraqi killed is a blackmark against America here. many here believe the figure is approaching 300,000 already. :cry:
Oh yeah! it makes sense now......
It does make more sense now.
thing is desa blows of the tens of millions killed my the CCP because he feels it was the only way China could be stabilized. Yet on the other hand he reams us for the deaths we caused in Iraq.....far, far fewer in number and all for the same cause of "stabilization".
I don't buy any of that "stabilization" horse s**t, niether ours in Iraq or the CCP's in China. The slaughter of innocent people has never lead to "stabilization".
But I do find desa's statements interesting.....it's always easy to hate when it conviently fits your world view huh?
s**t I know it's easier for me :wink:
I wonder what the effects of Muslim "stabilization" would be?
And you're right, it's the same thing no matter who is doing it. No moral relativism for me, please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
eynon
Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 19134
Location: Minneapolis......
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cap'n queasy wrote: Eynon81 wrote: cap'n queasy wrote: Eynon81 wrote: desaview wrote: Eynon81 wrote: desaview wrote: A.D wrote: Pimpkie_69 wrote: Propaganda can make people think crazy things. Chinese people may THINK they want a totalitarian state, but if they read George Orwell's 1984, or just stuck their head out of Mao's ass for a second they would realize how much they are usurping their own freedom.
Very patronizing and naive. The Chinese could just as easily claim that Americans THINK they need limited government, but what they really want is totalitarianism.
ad,
both USA and aussies are nations of immigrants and yet speaks so different. Aussies can speak with enough nuances that it is difficult to be angry with aussies but so easy to be angry with or even send planes to USA . why is that so? is it due to the asian influence of the middle way or is it aussie do not carry the disease of being the world sole super power?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: you never met Goldave...hey where'd he go anyway?
hey desa, what the hell is up with your hatred of Americans anyway? I mean you're the most rabid anti-american Chinese person I've ever met, and I've met a lot of angry taxi-drivers.
have u forgotten I am from a muslim country. every Iraqi killed is a blackmark against America here. many here believe the figure is approaching 300,000 already. :cry:
Oh yeah! it makes sense now......
It does make more sense now.
thing is desa blows of the tens of millions killed my the CCP because he feels it was the only way China could be stabilized. Yet on the other hand he reams us for the deaths we caused in Iraq.....far, far fewer in number and all for the same cause of "stabilization".
I don't buy any of that "stabilization" horse s**t, niether ours in Iraq or the CCP's in China. The slaughter of innocent people has never lead to "stabilization".
But I do find desa's statements interesting.....it's always easy to hate when it conviently fits your world view huh?
s**t I know it's easier for me :wink:
I wonder what the effects of Muslim "stabilization" would be?
And you're right, it's the same thing no matter who is doing it. No moral relativism for me, please.
well, there is still a question of scale for me...300,000 dead, that is a tragety. 30 million, that's demonic..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
desaview
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1336
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, there is still a question of scale for me...300,000 dead, that is a tragety. 30 million, that's demonic.....
....................................
eynon ,
USA went to another country to "stabilise" them. The muslim world is divided and weak and cannot revenge the humiliation. But it will not be forgotten.
I have given you explanations for events in China. I thought I can enlighten you but that is not to be. Luckily China is today strong enough and dont have to explain itself. Those who want to find out the truth and alternative views, there are plenty on the internet. President Hu's father was mobbed and killled during the Cultural Revolution. Surely that qualifies as a victim of CCP, right? Yet , Hu is President today.
China is not USSR and Mao is not Stalin. the CCP is correct to still consider Mao a national hero. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |
|
