| Click here to go to the original topic View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
learn to swim
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 13416
Location: The Republic of Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
learn to swim
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 13416
Location: The Republic of Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
POSTED: 10:29 pm EST February 24, 2005
GREEN COVE SPRINGS, Fla. -- After a spirited discussion over a photo of a girl wearing a tuxedo at Thursday's Clay County School Board meeting, the principal's decision to ban the picture from the Fleming Island High School yearbook stands.
Kelli Davis, 18, had her senior class photo taken in a tuxedo top and bow-tie outfit provided for boys rather than the gown-like drape and pearls provided for girls. The school's principal decided it could not appear in the yearbook because she didn't follow the dress code.
Kelli, a straight-A student with no discipline problems, is a self-proclaimed lesbian. She said she was uncomfortable to have her chest exposed in the photo.
"Because that's me, you know. That represents me. The drape does not," Davis said. "They're not accepting me, that's the whole reason we're here."
Davis denies it's about her sexual orientation, just about a student not following the rules.
"There's a dress code to follow -- a dress code expected for senior pictures in the yearbook, and she chose not to follow them. It's just that simple," Clay School Superintendent David Owens said.
More than half of the 24 people who addressed the controversy supported using Davis' picture in the yearbook, some applauding after Cindi Davis, the teen's mother, asked the board "What is so offensive about this tiny picture?"
Cindi Davis asked the school board not only to reverse the principal's decision on the photo, but to apologize for firing the yearbook editor, who voiced her support of publishing the photo.
While the board's ruling will keep the photo from appearing with other senior pictures, it will appear in the yearbook. Kelli's parents bought a two-page ad in the back of the book for $700, which will feature the picture.
Story Link |
|
| Back to top |
|
StrangerWitCandy
Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 5453
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| retards. let her wear a tux if she wants. like she said, perhaps she doesn't want to show off her chest... shouldn't even be an issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
JRM4833
Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 22488
Location: Red Sox Dugout
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I didn't even read the whole article but I can't see why it's an issue. And to not put her picture in the yearbook at all is awful. She's a straight A student and her clothes have nothing to do with her sexuality, which they shouldn't really care about anyways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Azadre
Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wow... talk about making bug deals about nothing... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Praetorian
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 8341
Location: Louisiana
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I totally agree with her.
My senior photo isn't in the yearbook b/c I refused to wear that stupid lace thing. I didn't feel comfortable in front of everyone with it on, so I just left. It wasn't due to my sexuality, but nonetheless, they shouldn't force you to wear something you don't want to wear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
superchick
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 6566
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Co sign, they are retards, get over it. Especially since in my yearbook, although the seniors were dressed up, there were plenty of dorks with Slayer and Motley Crue Tshirts on. Cuh-lassssy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
wackywoolf
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm part of the MALE MOVEMENY PARTY and i think it is a disgrace! Women should now their place in society and respect that!!
Vote MALE MOVEMENT |
|
| Back to top |
|
learn to swim
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 13416
Location: The Republic of Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wackywoolf wrote: I'm part of the MALE MOVEMENY PARTY and i think it is a disgrace! Women should now their place in society and respect that!!
Vote MALE MOVEMENT
Check your PM Inbox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
HazelRah
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 15
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(I'm going to assume that 'ww's response was meant to be sarcastic)
Banning the photo from the yearbook is ludicrous and unfair. |
|
| Back to top |
|
F'losrix
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 7999
Location: Michigan, Washtenaw County
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| All I can say is, expect a whole lot more of this kind of thing to happen. Welcome to the dawn of a new age in America, where hatred and stupidity will eventually reign supreme! :1evil: |
|
| Back to top |
|
learn to swim
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 13416
Location: The Republic of Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skeptical Mystic wrote: All I can say is, expect a whole lot more of this kind of thing to happen. Welcome to the dawn of a new age in America, where hatred and stupidity will eventually reign supreme! :1evil:
I think you are wrong. I think we are on the verge of this crap not being acceptable anymore. It has been happening forever - people are becoming less and less tolorant of intolorance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
F'losrix
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 7999
Location: Michigan, Washtenaw County
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
learn to swim wrote: Skeptical Mystic wrote: All I can say is, expect a whole lot more of this kind of thing to happen. Welcome to the dawn of a new age in America, where hatred and stupidity will eventually reign supreme! :1evil:
I think you are wrong. I think we are on the verge of this crap not being acceptable anymore. It has been happening forever - people are becoming less and less tolorant of intolorance.
I have to respectfully disagree. These types of incidents are definitely on the rise again. People who wouldn't have tried this kind of thing six or seven years ago are definitely feeling emboldened at this juncture in time. If you think this is one is bad, you ain't seen nothin' yet! There's a whole lot more to come.
Only time will tell which of us is right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
David
Joined: 29 Dec 2003
Posts: 12235
Location: Louisiana
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I remember a time when that look was the fashion.It's not necessarily male or female.The school board members are a bunch of idiots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MasterChefD
Joined: 27 Feb 2005
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How lame... |
|
| Back to top |
|
liberal_man
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1889
Location: The Social Republic of San Francisco
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is bulls**t, it's just the school board trying to avoid some crap from activists/churchs and all the like. Freakin dumbasses them execs are. :roll: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Placemat
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 154
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wackywoolf wrote: I'm part of the MALE MOVEMENY PARTY and i think it is a disgrace! Women should now their place in society and respect that!!
Vote MALE MOVEMENT
You got to be kidding me, you guys should be shot |
|
| Back to top |
|
emmorris
Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 1365
Location: The Land of 10,000(s) of Socialists
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| :roll: I know several women who used suits for thier senior pictures, and they looked great. The school board has far too much time on their hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Grengor
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 460
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is just another example of bred-in opinions that are not connected with the thinkers reasoning, it was bred in to be completely true, and is therefore not scrutinized by the rational part of their brain(s). Just by saying that the dress code required women to wear dresses admits to the sexual discrimination in the dress code, that "society" has deemed it unacceptable to wear tuxedos when your a female. The way the principal answerers the objections too points out to my earlier point, he doesn't give it much thought so he could pass it off by "being simple" and go on living forever in "simplicity", i.e. an unwillingness to accept the vastly growing change and evolution of our society. |
|
| Back to top |
|
shi'jal
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Forcing anyone to wear something that they would consider too revealing could definitely be considered sexual harassment. All she would have to do to get her photo in the year book would be to have a visit with the school board and her lawyer explaining that. They would probably put their tails between their legs and give up their degrading actions |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Click here to go to the original topic |